I am happy to report that I no longer have unexplained daily Imail
crashes, buggy untested "upgrades" to deal with, sudden price tripling,
or paid support that never has a solution.
I migrated my 1600 Imail users to Smartermail on Monday and it all went
perfect. It is extremely easy to use, seems
We're currently using the copy all option for a client but now need to add
another client to this option. Do we just put the other copyall address in
there separated by a comma?
Thanks,
Bill
WAY OT: For the DNS GurusSharyn:
The cheapest and easiest way to go is to get any old PC with, I would say 1 Ghz
or above and 512MB RAM or more and set up your own Web Server, whether it be
Linux/Apache or Windows 2K/IIS.
The latter is easier to set up and manage, the former is much better on
My guess would be that in the case of "emergency" they are looking for
something away from their
office and a DSL line. ;)
Now more to the point, you could pull this trick off using a URL
redirection. Perhaps your registrar offers
something like this. Is was popular a while ago to redirect to
To heck with hosting, get a PC, throw Debian Linux on it, strap it to a DSL
line and make it happen.
Sorry, had to. :-)
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 2:21 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [
WAY OT: For the DNS GurusSorry Darin and everyone else, didn't mean to send the
msg on the list.
-Jon
- Original Message -
From: Darin Cox
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 2:20 PM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] WAY OT: For the DNS Gurus
To avo
WAY OT: For the DNS GurusTo avoid all of the Me-toos from all of us service
providers on the list, perhaps these offers are best taken off-list?
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Jon Weisman
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 2:13 PM
Subject: Re: [IMail
WAY OT: For the DNS GurusSharyn,
We'll match your current hosting plan and provide you with a dedicated IP
Address.
Thanks,
Jon Weisman | Director of Engineering
International Bell Communications
www.ibell.net
www.ibellhost.com
www.aeronhelpdesk.com
646-862-1555
- Original Message -
As a hosting company we provide IP's upon request so you don't actually HAVE
to have one unless you're using an SSL cert. Yeah, simply add an A record
and point it to the shared IP provided.
Regards,
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850-656-2644
From: [EMAIL PROTECTE
Yea, if they can't set you up, then I'd say get a new hosting company, but
most I've dealt with are pretty good when you ask the right question. I
can't imagine any host forcing a business to use those archaic url's they
default to. Chances are your developer is just used to having everything
set
Your DNS idea is fine. You can point your DNS to whatever you like - the
key to having your WWW site show up properly is the Virtual Host setting in
Apache or the Host Header settings in IIS. It's extraordinarily simple to
configure, and is likely something your web host can configure if asked.
T
On Aug 7, 2007, at 9:43 AM, John T ((lists)) wrote:
Find a new hosting company.
Yup, you should not be bound by the developers lack of resources to
provide you your own domains URL.
I'm sure there are lots of other hosting resources you can find and I
even expect that your Developer wo
Um, any other options?
-Original Message-
From: John T (lists) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 12:44 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] WAY OT: For the DNS Gurus
The hosting company is using Host Headers and will direct incoming req
Your DNS idea is fine. You can point your DNS to whatever you like - the
key to having your WWW site show up properly is the Virtual Host setting in
Apache or the Host Header settings in IIS. It's extraordinarily simple to
configure, and is likely something your web host can configure if asked.
T
The hosting company is using Host Headers and will direct incoming requests
to the proper files by host header, not IP address.
Find a new hosting company.
John T
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sharyn Schmidt
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 9:33 AM
To: Ima
Ah, last I heard it was just one of those 'things' with 8.22. Runs fine
otherwise. Have been testing the 2006 series to replace it on a new server,
glad that it's taken a while with all the random problems I see popping up
in each subsequent release.
--SJ
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
We are using a hosting company.
Our developer is putting together a website that will be accessed by
handheld devices.
We wanted to call the website http://emergency.floridadistillers.com to
resolve to 64.79.167.6, which is the address of the box that the webhosting
company gave us.
The hosting
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
We're running 8.22 and no crashes. My first thought would be file corruption
if you've had problems with 8.22.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: SJ.Stanaitis
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 11:15 AM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Imail 2006.21 SMTP crash
Heck, I'm still trying to get the Web Client working right in 2006.21 :-)
As for the SMTP thing, that anything like the SMTP crashes in the 8.x
series? My 8.22 has done that for ages, I just have the O/S set to restart
the service if it takes a dump. Never expected it to actually get fixed.
FYI - Seen this is the RISK consensus.
(4) HIGH: Ipswitch Internet Collaboration Suite Multiple Vulnerabilities
Affected:
Ipswitch Internet Collaboration Suite 2006
Ipswitch IMail Premium 2006.21 and prior
Description: Ipswitch IMail and Ipswitch Internet Collaboration Suite,
a popular ente
Same here. We keep scheduling the upgrade and putting it off when instability
problems are reported. Ipswitch, what's the status of 2006.21? Please let us
know what problems are being reported and when fixes are projected.
Thanks,
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Herron Jim W. (D
We are scheduled to upgrade from 2006.03 to 2006.21 Monday, 20 August,
2007. We had a very sour experience with 2006.2 and also 2006.1 once
downgraded, that we went back to our latest stable version 2006.03. I
saw this post and a few others that does not really have me wanting to
jump right in ther
23 matches
Mail list logo
