I'm using a very recent version of Horde/IMP, and I'm trying to figure
out if it's possible to do something.
I manage an SMTP server, and I have created a catch-all address for
a certain domain. This address receives all emails directed to
any address at that domain for which a specific mailbox ha
Zitat von Lloyd Zusman :
I'm using a very recent version of Horde/IMP, and I'm trying to figure
out if it's possible to do something.
I manage an SMTP server, and I have created a catch-all address for
a certain domain. This address receives all emails directed to
any address at that domain for
Jan Schneider horde.org> writes:
>
> Zitat von Lloyd Zusman asfast.com>:
>
> > [ ... ]
> >
> > In other words, even though I log in to "catchall mydomain.tld", I
> > want my reply to the mail addressed to random1 mydomain.tld to have
> > random1 mydomain.tld in the "From" line, and likewise
Zitat von Lloyd Zusman :
Jan Schneider horde.org> writes:
Zitat von Lloyd Zusman asfast.com>:
> [ ... ]
>
> In other words, even though I log in to "catchall mydomain.tld", I
> want my reply to the mail addressed to random1 mydomain.tld to have
> random1 mydomain.tld in the "From" line,
Jan Schneider horde.org> writes:
> [ ... ]
>
> Any clean patch that makes some sense is at least considered. There is
> no strict policy, patches are considered based on the code and their
> purpose.
>
> That being said, I could imagine that it makes sense to add this as a
> core functiona
Zitat von Lloyd Zusman :
Jan Schneider horde.org> writes:
[ ... ]
Any clean patch that makes some sense is at least considered. There is
no strict policy, patches are considered based on the code and their
purpose.
That being said, I could imagine that it makes sense to add this as a
core f
Jan Schneider horde.org> writes:
>
> Zitat von Lloyd Zusman asfast.com>:
>
> > [ ... ]
> >
> > Well, I'm just thinking of a generic hook that is run when a reply is
> > requested, but before the text is presented to the user. Let's say
> > this could be called "imp_hook_prereply". Just like fo
Zitat von Lloyd Zusman :
Jan Schneider horde.org> writes:
Zitat von Lloyd Zusman asfast.com>:
> [ ... ]
>
> Well, I'm just thinking of a generic hook that is run when a reply is
> requested, but before the text is presented to the user. Let's say
> this could be called "imp_hook_prereply".
Quoting Lloyd Zusman :
But this proposed "prereply" hook would be equally generic as
"postlogin", "postsent", "signature", and most of the other hooks that
already exist. People can write whatever code they want for these
existing hooks. Why would mine be any different?
I see the argument for
Zitat von Eric Jon Rostetter :
Quoting Lloyd Zusman :
But this proposed "prereply" hook would be equally generic as
"postlogin", "postsent", "signature", and most of the other hooks that
already exist. People can write whatever code they want for these
existing hooks. Why would mine be any dif
Quoting Jan Schneider :
I see the argument for including the code to support the hook, but not
provide his actual hook code... Then people who do want a pre-reply hook
would be able to write one (say, maybe it checks for replies to known
phishing addresses, or something else potentially useful)
Quoting Jan Schneider :
Zitat von Eric Jon Rostetter :
Quoting Lloyd Zusman :
But this proposed "prereply" hook would be equally generic as
"postlogin", "postsent", "signature", and most of the other hooks that
already exist. People can write whatever code they want for these
existing hooks.
Quoting Eric Jon Rostetter :
We always provide examples, for a good reason. If we are going to
add that hook, we should find a useful example. If we don't find
one, then the hook doesn't make sense to me.
Unless I'm misunderstanding, I can think of a couple potential ones...
And how about th
Zitat von Chuck Hagenbuch :
Quoting Eric Jon Rostetter :
We always provide examples, for a good reason. If we are going to
add that hook, we should find a useful example. If we don't find
one, then the hook doesn't make sense to me.
Unless I'm misunderstanding, I can think of a couple potent
Zitat von Eric Jon Rostetter :
Quoting Jan Schneider :
I see the argument for including the code to support the hook, but not
provide his actual hook code... Then people who do want a pre-reply hook
would be able to write one (say, maybe it checks for replies to known
phishing addresses, or s
--- On Wed, 4/1/09, Jan Schneider wrote:
> From: Jan Schneider
> > I don't see a use for the original topic (change
> from based on reply)
> > but I can see where other cases might be useful
> (stop/verify replies to
> > certain addresses, etc).
Weird - i made a topic exactly about that l
16 matches
Mail list logo
