On 4 Dec 2002 at 8:15, Andreas Aardal Hanssen wrote:
If someone does a STATUS on a mailbox that the IMAP server has not seen
before - what is expected output for UIDNEXT and UIDVALIDITY?
I don't understand this question.
Since UIDVALIDITY is an IMAP-feature, and an unseen mailbox, that is
Hello everyone !
To anyone who helped me out with my problem about imap server beeing
very slow for only one user, I found where the problem was:
- this user's home directory is mounted over NFS (nis+autofs+nfs)
- he made a symbolic link /home/user/link pointing to /mnt/export/public
which is a
hi!
i tag a message with a flag eg. test.
after i copy the message the flag is gone.
rfc2060: The COPY command copies the specified message(s) to the end of the specified
destination mailbox. The flags and internal date of the message(s) SHOULD be preserved
in the copy.
imho it was ok in
Andy,
This is an important question. It has led me to realize that the same issue
exists in one edition of my server. I just confirmed this by creating a
new mailbox outside of IMAP and doing a STATUS on it which went as follows:
2 status new (messages uidnext uidvalidity)
* STATUS new
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Pete Maclean wrote:
Andy,
This is an important question. It has led me to realize that the same issue
exists in one edition of my server. I just confirmed this by creating a
new mailbox outside of IMAP and doing a STATUS on it which went as follows:
2 status new (messages
Andreas Aardal Hanssen writes:
So even if it isn't too clear _why_ a client would want to do this,
it's obviously a case that is not handled in the rfc in any way.
Here's a plausible example:
Suppose I've been using elm to read mail and store them in local folders
for the past fifteen years.
Hi all,
I need to connect my Pocket PC to the IMAP server (Microsoft Exchange
Server), do I need to write a seperate socket TCP connection via port 143 to
the IMAP server before I can do the authentication to the server or can I
make use of the IMAP API to do it.
Regards
Tien Soon
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002 17:50:22 +0100 (CET), Andreas Aardal Hanssen wrote:
* STATUS new (messages 3 uidnext 0 uidvalidity 0)
So even if it isn't too clear _why_ a client would want to do this, it's
obviously a case that is not handled in the rfc in any way.
Huh? The RFC is very specific about the
Hi all,
I need to connect my Pocket PC to the IMAP server (Microsoft Exchange
Server), do I need to write a seperate socket TCP connection via port 143 to
the IMAP server before I can do the authentication to the server or can I
make use of the IMAP API to do it.
Regards
Tien Soon
Hi all,
I need to connect my Pocket PC to the IMAP server (Microsoft
Exchange Server), do I need to write a seperate socket TCP
connection via port 143 to the IMAP server before I can do the
authentication to the server or can I make use of the IMAP API to do it?
Regards
Tien Soon
Hi,
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002 20:17:13 +0100 (CET), Andreas Aardal Hanssen wrote...
If someone does a STATUS on a mailbox that the IMAP server has not seen
before - what is expected output for UIDNEXT and UIDVALIDITY? Since the
STATUS command can not change the mailbox in any way - I assume it's not
11 matches
Mail list logo
