What is wrong with this server?

2004-07-12 Thread Pete Maclean
* OK Merak 7.4.5 IMAP4rev1 Thu, 08 Jul 2004 11:24:27 +0300 a login test1 123456 a OK LOGIN Completed b select inbox * FLAGS (\Seen \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Draft \Recent) * 1 EXISTS * 0 RECENT * OK [UNSEEN 0] * OK [UIDVALIDITY 818058273] UIDs valid * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\Seen \Answered

Re: What is wrong with this server?

2004-07-12 Thread Mark Crispin
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004, Pete Maclean wrote: That, in my view, is not the real problem though. As a server developer myself, I am inclined to be extremely forgiving of server bugs. You shouldn't be. Server bugs are unforgivable. Any forgiveness should be granted to clients. Now, this is not

Re: What is wrong with this server?

2004-07-12 Thread Mark Crispin
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004, Sebastian Hagedorn wrote: Maybe they meant RFC 1730? RFC 1730 didn't have partial syntax; it had a poorly-considered definition of partial fetching which was revoked and replaced in RFC 2060. -- Mark -- http://staff.washington.edu/mrc Science does not emerge from voting,