On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Oh, sorry. I just checked that "search to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" didn't match for
> "To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]". It does seem to match for "To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (name)"
> though.
"search to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" would match "To: name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" as we
On Mon, 2003-01-13 at 17:42, Mark Crispin wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > How exactly should SEARCH CC, BCC, FROM and TO match the strings? Spec says
> > "contains the specified string in the envelope structure's CC field", but
> > envelope has it split into multiple fields.
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> How exactly should SEARCH CC, BCC, FROM and TO match the strings? Spec says
> "contains the specified string in the envelope structure's CC field", but
> envelope has it split into multiple fields.
>
> UW IMAP seems to match it directly with the non-parse
How exactly should SEARCH CC, BCC, FROM and TO match the strings? Spec says
"contains the specified string in the envelope structure's CC field", but
envelope has it split into multiple fields.
UW IMAP seems to match it directly with the non-parsed header field. Is that
required, or can other algo
