Ken -
Good catch! I've fixed it. Thanks.
-- Mark --
Mark,
> 91) Change recommendation of optional automatic capabilities in LOGIN
> and AUTHENTICATE to use the CAPABILITY response code in the tagged
> OK. This is more interoperable than an unsolicited untagged
> CAPABILITY response.
Yet, the AUTHENTICATE and LOGIN definitions still list
The last thing I have filed on this is:
Internet Draft: IMAP4 Disconnected Access
Document: internet-drafts/draft-ietf-imap-disc-01.txt
November 1994
> -Original Message-
> From: Alexey Melnikov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 4:13 PM
> To: Mark Crispin
> Cc: IM
On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
> > [IMAP-DISC] Austein, R., "Synchronization Operations for Disconnected
> > IMAP4 Clients", Work in Progress.
> I don't recognize this document. It either became an RFC or expired a long time
> ago.
Yes, it did expire a long time ago. I am hoping
> [IMAP-DISC] Austein, R., "Synchronization Operations for Disconnected
> IMAP4 Clients", Work in Progress.
I don't recognize this document. It either became an RFC or expired a long time
ago.
Regards,
Alexey Melnikov
__
R & D, ACI Worldwide/MessagingD
On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, Sang Park wrote:
> I'm trying to get the listing of sub-folders of a specific folder and am so
> far unable to do this with the LIST command.
Unfortunately, you've run up against a quality-of-implementation issue
with the Netscape 4.15 server. The server apparently ignores th
"Sang Park" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote...
> I'm trying to get the listing of sub-folders of a specific folder and am so
> far unable to do this with the LIST command.
> a0 list "inbox/" *
It looks like the server you're using ignores the reference argument. Is
this a current server, or an old on
On Tue, 4 Jun 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> All I'm saying is that distasteful as it may be to cater to ignorance and
> stupidity, it may make sense to do so on occasion.
I agree completely, and would very gratefully appreciate any assistance
(including but not limited to suggested rewrites) th
Hi all -
I'm trying to get the listing of sub-folders of a specific folder and am so
far unable to do this with the LIST command.
i'm connecting to a netscape 4.15 messaging server and am trying the
following commands:
a0 list "inbox/" *
* LIST (\NoInferiors) "/" INBOX
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) "
> On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
> > While I agree with your thoughts here, the bottom line is that these
> > documents talk about quality-of-implementation issues. You do not
> > *have* to reference them to implement the protocol, therefore they are
> > by definition not normative re
On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
> While I agree with your thoughts here, the bottom line is that these
> documents talk about quality-of-implementation issues. You do not
> *have* to reference them to implement the protocol, therefore they are
> by definition not normative references.
> The information in these two documents is very important to writing an
> interoperable implementation; we've all agreed that the information in
> these documents is important. If they are not in the normative section,
> then they are likely to be unread (and worse, defied).
While I agree with
Mark Crispin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Tue, 4 Jun 2002 10:52:12 +0200, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
> > 2595 looks worse. Making STARTTLS m-t-i means that the IMAP parts of 2595
> > aren't informational any more. Perhaps 2595 needs to be reissued?
>
> I admit that I'm not current on the politics, but f
On Tue, 4 Jun 2002 10:52:12 +0200, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
> 2595 looks worse. Making STARTTLS m-t-i means that the IMAP parts of 2595
> aren't informational any more. Perhaps 2595 needs to be reissued?
I admit that I'm not current on the politics, but from all appearances 2595 is
Standards Track
Draft-17 looks good to me, although I do notice one rather strange
reference:
[CHARSET] Freed, N., and Postel, J. "IANA Character Set Registration
Procedures", Work in Progress.
Ned?
Mark Crispin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Mon, 3 Jun 2002, Lawrence Greenfield wrote:
> > The normative part o
--On Monday, June 03, 2002 19:09:39 -0700 Mark Crispin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Crispin[Page 22]
>
> INTERNET-DRAFT IMAP4rev1 EXPIRES 4 December 2002
>
>
>AUTHENTICATE and LOGIN. In addition, client and serv
16 matches
Mail list logo
