Rewriting mail headers

2003-01-09 Thread Padmanaban Kumar
Hi, I would like to know if there is a possibility, if so how, of changing a mail header and rewriting or storing it back at the imap-mailstore, without rewriting the whole mail using the APPEND command. Please respond ASAP, as this is very urgent. Thanks, ~paddu The best reward for a good de

Re: Thread extension weirdness

2003-01-09 Thread Mark Crispin
On Thu, 10 Jan 2003, Timo Sirainen wrote: > Another thing I saw with UW, it > didn't group these messages together: > Subject: =?iso-8859-1?Q?foo?= > Subject: =?iso-8859-1?Q?RE=3A_foo?= Question for the list: should it? It turns out that UW imapd does something different from the base subject ext

Re: Thread extension weirdness

2003-01-09 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 03:26, Mark Crispin wrote: > On Thu, 10 Jan 2003, Timo Sirainen wrote: > > The draft says "If two or more messages have the same Message ID, assign > > a unique Message ID to each of the duplicates". Doesn't that mean that > > those messages should behave exactly as if they di

IMAP toolkit 2002b (imap-2002b) is now available

2003-01-09 Thread Mark Crispin
This note is to announce the availability of the University of Washington IMAP toolkit version 2002b. This release does not introduce major new functionality. Instead, it addresses bugs found in earlier versions. Source code for the latest IMAP toolkit release is available at: ftp://ftp.

Re: Thread extension weirdness

2003-01-09 Thread Mark Crispin
On Thu, 10 Jan 2003, Timo Sirainen wrote: > The draft says "If two or more messages have the same Message ID, assign > a unique Message ID to each of the duplicates". Doesn't that mean that > those messages should behave exactly as if they didn't have Message-ID > header at all? No, although I can

Thread extension weirdness

2003-01-09 Thread Timo Sirainen
The draft says "If two or more messages have the same Message ID, assign a unique Message ID to each of the duplicates". Doesn't that mean that those messages should behave exactly as if they didn't have Message-ID header at all? At least UW and Courier servers don't seem to be doing so. Here's an

CRLF, Maildir etc..

2003-01-09 Thread Andreas Aardal Hanssen
An old issue perhaps? But I couldn't find this in the archives. qmail saves messages using bare LFs. Should an IMAP server convert the mime data to CRLF? Should a client assume CRLF / bare LF mime content when fetching data from the server? Andy -- Andreas Aardal Hanssen -- ---

RE: CRLF, Maildir etc..

2003-01-09 Thread Larry Osterman
I'll also toss out that email messages with bare LF aren't mime content either. RFC822 requires that email messages be CRLF limited, cf Section 2.3 Body: The body of a message is simply lines of US-ASCII characters. The only two limitations on the body are as follows: - CR and LF MUST

re: CRLF, Maildir etc..

2003-01-09 Thread Mark Crispin
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003 23:12:18 +0100 (CET), Andreas Aardal Hanssen wrote: > qmail saves messages using bare LFs. Should an IMAP server convert the > mime data to CRLF? Yes. > Should a client assume CRLF / bare LF mime content when fetching data > from the server? CRLF.