RE: Regarding IMAP Server

2003-01-19 Thread Mann vas
Hi All, Thanks for all the valuble informations .. Has any one used Java Apache Mail Enterprise Server ( JAMES ) ? Thanks Mann  Catch all the cricket action. Download Yahoo! Score tracker

RE: Regarding IMAP Server

2003-01-15 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Wed, 2003-01-15 at 18:18, Mark Crispin wrote: > On Wed, 15 Jan 2003, Timo Sirainen wrote: > > Well, UW imapd isn't the only one supporting mboxes anymore. I'm writing > > a server that supports multiple mailbox formats, using index files to > > make accessing them quite fast. > > Ah, but do you

RE: Regarding IMAP Server

2003-01-15 Thread Mark Crispin
On Wed, 15 Jan 2003, Timo Sirainen wrote: > Well, UW imapd isn't the only one supporting mboxes anymore. I'm writing > a server that supports multiple mailbox formats, using index files to > make accessing them quite fast. Ah, but do you support mbox format in a *legacy* environment, meaning that

RE: Regarding IMAP Server

2003-01-15 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Wed, 2003-01-15 at 08:12, Mark Crispin wrote: > UW imapd is the reference implementation of IMAP for UNIX systems. Its > default mode is to support the traditional UNIX mailbox format in legacy > timeshared environments, and is the only server that supports such legacy > environments. However,

Re: Regarding IMAP Server

2003-01-14 Thread Alexey Melnikov
IMHO, the best place to look is: http://www.imap.org/products/ Alexey

RE: Regarding IMAP Server

2003-01-14 Thread Mark Crispin
On Wed, 15 Jan 2003 11:40:32 +0530, Padmanaban Kumar wrote: > 2) "outside clients"--What I meant was ,if we have our own smtpd delivering > mail to the mailstore, and our own imap client , written in compliance with > Courier IMAP server, to retrieve the mails,there should'nt be any > issues.Please

RE: Regarding IMAP Server

2003-01-14 Thread Padmanaban Kumar
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 11:20 AM To: Padmanaban Kumar Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Regarding IMAP Server On Wed, 15 Jan 2003 11:07:17 +0530, Padmanaban Kumar wrote: > But I think Courier IMAP is the only open-so

RE: Regarding IMAP Server

2003-01-14 Thread Mark Crispin
On Wed, 15 Jan 2003 11:07:17 +0530, Padmanaban Kumar wrote: > But I think Courier IMAP is the only open-sourced IMAP server available, or > could you suggest a better one ? I guess Cyrus and UW imapd are not > open-sourced . Who told you that Cyrus and UW imapd are not open-source? UW imapd in pa

RE: Regarding IMAP Server

2003-01-14 Thread Padmanaban Kumar
: 'Mann vas'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Regarding IMAP Server On Wed, 15 Jan 2003 10:42:43 +0530, Padmanaban Kumar wrote: > Yes there are a few implementations available for IMAP.You could have a > look at the following URL for one of them. > > http:

RE: Regarding IMAP Server

2003-01-14 Thread Mark Crispin
On Wed, 15 Jan 2003 10:42:43 +0530, Padmanaban Kumar wrote: > Yes there are a few implementations available for IMAP.You could have a > look at the following URL for one of them. > > http://courier.sourceforge.net/ I do *not* recommend that server. It is non-co

RE: Regarding IMAP Server

2003-01-14 Thread Padmanaban Kumar
Hi,   Yes there are a few implementations available for IMAP.You could have a look at the following URL for one of them.   http://courier.sourceforge.net/   Thanks, ~paddu The best reward for a good deed is to have done it -Original Message-From: Mann vas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC