Dears;
I am not sure if this topic has been discussed before, if so
please guide me to it.
I am trying to add a new language (Arabic) that is not built
in with IMail server, and we are using IMail 2006. The problem is that when a
client logs in to the Iclient side, it gives him the
Please make it possible to submit the username and password through a
different front end website so my users don't have to enter their username
and password twice. This was possible in 2006.04 and earlier and isn't
now
in 2006.1.
Refer to the updated Kbase article at
ftp://ftp.ipswitch.com
Dear Ipswitch,
Where is the patch? WHEN is the patch?:
Attachments forwarded from webmail clients show up as .txt attachments that
can't be opened.
Links sent in plain text Emails aren't able to be clicked
The ability to have a signature attached to replies and forwards would be
nice.
Code th
Monday, November 13, 2006, 12:32:21 PM, Chris Moody <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
CM> -Original Message-
[Snip]
CM> Are you absolutely sure there's no prior (could be way earlier) connect
CM> and EHLO for 99c801a81bde?
CM> Positive. That is the first string for 99c801a81bde in the lo
Monday, November 13, 2006, 6:42:38 AM, Chris Moody <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
CM> I had another complaint Friday. User received the same error message,
CM> logs showed something a bit different though.
CM> 20061110 102455 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (99c701a81bdd) [192.168.0.2]
CM> connect 127.0.0.
Thanks Daniel. Unfortunately regcheck doesn't appear to exist for 8.22 so
I'm waiting for Ipswitch to come back to me.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel Donnelly
Sent: 13 November 2006 19:42
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: R
Hmmm... strange. We have virtual domains for
which they are in use and appear to be working perfectly.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Tripp
Allen
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 3:05 PM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Copy of Outgoing Mails
It
Our customers are currently using them with
8.15/8.22. Why was this functionality dropped in 2006?
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Tripp
Allen
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 2:18 PM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Copy of Outgoing Mails
We did
It wasn't dropped; that's the way the queue manager has
always handled outbound rules. A virtual domain will inherit the
outbound rules of an IP domain.
Tripp
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin
CoxSent: Monday, November 13, 2006 2:56 PMTo:
Imail_Foru
David,
Glad to help and ultimately prove the problem was not really the
POP3 service!
Registry 'cross ups' are where reg info is pointing to an
incorrect item. For example, a domain in IMail has 2 registry
hives, one with the IP (or virtual) as the name and another with
the OHN as the name. Withi
We did remove the outbound rules for virtual domain
settings, but this was removed because outbound rules don't work for
virtual domains. The outbound rules used when a message is sent
are the rules belonging to host that is assigned to the IP address where
the message arrived.
Tripp
Fr
Kevin,
Is this on the list to be added back in? We
have a number of customers who use outbound rules, and adding an IP for each of
them is not an option for us.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Matrosity
Hosting
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Monday, November 13,
Positive. That is the first string for 99c801a81bde in the log.
Imail also creates those process ids in order, not randomly.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rod Dorman
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 12:35 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ip
Gotcha. So, up to 8.22 you can do it,
then.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Matrosity
Hosting
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 1:28 PM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Copy of Outgoing Mails
Ipswitch removed outbound rules for virtuals in
2006.
Ipswitch removed outbound rules for virtuals in
2006.
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850.656.2644
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin
CoxSent: Monday, November 13, 2006 1:13 PMTo:
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: Re: [IMail F
Nope. Virtual domains as well.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Matrosity
Hosting
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 12:57 PM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Copy of Outgoing Mails
I believe it has to be an IP'd domain or the
primary.
Bill Foresma
I believe it has to be an IP'd domain or the
primary.
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850.656.2644
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin
CoxSent: Monday, November 13, 2006 12:46 PMTo:
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: Re: [IMail
This has been a long thread so please excuse the update.
I'm still seeing the errors but have made some progress. The users drive
isn't the issue as I moved all user accounts to another drive and the
problem persisted. I managed to get some helpful support from Ipswitch who
said "You have a lot of
Yep. Use an outgoing rule on the
domain.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Dino Zolezzi
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 12:41 PM
Subject: [IMail Forum] Copy of Outgoing Mails
I want to know if there any way to configure Imail
to send a copy
I want to know if there any way to configure Imail
to send a copy of outgoing mail from one account to another mail account.
