RE: [IMail Forum] really strange sql occurence

2004-05-06 Thread Larry Craddock
Thanks Pat ... I'll do exactly that. Larry -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pat Hastings Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 3:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] really strange sql occurence To prevent the problem

RE: [IMail Forum] really strange sql occurence

2004-05-06 Thread Pat Hastings
Larry, I have seen this happen before - I suspect that the original table was set up by a user account which is not the account that Imail is currently using to connect to SQL server. EG SA or the dbo account. Then, possibly during a period of high activity on your box or due to a dead lock the Im

Re: [IMail Forum] really strange sql occurence

2004-05-05 Thread Larry Craddock
From: "Sanford Whiteman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Larry Craddock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2004 1:51 PM Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] really strange sql occurence I didn't think it was possible to have multiple tables with the sa

Re: [IMail Forum] really strange sql occurence

2004-05-05 Thread Sanford Whiteman
> I didn't think it was possible to have multiple tables with the same > name in the same db??? Sure, if they have different owners. Usually not recommended for manageability, but possible. > Is it possible the webmail templates are susceptible to a sql > injection and someone was