2014-02-20 3:26 GMT+01:00 Zbigniew Czernik :
> > - 98% of the addresses in this file could have the building=yes tag
> applied.
>
> I don't think so. How I can determine which address should have the
> building tag? Should I compare every address with imagery?
Yes you could do this, but it woul
2014-02-20 2:50 GMT+01:00 Jason Remillard :
> Hi,
>
> - No streets?
> - 98% of the addresses in this file could have the building=yes tag applied.
They could, as well as other tags, and building types could be
specified. But let's solve one issue at a time and do it well?
BTW I haven't read the
W dniu 20.02.2014 09:57, Martin Koppenhoefer pisze:
> Yes you could do this, but it would be better to also do some surveys
> (random samples) to get an idea if the data is accurate.
Are you suggesting that I didn't check? C'mon. I check corectness for
random addresses with imagery and others sour
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 5:24 AM, Zbigniew Czernik wrote:
> W dniu 20.02.2014 09:57, Martin Koppenhoefer pisze:
>
> I sent this data after checking and confirmation by user:ukasiu, who gave
> me a feedback via IRC.
> Should I wait for confirmation from non-polish community for every
> municipalit
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
>> Should I wait for confirmation from non-polish community for every
>> municipality? :P
>
> Yes. That is part of the process, to get the feedback of the overall OSM
> community.
Come on ! Once the process is established and approved and
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 8:52 AM, Pieren wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Serge Wroclawski
> wrote:
>
> >> Should I wait for confirmation from non-polish community for every
> >> municipality? :P
> >
> > Yes. That is part of the process, to get the feedback of the overall OSM
> > communi
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 3:02 PM, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
> Each municipality is a different import. Part of the process needs to be to
> be validation, for example, which has already been brought up and not
> answered.
I wrote "Once the process is established and approved and verified".
If the d
By mistake I sent the replay below to Paul Norman, instead of the list.
Please comment if you think it's enough to consider this CC-BY
copyrighted data ODbL compatible.
El 13/02/14 23:36, Paul Norman escribió:
From: Carlos Dávila [mailto:cdavi...@orangecorreo.es]
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2
Pieren,
Please refrain from posting personal attacks and remain positive and civil
in your discourse.
You've been moderated for 24 hours.
-Your imports@ moderating team
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 7:52 AM, Pieren wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Serge Wroclawski
> wrote:
>
> >> Should
> From: Carlos Dávila [mailto:cdavi...@orangecorreo.es]
> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 8:36 AM
> To: imports@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: [Imports] Fwd: Re: Import proposal: Hydrographic data in South
> East Spain
> >
> > - If the license is CC BY 3.0, we need to verify that they are okay
> >
Hello Everybody,
> Each municipality is a different import. Part of the process needs to be
> to be validation, for example, which has already been brought up and not
> answered.
>
I have been trying to follow this thread, but I think I missed this part.
Could somebody recap this, if this one re
Hi all,
I'm Eduard and I'm planning the OpenStreetMap Hackathon session for the
OpenDataDay in Naples (next saturday). The Public Transportation company
decided to release information (with a Open Data License) on bus stops, so
we can use this information. For this reason I decided to import the d
Hi Eduard,
One of the issues that always seems to cause difficulties on public
transportation imports is the ID/ref. ref= is only used if it is visible on
the stops. If the ID is really an SIRI id or GTFS id, then it should use a
different tag. If the ID, is none of the above, then perhaps it shou
13 matches
Mail list logo
