Re: Youtube is faster with HTML 5?

2010-10-18 Thread Mystic Prowler
What happens is that Leopard takes too much time loading the Temperature Sensor in the graphics card. If you remove it, it will reduce the startup time by around 90%, but don't complain if the card overheats! -- You received this message because you are a member of the iMac Group, a group for

Re: Youtube is faster with HTML 5?

2010-10-14 Thread Gerald Uhlan
On 10/13/10 8:28 AM, Tina K. penguir...@gmail.com wrote: Update: Here is the link to sign up for HTML 5: http://www.youtube.com/html5 It has specific browser requirements, and videos that contain ads will still play in Flash. Happy viewing! Tina Thanks Tina! I see a marked

Re: Youtube is faster with HTML 5?

2010-10-14 Thread Midnight rider
Hey Tina, I have Leopard on my sawtooth, and I know If i put a 256MB GeForce 6200 it will add around 5 minutes of startup time. If this is true, where is the system file to remove this time wasting? I am planning on buying myself one of them. -- You received this message because you are a member

Re: Youtube is faster with HTML 5?

2010-10-14 Thread Ashgrove
On Oct 14, 6:20 am, Midnight rider coolmar...@gmail.com wrote: Hey Tina, I have Leopard on my sawtooth, and I know If i put a 256MB GeForce 6200 it will add around 5 minutes of startup time. If this is true, where is the system file to remove this time wasting? I am planning on buying myself

Re: Youtube is faster with HTML 5?

2010-10-14 Thread Wallace Adrian D'Alessio
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Ashgrove salum...@gmail.com wrote: On Oct 14, 6:20 am, Midnight rider coolmar...@gmail.com wrote: Hey Tina, I have Leopard on my sawtooth, and I know If i put a 256MB GeForce 6200 it will add around 5 minutes of startup time. If this is true, where is the

Re: Youtube is faster with HTML 5?

2010-10-14 Thread Ashgrove
On Oct 14, 12:31 pm, Wallace Adrian D'Alessio fluxstrin...@gmail.com wrote: Maybe a lighter weight utility is available ? I don't know of any, but my ignorance is fairly encyclopedic, so there might be a couple lurking around...:-) I never minded the long startups when I had that card, anyway.

Re: Youtube is faster with HTML 5?

2010-10-13 Thread Tina K.
On 2010/10/12 20:08, Midnight rider wrote: I tested HTML 5 on my sawtooth, and it is very smooth. Even though I only have a 400Mhz Processor, the RAM and video card make up for that big gap. Anyone who dares to try youtube with HTML 5 on a lower end G4 is welcome, but on a G3 well... I

Re: Youtube is faster with HTML 5?

2010-10-13 Thread Tina K.
On 2010/10/13 04:17, Gerald Uhlan wrote: How do you get to this HTML 5 version of YouTube? My G4 iMac chokes on many of the videos, unless I change to the 240p version (when available). I don't remember exactly where on YouTube's site the HTML 5 option is but a search will hopefully take you

Re: Youtube is faster with HTML 5?

2010-10-13 Thread Ashgrove
On Oct 12, 10:08 pm, Midnight rider coolmar...@gmail.com wrote: I tested HTML 5 on my sawtooth, and it is very smooth. Even though I only have a 400Mhz Processor, the RAM and video card make up for that big gap. Anyone who dares to try youtube with HTML 5 on a lower end G4 is welcome, but on a

Re: Youtube is faster with HTML 5?

2010-10-13 Thread Midnight rider
Basically I want to make my point here. All of my G4's I tested so far (even my 400Mhz sawtooth) plays youtube HTML 5 better than my G5 iMac plays it on flash. My sawtooth plays it so well with it's specs, I can comfortably watch my 15 funny Apple ads video without it freezing or buffering or even

Youtube is faster with HTML 5?

2010-10-12 Thread Midnight rider
I have a question to many people I have been to youtube's site recently where they had the HTML 5 version of the youtube site which by many cases is lighter, (I mean ALOT lighter) than flash. If everything works out, does this mean I can run Youtube (without lag) on HTML 5 on my G4 sawtooth