[Imap-uw] New messages ignored by imapd?

2007-11-19 Thread Andy Lyttle
I'm using the traditional UNIX mbox format, not maildir or mix. About a month ago, I noticed I had a folder full of spam that appeared to be missing several hundred messages. I played around with it, and concluded something in there was causing imapd to ignore a bunch of messages, even

Re: [Imap-uw] New messages ignored by imapd?

2007-11-19 Thread Andy Lyttle
, Andy Lyttle wrote: I'm using the traditional UNIX mbox format, not maildir or mix. About a month ago, I noticed I had a folder full of spam that appeared to be missing several hundred messages. I played around with it, and concluded something in there was causing imapd to ignore a bunch

Re: [Imap-uw] New messages ignored by imapd?

2007-11-19 Thread Andy Lyttle
I can't imagine why anyone would use a signed value for this. Crazy that all three of these clients have the exact same bug, especially since the correct behavior is defined in the RFC. This is supposed to be fixed in the latest version of Thunderbird (2.0.0.9), and indeed I'm no longer

Re: [OT] Spam filtering (was Re: [Imap-uw] Outlook deadlock)

2007-09-20 Thread Andy Lyttle
I only use sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org and list.dsbl.org. Had to drop the dial-up blacklist due to too many complaints about false positives. Some ISP's seem to use dial-up numbers as fixed IP for business dsl. I use those too. I also catch a small handful with web.dnsbl.sorbs.net, and I block

Re: [Imap-uw] Outlook deadlock

2007-09-18 Thread Andy Lyttle
I doubt very much that the vast majority of users think I want all my email, including all the spam with graphics attachments, downloaded to my hard drive before I even get the chance to look at it. I especially love this when I am paying packet charges, because my high Internet bill

Re: [Imap-uw] Viewing HTML e-mails inline with missing MIME-Version.

2007-07-15 Thread Andy Lyttle
Tan, You may be interested in a piece of software called MIMEDefang (http://www.mimedefang.org/). It basically interfaces with your SMTP server (Sendmail etc.) and automatically fixes broken stuff for you as the messages arrive, so imapd shouldn't ever see messages that don't obey the

[Imap-uw] Re: denying logins

2007-07-10 Thread Andy Lyttle
Andy Lyttle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK, I've got something that seems to work! I've added two lines to the pw_login() function in env_unix.c, so it looks like this: /* make safe copies of user and home */ if (user) user = cpystr (pw-pw_name); home

Re: [Imap-uw] denying logins by GID

2007-06-06 Thread Andy Lyttle
Crispin wrote: On Wed, 6 Jun 2007, Andy Lyttle wrote: What's the best way to configure imapd/ipop3d to deny user logins unless the user is a member of a particular group? The best routine to make such a check is pw_login() in env_unix.c. Note the existing code that checks the list of mail