Re: [Imports] [Talk-us] Fresno castradal imports

2012-05-04 Thread Paul Norman
> From: Alan Mintz [mailto:alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net] > Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 3:06 PM > To: talk...@openstreetmap.org; imports@openstreetmap.org > Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Fresno castradal imports > > At 2012-05-04 01:37, Paul Norman wrote: > >See > >http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/

Re: [Imports] [Talk-us] Fresno castradal imports

2012-05-04 Thread Alan Mintz
At 2012-05-04 01:37, Paul Norman wrote: See http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2012-April/008032.html for the full discussion around the removal In summary: - The Fresno import has a number of issues - No one is opposed to removal if there are no easier options for cleaning up the

Re: [Imports] [Talk-us] Fresno castradal imports

2012-05-04 Thread Alan Mintz
At 2012-05-04 11:47, Paul Johnson wrote: On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Paul Norman wrote: >> From: Paul Johnson [mailto:ba...@ursamundi.org] >> Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Fresno castradal imports >> >> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 1:37 AM, Paul Norman wrote: >> More information isn't necessarily bad;

Re: [Imports] [Talk-us] Fresno castradal imports

2012-05-04 Thread Ian Dees
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Paul Johnson wrote: > On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Ian Dees wrote: > > On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Paul Johnson > wrote: > >> > >> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Ian Dees wrote: > >> > On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Paul Norman wrote: > >> > >> > Do

Re: [Imports] [Talk-us] Fresno castradal imports

2012-05-04 Thread Ian Dees
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Paul Johnson wrote: > On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Ian Dees wrote: > > On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Paul Norman wrote: > > > Do those individual polygons have any useful information on them > (addresses, > > for example)? If so, we should generate addr poi

Re: [Imports] [Talk-us] Fresno castradal imports

2012-05-04 Thread Toby Murray
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Ian Dees wrote: > > Do those individual polygons have any useful information on them (addresses, > for example)? If so, we should generate addr points from their centroids. > > Either way, we could save useful OSM information by creating a new polygon > from the out

Re: [Imports] [Talk-us] Fresno castradal imports

2012-05-04 Thread Ian Dees
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Paul Norman wrote: > > From: Paul Johnson [mailto:ba...@ursamundi.org] > > Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Fresno castradal imports > > > > On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 1:37 AM, Paul Norman wrote: > > > See > > > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2012-April/008032

Re: [Imports] [Talk-us] Fresno castradal imports

2012-05-04 Thread Apollinaris Schöll
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Paul Johnson wrote: > > More information isn't necessarily bad; I think it might be better to > try to refine the imported data over time if possible. > > If it hasn't been touched in years than obviously no one is doing it. bottom line it's stale data there is no

Re: [Imports] [Talk-us] Fresno castradal imports

2012-05-04 Thread Paul Norman
> From: Paul Johnson [mailto:ba...@ursamundi.org] > Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Fresno castradal imports > > On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 1:37 AM, Paul Norman wrote: > > See > > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2012-April/008032.htm > > l for the full discussion around the removal > > > > In

Re: [Imports] [Talk-us] Fresno castradal imports

2012-05-04 Thread Paul Norman
See http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2012-April/008032.html for the full discussion around the removal In summary: - The Fresno import has a number of issues - No one is opposed to removal if there are no easier options for cleaning up the data - No one has proposed an easier optio