RE: [Imap-uw] an interesting problem

2007-04-27 Thread Curt LeCaptain
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of David Relson > Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 6:14 PM > To: Mark Crispin > Cc: imap-uw@u.washington.edu > Subject: Re: [Imap-uw] an interesting problem > > On F

Re: [Imap-uw] an interesting problem

2007-04-27 Thread Mark Crispin
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, David Relson wrote: Eh? It sounds like UIDVALIDITY getting set doesn't happen in POP - only in IMAP. I use POP, not IMAP, and see signs of UIDVALIDITY getting set. Can you explain? UIDVALIDITY is set in both IMAP and POP. However, errors are only reported in IMAP. --

Re: [Imap-uw] an interesting problem

2007-04-27 Thread David Relson
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 16:48:59 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time) Mark Crispin wrote: > On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, David Relson wrote: > > Should I rebuild from pristine tarball? That can easily be done. > > Can you point me to the tarball you want me to use? > > Try the imap-2006h development tarball: >

Re: [Imap-uw] an interesting problem

2007-04-27 Thread Mark Crispin
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, David Relson wrote: Should I rebuild from pristine tarball? That can easily be done. Can you point me to the tarball you want me to use? Try the imap-2006h development tarball: ftp://ftp.cac.washington.edu/mail/imap-2006h.DEV.tar.Z Also, are there debug flags/op

Re: [Imap-uw] an interesting problem

2007-04-27 Thread David Relson
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 16:17:14 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time) Mark Crispin wrote: > On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, David Relson wrote: > > Sorry about that. Tis a typo: the range is 859386 to 869199. > > OOcalc tells me that the numbers are in correct sequence. > > Consecutive X-UID: values differ by 1 (neve

Re: [Imap-uw] an interesting problem

2007-04-27 Thread Mark Crispin
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, David Relson wrote: Sorry about that. Tis a typo: the range is 859386 to 869199. OOcalc tells me that the numbers are in correct sequence. Consecutive X-UID: values differ by 1 (never more, never less)... The problem is that you report the UIDVALIDITY getting reset, whic

Re: [Imap-uw] an interesting problem

2007-04-27 Thread David Relson
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 16:07:43 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time) Mark Crispin wrote: > On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, David Relson wrote: > > Since I still have Wednesday's /var/spool/mail file, I can scan it > > for bogus headers. I've taken a look at the X-UID: lines and > > they're properly sequenced (from 85

Re: [Imap-uw] an interesting problem

2007-04-27 Thread Mark Crispin
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, David Relson wrote: Since I still have Wednesday's /var/spool/mail file, I can scan it for bogus headers. I've taken a look at the X-UID: lines and they're properly sequenced (from 859386 to 86199, with increments of 1). One or the other of those values is wrong. UIDs mus

Re: [Imap-uw] an interesting problem

2007-04-27 Thread David Relson
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 15:33:42 -0700 (PDT) Mark Crispin wrote: > On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, David Relson wrote: > > Interesting what you report. Is it your thought that 1 (or several > > bogus headers) would cause uw-imap to download _all_ the messages > > saved on the server? I ask because the behavior

Re: [Imap-uw] an interesting problem

2007-04-27 Thread Mark Crispin
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, David Relson wrote: Interesting what you report. Is it your thought that 1 (or several bogus headers) would cause uw-imap to download _all_ the messages saved on the server? I ask because the behavior I saw last Tuesday was a repeated download of the 8000+ messages in the m

Re: [Imap-uw] an interesting problem

2007-04-27 Thread David Relson
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 09:08:42 -0500 Curt LeCaptain wrote: ...[snip]... > Another solution to this, if you're using an MTA such as Postfix, is > to run header checks and have it strip out the headers that shouldn't > be there, such as the IMAP headers like X-UID. If you're using > postfix, it can

Re: [Imap-uw] an interesting problem

2007-04-27 Thread Mark Crispin
The past few responses have been interesting. It's good news that claws-mail is sending a proper QUIT command. We can therefore dismiss that postulate. As Vyacheslav Frolov notes, there is a newer version of the UW IMAP toolkit. The current release version is imap-2006g: ftp://ftp.

RE: [Imap-uw] an interesting problem

2007-04-27 Thread Curt LeCaptain
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Mark Crispin > Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 11:34 PM > To: David Relson > Cc: imap-uw@u.washington.edu > Subject: Re: [Imap-uw] an interesting problem > > Does

Re: [Imap-uw] an interesting problem

2007-04-27 Thread Vyacheslav Frolov
Hello David, I seen the similar problem some time ago. Used imapd (2004.357) and ipop3d (2006d.96) We updated imapd to 2006d.376 and problem gone. Details: Here are two checks made by "telnet 0 pop3": +OK Mailbox open, 10 messages uidl +OK Unique-ID listing follows 1 4610f0d8005d 2 4610f0d

Re: [Imap-uw] an interesting problem -- attachment

2007-04-27 Thread David Relson
Previous message sent before attaching attachment[05:40:13] POP3< +OK POP3 osagesoftware.com 2004.89mdk server ready [05:40:13] POP3> USER relson [05:40:13] POP3< +OK User name accepted, password please [05:40:13] POP3> PASS [05:40:14] POP3< +OK Mailbox open, 8780 messages [05:40:14] P

Re: [Imap-uw] an interesting problem

2007-04-27 Thread David Relson
Hello Mark, It's good to hear from you! Having been a software developer for several decades, I understand your position -- your program has been running perfectly and the author of another perfect program is saying "you've got a problem". In this conversation, I'm the lucky guy in the middle.

Re: [Imap-uw] an interesting problem

2007-04-26 Thread Mark Crispin
Does the claws-mail program issue a proper QUIT command on the POP3 session to terminate the connection, and wait for the response? If it just drops the TCP connection, then the mailbox is not updated. There is a myth, passed among sorcerer's apprentices who don't read RFCs, that "it is more

[Imap-uw] an interesting problem

2007-04-26 Thread David Relson
Greetings, I've been running uw-imap on my mail server for a number of years. The mailserver is running Mandriva 10.1 with uw-imap installed from imap-2004e-1.1.20060mdk.i586.rpm. My workstation runs Gentoo linux and I'm using claws-mail (with pop3) to retrieve my mail. To allow retrieving mail