[Imap-uw] mail_ping issue with Exchange 2007

2008-05-01 Thread Patrick Hamel (path)
Hi, This might be a really specific one; looking for guidelines on doing the right thing with the API c-client offers. Here's the setup: o Server: Exchange 2007, with IMAP ports enabled o Client #1: simplistic client implementation using c-client (I'll give you a better idea in later)

Re: [Imap-uw] mail_ping issue with Exchange 2007

2008-05-01 Thread Mark Crispin
It would probably be more useful if you set OP_DEBUG in your mail_open() calls and collect the mm_dlog() events; this will show a protocol telemetry of what the server is actually doing. With that in mind, I agree that this seems to be bad behavior on the part of the server and your surmises a

Re: [Imap-uw] imapd 2007a and Mac mailer

2008-05-01 Thread Ken Keating
How did you do this? Did you change IMAPSSLPORT in imap4r1.c from 993 to 994 (the most straightforward way)? Or did you use some other means? If so, what? We didn't change IMAPSSLPORT. We're running Solaris 10 and controlling this through inetd: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> svcs -a | grep imap online

Re: [Imap-uw] imapd 2007a and Mac mailer

2008-05-01 Thread Mark Crispin
On Thu, 1 May 2008, Ken Keating wrote: How did you do this? Did you change IMAPSSLPORT in imap4r1.c from 993 to 994 (the most straightforward way)? Or did you use some other means? If so, what? We didn't change IMAPSSLPORT. We're running Solaris 10 and controlling this through inetd: Hmm.

RE: [Imap-uw] mail_ping issue with Exchange 2007

2008-05-01 Thread Patrick Hamel (path)
Here is the slightly compressed log; edited private info out. It's still long though, sorry everyone... mail_open === 2008-05-01 15:41:58,718 Mail - Login - Mailbox/Server[{:993/ssl/novalidate-cert}INBOX], username[path], OpenOptions[1] 2008-05-01 15:41:58,796 Mail - [IMAP]

RE: [Imap-uw] mail_ping issue with Exchange 2007

2008-05-01 Thread Mark Crispin
A couple of notes: There is no reason to believe that a STATUS command in any way reflects what is going on with the selected mailbox stream, even if the mailboxes are the same. So, although interesting, the STATUS results are actually inconclusive. Next: My first hunch looking at the 2nd