RE: [IMail Forum] V8 Anti spam

2003-11-14 Thread Attila Balogh
-Original Message- From: Tripp Allen To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11/14/2003 8:27 PM Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] V8 Anti spam If abc.com is in the list, antispamseeder will not add anything ending in abc.com to the list. But, if 1.domain.com is in the list then 2.domain.com will be added if it is

Re: [IMail Forum] V8 Anti spam

2003-11-14 Thread Tripp Allen
CTED]> Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 3:10 AM Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] V8 Anti spam > I'm adding entries to the url-domain-bl.txt with the antispamseeder utility, > and also found many duplicates. > Does your reply mean that we're supposed to check this file manually?

Re: [IMail Forum] V8 Anti spam

2003-11-14 Thread Tripp Allen
Duplicates inside the file do not hurt anything; the queue manager will only load one copy of each string. Tripp - Original Message - From: "Attila Balogh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 3:10 AM Subject: RE: [IMail Forum

RE: [IMail Forum] V8 Anti spam

2003-11-14 Thread Attila Balogh
: Tripp Allen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 11:32 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] V8 Anti spam > > > The url-domain-bl files are created using the antispamseeder > utility and then are manually reviewed. In a sorted

Re: [IMail Forum] V8 Anti spam

2003-11-13 Thread Tripp Allen
al Message - From: "Chris Hunt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 10:09 AM Subject: [IMail Forum] V8 Anti spam > In the Ipswitched supplied url-domain-bl.txt I see lines like this. > > 1.ABC123.net > 2.ABC123.net

[IMail Forum] V8 Anti spam

2003-11-13 Thread Chris Hunt
In the Ipswitched supplied url-domain-bl.txt I see lines like this. 1.ABC123.net 2.ABC123.net 3.ABC123.net Why not just ABC123.net ??? Chris --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude/F-Prot AV] To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mai

RE: [IMail Forum] V8 anti-spam

2003-09-25 Thread Karen D. Oland
y, September 25, 2003 3:37 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] V8 anti-spam > > > On Thursday, September 25, 2003, 11:26:49, Karen D. Oland wrote: > > Although in a perfect world, this test would only find > spammers, in the real > > world it catches pr

Re: [IMail Forum] V8 anti-spam

2003-09-25 Thread Rod Dorman
On Thursday, September 25, 2003, 11:26:49, Karen D. Oland wrote: > Although in a perfect world, this test would only find spammers, in the real > world it catches practically all legit mail sent from inside microsoft (non > msn) corporation So what's the downside :-) > (since they seem to have a

RE: [IMail Forum] V8 anti-spam

2003-09-25 Thread Karen D. Oland
Although in a perfect world, this test would only find spammers, in the real world it catches practically all legit mail sent from inside microsoft (non msn) corporation (since they seem to have a mail server running on every tech''s desktop and no one has PTR's or rDNS set up. > -Original Mes

Re: [IMail Forum] V8 anti-spam

2003-09-24 Thread Chris Hunt
I ask because I get a lot of these type headers that are being flagged by the VALFROM. I only have the mailfrom option checked. Chris X-Persona: Received: from broadcast.cybergolf.com [216.162.206.160] by peake.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.03) id A8331A60106; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 13:45:23 -0400 Recei

Re: [IMail Forum] V8 anti-spam

2003-09-24 Thread Len Conrad
One philosophy would consider a mailserver having no reverse DNS entry as not being a legitimate mailserver. This is perfectly justifiable if stop to ask "what legit server can't/won't have PTR, __ANY__ PTR?? Darn, even 100k spammers on subscriber networks have PTRs. With the RBLs being tak

Re: [IMail Forum] V8 anti-spam

2003-09-24 Thread R. Scott Perry
> For a reverse DNS test, we've seen rates ranging from about 10% to 25% of > legitimate mailservers having no reverse DNS entry. One philosophy would consider a mailserver having no reverse DNS entry as not being a legitimate mailserver. Don't get us started. :) Seriously, though, that is an

Re: [IMail Forum] V8 anti-spam

2003-09-24 Thread Rod Dorman
On Wednesday, September 24, 2003, 12:04:11, R. Scott Perry wrote: >>Perform DNS Lookup for connecting server > For a reverse DNS test, we've seen rates ranging from about 10% to 25% of > legitimate mailservers having no reverse DNS entry. One philosophy would consider a mailserver having no reve

Re: [IMail Forum] V8 anti-spam

2003-09-24 Thread R. Scott Perry
Which of these AS features have the least false positives? Verify Mail From A MAILFROM test will never have false positives, except when a mail client is set up incorrectly (in a way that the sender will never receive bounce messages, and probably never even receive replies). Perform DNS Looku

[IMail Forum] V8 anti-spam

2003-09-24 Thread Chris Hunt
Which of these AS features have the least false positives? Verify Mail From Perform DNS Lookup for connecting server Verify HELO/EHLO Domain Chris --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude/F-Prot AV] To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www

RE: [IMail Forum] V8 Anti spam for virtual domains

2003-08-04 Thread Sean Kenworthy
AMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: [IMail Forum] V8 Anti spam for virtual domains Does anyone know if I have 100 + virtual domains and the only ip domain is the official hostname of the server, will the anti spam features filter down to the rest of the domains from the single ip d

[IMail Forum] V8 Anti spam for virtual domains

2003-08-04 Thread Mark Gordon
Title: Message Does anyone know if I have 100 + virtual domains and the only ip domain is the official hostname of the server, will the anti spam features filter down to the rest of the domains from the single ip domain? The same goes for the content filtering lists and such. Thanks