Re: SMTP -- IMAP information loss

2004-07-20 Thread Gaël Roualland
L Walsh a écrit : Bonjour! Tried that. This is more of a case of purposeful obfuscation on the part of the sender (a spammer) that fakes all the return-path headers/normal from lines but connects, to the MTA with a valid IP/return email IP. What you get in the From line is the

Re: SMTP -- IMAP information loss

2004-07-19 Thread Gaël Roualland
L Walsh a écrit : I have a setup where my ISP recieves my email and stores it in an IMAPs or POP accessible mailbox. I usefetchmail to fetch the email, but everyonce in a while, fetchmail gets denied relay the email through my local sendmail because the sender domain that it reconstructs

Re: SMTP -- IMAP information loss

2004-07-19 Thread L Walsh
Bonjour! Tried that. This is more of a case of purposeful obfuscation on the part of the sender (a spammer) that fakes all the return-path headers/normal from lines but connects, to the MTA with a valid IP/return email IP. If I were able to log onto my ISP's servers, the initial From line in the

Re: SMTP -- IMAP information loss

2004-07-19 Thread Arnt Gulbrandsen
1. The berkeley separator line is just that - a separator line. It's not part of the message, and cannot be, because it's not valid according to either RFC 822 or 2822 syntax. 2. If you'll cast a glance at RFC 2821 page 50, you'll see that when an SMTP server performs so-called final delivery,

Re: SMTP -- IMAP information loss

2004-07-19 Thread Lyndon Nerenberg
--On 2004-7-20 8:09 AM +0530 Arnt Gulbrandsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 3. It does seem rather wrong for you to be inserting mail into SMTP and directing the error messages at someone else. If there is a problem between your fetchmail and the next delivery of the message, where should the error