RE: [IMail Forum] SMTP Access Control Limit

2004-12-13 Thread L. Bhandari
celeron 766mhz pc with win2k pro). So it probably just all depends on your situation. ~Laura -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Sent: Saturday, December 11, 2004 2:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [IMail Forum] SMTP

RE: [IMail Forum] SMTP Access Control Limit

2004-12-11 Thread Jay Sudowski - Handy Networks, LLC
ehalf Of Matt Sent: Saturday, December 11, 2004 3:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] SMTP Access Control Limit Darrell, No, but there is a practical limit based on performance. Someone around here designed a tool for automating the updating of the Control Access list. Dependi

Re: [IMail Forum] SMTP Access Control Limit

2004-12-11 Thread Matt
Darrell, No, but there is a practical limit based on performance. Someone around here designed a tool for automating the updating of the Control Access list. Depending on your needs, it might be a better idea to design an DNSBL of your own. Matt Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: According t

[IMail Forum] SMTP Access Control Limit

2004-12-11 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
According to the KB's the "Relay Mail For IP Addresses" table is limited to 100 entries. Does the "Control Access" table also have the same limit? Also, is their a specific KB that indicates this since I was unable to hunt it down. Thanks Darrell --- Check