[Imap-uw] Mix format? must have? Project direction? [was Re: imap-2007b on SLES10SP1]

2008-06-27 Thread Linda Walsh
Oscar del Rio wrote: Jarmila Holcova wrote: I'm about to move mail server for 15000 users to a new server. The SLES10SP1 distribution contains imap-2004. I would like to use the newest version. The build is ok but I decided to use the rpm from the SLES distribution in the end. What a

Re: [Imap-uw] Mix format? must have? Project direction? [was Re: imap-2007b on SLES10SP1]

2008-06-27 Thread Bob Atkins
Title: Untitled Document I don't see any reason why we all can't move the UW IMAP project over to SourceForge and continue working on it as a true open source development. I am very impressed that Mark dedicated so much of his time to it. Now it is our (collective) turn to start contributing

Re: [Imap-uw] Mix format? must have? Project direction? [was Re: imap-2007b on SLES10SP1]

2008-06-27 Thread Tim Mooney
In regard to: [Imap-uw] Mix format? must have? Project direction? [was Re:...: Mix format? Why is that a must have nowadays? If you're using UW IMAP, mix has some major advantages over both traditional format and mbx. Also, As for 2007'c', where would one obtain sources for it? I take it