Hi John,
John Sonnenschein pÃÅ¡e v po 14. 01. 2008 v 23:16 -0800:
> On 14-Jan-08, at 10:41 PM, Moinak Ghosh wrote:
>
> > Anil Gulecha wrote:
> >> On 1/15/08, John Sonnenschein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Question.
> >>>
> >>> I very much am not a fan of the GNUserland & bash, not least
On 14-Jan-08, at 10:45 PM, Josh Lange wrote:
> I've found many of the sun tools to be out of date, and far less
> functional than their gnu counterparts.
>
> I personally want to use Solaris for its stability. I've found the
> linux kernel a little immature, and prone to panics, and deadlocks
On 14-Jan-08, at 10:41 PM, Moinak Ghosh wrote:
> Anil Gulecha wrote:
>> On 1/15/08, John Sonnenschein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Question.
>>>
>>> I very much am not a fan of the GNUserland & bash, not least of
>>> which because they take the concept of standards and toss them
>>> righ
Anil Gulecha wrote:
> On 1/15/08, John Sonnenschein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Question.
>>
>> I very much am not a fan of the GNUserland & bash, not least of which
>> because they take the concept of standards and toss them right out the
>> window.
>>
>> Part of why I came to Solaris in
On Jan 14, 2008 1:29 PM, Matt Ingenthron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Earl,
>
> Earl Cahill wrote:
> > Just wondering if the next release (march?) will have
> >
> >1. full zone support
> >2. kind of coolstack support, meaning easy installs of apache2,
> > mod_perl and mysql
> >
>
I've found many of the sun tools to be out of date, and far less functional
than their gnu counterparts.
I personally want to use Solaris for its stability. I've found the linux
kernel a little immature, and prone to panics, and deadlocks, and random
issues, especially when dealing with network pr
On 1/15/08, John Sonnenschein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Question.
>
> I very much am not a fan of the GNUserland & bash, not least of which because
> they take the concept of standards and toss them right out the window.
>
> Part of why I came to Solaris in the first place when the OpenSol proj
Question.
I very much am not a fan of the GNUserland & bash, not least of which because
they take the concept of standards and toss them right out the window.
Part of why I came to Solaris in the first place when the OpenSol project
launched was precisely because the default userland wasn't fu
We are working on Meta Tracker. Have a look at:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/jds/tasks/MetaTracker/
There is package available there for downloading.
Harry
On Tue, 2008-01-01 at 19:44 +0800, Otan wrote:
> Is there a chance that Google Desktop will run on Indiana (or have it
> installed
Hi Earl,
Earl Cahill wrote:
> Just wondering if the next release (march?) will have
>
>1. full zone support
>2. kind of coolstack support, meaning easy installs of apache2,
> mod_perl and mysql
>
I can't answer the first one, but since over in the OpenSolaris Web
Stack project the
Just wondering if the next release (march?) will have
full zone supportkind of coolstack support, meaning easy installs of apache2,
mod_perl and mysqlThanks,
Earl
Be a better friend, newshound, and
k
Hi guys! I am new man in Solaris, but I want to try it very much. I'm
debian-user now and I have some questions.
1. Can I upgrade ALL Indiana system to current actual state (including kernel,
drivers and etc.) as I can do this in debian by "aptitude dist-upgrade"?
2. Are you provide iso image for
Hi Alex,
* Alex ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi guys! I am new man in Solaris, but I want to try it very much. I'm
> debian-user now and I have some questions. 1. Can I upgrade ALL
> Indiana system to current actual state (including kernel, drivers and
> etc.) as I can do this in debian by "aptit
Is there a chance that Google Desktop will run on Indiana (or have it
installed by default)? Indexing the desktop for fast searching is no longer
optional today. Any serious desktop have this feature. And please don't
insist Beagle because that is so crummy. I know a lot of Ubuntu users not
using B
Dave Miner wrote:
> John Hawk wrote:
>> On the new next release will we see a change in available CD/DVD software?
>> We currently have available cdrw and cdrecord, cdrw being the more stable
>> item.
>> What about a GUI? Or should we start work on python GUI?
>>
>
> I'm unaware of any efforts
John Hawk wrote:
> On the new next release will we see a change in available CD/DVD software?
> We currently have available cdrw and cdrecord, cdrw being the more stable
> item.
> What about a GUI? Or should we start work on python GUI?
>
I'm unaware of any efforts in this area; for what it's wo
On the new next release will we see a change in available CD/DVD software?
We currently have available cdrw and cdrecord, cdrw being the more stable item.
What about a GUI? Or should we start work on python GUI?
jhawk
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
__
17 matches
Mail list logo
