At 07:38 PM 5/27/2004, Mark Crispin wrote:
On Thu, 27 May 2004, Pete Maclean wrote:
One element seems wrong but I am not 100% certain. This server (which I
cannot identify since it has not been identified to me) claims IMAP4Rev1
compliance by virtue of its initial response (* OK IMAP4rev1 Servic
t: RE: UIDVALIDITY response optional?
On Thu, 27 May 2004, Larry Osterman wrote:
> I believe that if you don't return UIDVALIDITY, it means that the
server
> doesn't support persistent UID's. UIDs are still supported, but they
> won't persist from one select to another.
No, UID
On Thu, 27 May 2004, Larry Osterman wrote:
I believe that if you don't return UIDVALIDITY, it means that the server
doesn't support persistent UID's. UIDs are still supported, but they
won't persist from one select to another.
No, UIDVALIDITY is required from an IMAP4 and IMAP4rev1 server.
If UIDs
On Thu, 27 May 2004, Pete Maclean wrote:
One element seems wrong but I am not 100%
certain. This server (which I cannot identify since it has not been
identified to me) claims IMAP4Rev1 compliance by virtue of its initial
response (* OK IMAP4rev1 Service Ready).
IMAP4rev1 compliance is indicate
I believe that if you don't return UIDVALIDITY, it means that the server
doesn't support persistent UID's. UIDs are still supported, but they
won't persist from one select to another.
Larry Osterman
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Pete
