Re: [Imap-uw] mbox file size limitations?

2018-07-17 Thread Dan Lukes
On 17.7.2018 22:30, Erik Kangas, Ph.D. wrote: For MIX no broken mailbox repair tool exists Mark has made available mixrbld and mixdfix tools for fixing indexes and message files. Thanks, I has not been aware of it. May be I will try MIX in the future. On 17.7.2018 22:46, Tim Mooney wrote:

Re: [Imap-uw] mbox file size limitations?

2018-07-17 Thread David B Funk
On Tue, 17 Jul 2018, Dan Lukes wrote: On 17.7.2018 20:56, David B Funk wrote: Not to mention, for years Mark Crispin adamantly opposed anything greater than 32 bit code (for portability sake). So there may still be dark corners of the UW/Panda IMAP code that will break on a 64 bit system. Ac

Re: [Imap-uw] mbox file size limitations?

2018-07-17 Thread David Severance
Tim, On 7/17/2018 1:46 PM, Tim Mooney wrote: With an adjusted setting for MIXDATAROLL, it works very well. What value do you find best? thanks, David -- David Severance Enterprise Unix Services Office of Information Technology (949) 824-7552 s...@uci.edu _

Re: [Imap-uw] mbox file size limitations?

2018-07-17 Thread Tim Mooney
In regard to: Re: [Imap-uw] mbox file size limitations?, Dan Lukes said (at...: I can' withstand to answer you using your own footer: Better is not better, 'standard' is better. B{ Classic "UNIX" format used by most of MTA. It's de-facto standard. It's s

Re: [Imap-uw] mbox file size limitations?

2018-07-17 Thread Erik Kangas, Ph.D.
  For MIX no broken mailbox repair tool exists. I consider it unfinished work I'm not ready to finish by self - as a result, I can't use it for production deployment. Mark has made available mixrbld and mixdfix tools for fixing indexes and message files.  These fix 98% of issues.  The remaining

Re: [Imap-uw] mbox file size limitations?

2018-07-17 Thread Dan Lukes
On 17.7.2018 20:56, David B Funk wrote: Not to mention, for years Mark Crispin adamantly opposed anything greater than 32 bit code (for portability sake). So there may still be dark corners of the UW/Panda IMAP code that will break on a 64 bit system. According my experience, it's more stable

Re: [Imap-uw] mbox file size limitations?

2018-07-17 Thread David B Funk
On Tue, 17 Jul 2018, Dan Lukes wrote: GLEN HERRMANNSFELDT wrote on 17. 7. 2018 3:35: Many C implementations using 32 bit int have a 2G file size limit. This happens even if there are no fseek() calls. Moreover, even on those systems having larger int, there's an issue somewhere in the commo

Re: [Imap-uw] mbox file size limitations?

2018-07-17 Thread Dan Lukes
GLEN HERRMANNSFELDT wrote on 17. 7. 2018 3:35: Many C implementations using 32 bit int have a 2G file size limit. This happens even if there are no fseek() calls. Moreover, even on those systems having larger int, there's an issue somewhere in the common part of code. Sometime, about 128 byte

Re: [Imap-uw] mbox file size limitations?

2018-07-16 Thread GLEN HERRMANNSFELDT
Many C implementations using 32 bit int have a 2G file size limit. This happens even if there are no fseek() calls. -- glen > On July 16, 2018 at 6:16 PM Ken Johnson wrote: > > > On a Debian system I support, exim4 delivers mail to /var/mail/ > mbox files. Is there a known limitation to the

[Imap-uw] mbox file size limitations?

2018-07-16 Thread Ken Johnson
On a Debian system I support, exim4 delivers mail to /var/mail/ mbox files. Is there a known limitation to the size of those files that uw-imap imapd and pop3d can support? Thanks, Ken ___ Imap-uw mailing list Imap-uw@u.washington.edu http://mailma