We have a server running Imail 8.15 with about 100 domains on shared
IP. The same server has also about 50 domains with unique IP
addresses. The server is also running the latest version of Declude.
After upgrading Imail from 7.15 to 8.15 a strange thing has happened
to one on the domains with a s
Here is the RFC on SMTP TLS:
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc3207.html
-Original message-
From: "Chris Mechsner" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 17:46:54 -0700
To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] SSL Email
> Hello - I'm trying to understand the 'life cycle' for
SMTP or POP3 traffic?
-Original message-
From: "Chris Mechsner" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 17:46:54 -0700
To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] SSL Email
> Hello - I'm trying to understand the 'life cycle' for email sent via a SSL
> connection.
>
> Does
Hello - I'm trying
to understand the 'life cycle' for email sent via a SSL
connection.
Does anyone have
any documentation or done this before? My google searches brought
negligible results back.
Thanks!
Chris Mechsner
technical director, ASCENDIO, LLC
e: [EMAIL PROTE
Sandy,
Thank you for the two links, the truth is that I must have not paid
enough attention to these in the past, probably because the
"ldap" _expression_ in the name, and I didn't feel
like to get into any ldap related "fix", as you can also see it
in my opinion about this subject.
Basically: I
> I am not a programmer nor an analyst, so folks who make living with
> this stuff for sure could figure out what method would take the
> least amount of time (talking about milliseconds), to look up valid
> email addresses from a hard disk each time, or loading up the whole
> text file i
Several times in the past few months we talked about the strong
need for a Valid Email Address recipient - text file, that
could be used to get rid of these attacks by the mail
server/gateway.
Since Imail servers are used not just as primary mail servers but as a
gateway as well, in order to redu
In order to not have to login with full address and just userid you must
connect to the IP the domain is bound to so either of you solutions will
work
Eric S
Original Message -
From: "Dan Horne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 9:18 AM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum]
I noticed that john and tim are both at sales.northsails.com while bill is
just at northsails.com but forwards to his sales.northsails.com - I wonder
if you have some sort of "local users only" rule set up and it isn't
recognizing that sales.northsails and just plain northsails are (perhaps)
alias
That cleared up the apparently invalid continuation lines. The only thing
that looks odd to me is the single quotes inside the double quotes for the
"friendly names" of the addressees. It doesn't seem that they should cause
the symptom you report, but it does look wrong. That's a Client-side issue,
Sounds to me like either a bad BCC: or more likely a broken mail client.
I've heard of null sender, but not null recip.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James Robb
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 9:24 AM
To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Su
Hi
Here is the same message in plain text:
I have a user who lately when sending mail it seems to be creating a blank
address which returns a postmaster error to his machine. The first insert
is the error message returned to the user. You can see that there are only
two recipients in the To: l
I second that emotion.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Hitchcock
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 9:03 AM
To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Stop mailboxes check from spammers
IMGate
http://imgate.meiway.com/
Assume I have 2 IP addresses on my Imail box:
.2, .3
.2 = example1.com
.3 = example2.com
My mail server's name is mail.example1.com.
So when a user at example1.com goes to http://mail.example1.com and logs
in, he will need to use only his username.
A user at example2.com goes to http://mail.exa
IMGate
http://imgate.meiway.com/
I cannot recommend it highly enough.
Jeff Hitchcock - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Xavier
Courjaret
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 8:23 AM
To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject:
You can Peer the IMail Server to the exchange server and split the user base
across the to...No extra address (alias) and one place to manage them. The
trick it to get the exchange server to deliver local student mail to the
IMail box directly. I thin someone here knows how to do the Exchange setup
The only reason they would have to do this is if they are going to the wrong
IP.
Eric S
- Original Message -
From: "dkaleky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 6:29 PM
Subject: [IMail Forum] Virtual hosts ip vs no ip
> According to the manual
>
> http://ipswitch.com/
Can you provide the headers in plain text? They are invalid as presented but
most likely that's due to you posting html.
Dan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of James Robb
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 8:31 AM
To: Ipswtich
Subject: [IMail Foru
Hi
I have
a user who lately when sending mail it seems to be creating a blank address
which returns a postmaster error to his machine. The first insert is the
error message returned to the user. You can see that there are only two
recipients in the To: line. In the log transaction you
the next version is supposed to stop this.
Xavier Courjaret wrote:
Hello
How to stop theses spammers to check mailboxes ? Heavy log files because
of them
Example :
20050413 01 127.0.0.1 SMTP (44d3414c014ee4f2) processing
C:\IMail\spool\Q44d3414c014ee4f2.SMD
20050413 01 127.0.0.1
Hello
How to stop theses spammers to check mailboxes ? Heavy log files because
of them
Example :
20050413 01 127.0.0.1 SMTP (44d3414c014ee4f2) processing
C:\IMail\spool\Q44d3414c014ee4f2.SMD
20050413 01 127.0.0.1 SMTP (44d3414c014ee4f2) Trying
armonys.net (0)
20050413
we set ours to "Send to Inbox" because the only sub mailboxes we want
created are by the user themselves. Having it not set to that has the
potential of creating folders without the user even knowing.
Bill
Craig Deal wrote:
Under the General Tab for the Domain, there is an option for Sub-M
Under the General Tab for the Domain, there is an option for Sub-Mailbox
Creation - "Create", "Send to Inbox", or "Bounce". Maybe one of these
options will help?
Craig
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Anders Trolle
> Sent: Wedne
Its a feature - This should help you out.
http://support.ipswitch.com/kb/IM-19990601-DM01.htm
-Kevin
Anders Trolle wrote:
Just a short update:
We discovered this, because mails sent to an address where the part of
the username before the hyphen is a valid username are accepted, even
though the enti
Definately a feature. It's how sub-mailboxes are addressed. I'm not sure how
to avoid this behavior. I have found that [EMAIL PROTECTED] works
(worked? Don't remember when I tried it) but if it's still a valid syntax,
disabling the other version (sub-mailbox on the left of the @) could be
done, but
Just a short update:
We discovered this, because mails sent to an address where the part of
the username before the hyphen is a valid username are accepted, even
though the entire mailaddress does not exist, and so does not return a
NDR. (ie. If the account [EMAIL PROTECTED] exists, mails sent to
Title: Max message size / Max mailbox size
40Mb
0 inbound; 10Mboutbound
80%
Sincerely,Randy ArmbrechtGlobal Web Solutions®,
Inc.804-346-5300 x112877-800-GLOBAL (4562) x112http://globalweb.netRichmond's Internet
Source since 1996!WEB HOSTING including EMAIL beginning at $29/month!DSL
Hi all,
We have encountered a weird problem with non-existent e-mail addresses
containing a hyphen. If we receive a mail addressed to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and that mailbox does not exist, the mail will end
up in the mailbox for [EMAIL PROTECTED] (that does exist) in a subfolder
called 'test'. The su
Jay--
Not too long after purchasing the program, DK (v7 I think) inexplicably
scrambled a partition on one of my NT4 Engineering Workstations.
Made absolute complete mincemeat of it, despite
DK happily reporting that the defrag completed successfully.
Haven't used it on a production box since.
29 matches
Mail list logo