For example: when [EMAIL PROTECTED] sends a mail
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] the server sends automatically a
copy to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . This can be done at the
server side
On Monday, November 13, 2006, 07:42:38, Chris Moody wrote:
> I had another complaint Friday. User received the same error message,
> logs showed something a bit different though.
> 20061110 102455 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (99c701a81bdd) [192.168.0.2]
> connect 127.0.0.1 port 2881
> 20061110 10
Does anyone use 2006.1 over dialup. I tried and was shocked at how slow it
is. It downloads about 700K of data to get from the login screen to the
initial mail display. In addition, there are many connection errors due to
the slowness of the dialup connection (about 48K, decent for dialup).
the
> >board. Have any of you seen this pattern and if so, can you give me some
> >advice on what it is and the best way to stop it?
> >
> >Here is a log segment...
> >20061113 091747 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (7e8ba54000bea330)
> >[88.154.146.126] EHLO |http://mai
Since everybody seems to use the same title for several threads-
what exactly will ASSP block?
A reply with the link to the FAQ?
Or the badly formed HELO name?
(or both?:-)
The only thing worse than not pruning a reply to a post is to totally take out
all of the context!
(Web Message in IMail
ASSP will block it automatically and add this helo to the
Blacklist
Matti
-
Matti Haack - Hit Haack IT Service Gmbh
Poltlbauer Weg 4, D-94036 Passau
+49 851 50477-22 Fax: +49 851 50477-29
http://www.haack-it.de
Dieses Dokument ist ausschliesslich fuer den Adressaten bestimmt.
Jeg
Having been a person that has asked a FAQ, I think the best response to
anyone asking a FAQ is a link to the archive or KB. It's polite and provides
the answer without explaining everything all over again.
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850.656.2644
-Original Message-
F
>> Do you even have any idea how age-old the "How to export usernames
and passwords" FAQ is?
Do you even know what FAQ stands for? Then why are you so surprised when
the question is actually asked frequently? If anybody's panties are in a
bunch, it's the "how dare this person ask a ques
gment...
20061113 091747 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (7e8ba54000bea330)
[88.154.146.126] EHLO |http://mail.oldartero.com:8889/cgi-bin/put
this oldartero junk is everywhere by 10s of 1000s. Looks like a
bot-meister screwedup his bots and sent URL in the EHLO field with
always-illegal DNS characters.
Hi,
Then how about adding an item to the etiquette list:
- if you feel that someone is not following proper list etiquette, first try
to contact the participants OFF LIST to voice your feelings.
Explanation:
If someone is TRULY motivated by trying to reduce list-bandwidth, then
starting another
any of you seen this pattern and if so, can you give me some
advice on what it is and the best way to stop it?
Here is a log segment...
20061113 091747 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (7e8ba54000bea330)
[88.154.146.126] EHLO |http://mail.oldartero.com:8889/cgi-bin/put
20061113 091752 127.0.0.1 SMT
gment...
20061113 091747 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (7e8ba54000bea330)
[88.154.146.126] EHLO |http://mail.oldartero.com:8889/cgi-bin/put
20061113 091752 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (7e90800a011ea346)
[88.154.193.252] EHLO |http://mail.oldartero.com:/cgi-bin/put
20061113 091800 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (7e98d92c004
I had another complaint Friday. User received the same error message,
logs showed something a bit different though.
20061110 102455 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (99c701a81bdd) [192.168.0.2]
connect 127.0.0.1 port 2881
20061110 102455 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (99c701a81bdd) [127.0.0.1]
EHLO driller
Very constructive answer. If you feel you must reply to a thread in this manner, could you at least make an attempt at being civil? -Original Message-From: "Sanford Whiteman" Sent 11/10/2006 3:53:50 AMTo: "Zul J" Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Export username and password..> Any tools that
Hi all.
I was feeling bat (like Zul) about all messages about "Export username and
password..", but as a new user in this list, i feel bad too about all
"gurus" "may stop at regurgitating the same conclusion over and over".
I was trying to help Zul, and as i can see, i'm "people who *don't know*"
34 matches
Mail list logo
