hello all,
(i'm posting to several lists)
As i already said, suspend-resume works well in b100, but since upgraded
to 101a_rc1b, the resume doesn't work, the disk seems to work
permanently and the only choice i have is to poweroff the machine.
i found this bug:
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz
Garrett D'Amore wrote:
> Some people probably feel the same way about zsh. I'm not one of them.
>
> By the way, I'd much rather have /bin/tcsh than /bin/ksh93. Is this a
> case of unfair shell discrimination? :-)
>
> Give me a working /bin/tcsh, and I can work well enough to quickly
> install
Instead of have us finding how create bootable usb key for 2 hours, why no one
write a tool and publish it on OpenSolaris website like other Linux
distributions are doing?
Here is one most Windows users would like to have for OpenSolaris
http://lewk.org/blog/liveusb-creator-2.0.html
I waste way
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 01:02:17PM -0800, Stephen Hahn wrote:
> > about manually creating directories in /var/yp, etc. that NIS experts just
> > rattle off, but that I've never done manually.
>
> ypinit -c will ask you the questions, set the appropriate files,
> create directories, and enabl
Haik:
You can go ahead and file a bug with sysunconfig and lay out your
workaround on what you did in /etc/nwam/llp.
Haik Aftandilian wrote:
> Mary,
>
> mary ding wrote:
>> Dan and other:
>>
>> I filed bug 4645 when I use sys-unconfig.
>>
>> I had to do this to use DNS on my seperate subnet
Shawn Walker wrote:
> Peter Tribble wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 11:51 PM, Garrett D'Amore
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> The last issue on *this* rant, is the lack of tcsh. For well over a
>>> decade tcsh has been available on just about every install of Solaris.
>>> I have it as my d
Mary,
mary ding wrote:
> Dan and other:
>
> I filed bug 4645 when I use sys-unconfig.
>
> I had to do this to use DNS on my seperate subnet and before I run
> sys-unconfig, I had to disable nwam and switch to network physical so
> that sysconfig will work correctly.
>
> # svcadm disable nwam
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 11:08:48PM +0100, Milan Jurik wrote:
> Hi Sebastien,
>
> Sebastien Roy pe v st 12. 11. 2008 v 16:08 -0500:
> > On Wed, 2008-11-12 at 13:02 -0800, Stephen Hahn wrote:
> > > * Dan Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-12 20:46]:
> > > > I have to believe there's more to it th
Peter Tribble wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 11:51 PM, Garrett D'Amore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> The last issue on *this* rant, is the lack of tcsh. For well over a
>> decade tcsh has been available on just about every install of Solaris.
>> I have it as my default shell. If I ever did g
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 11:51 PM, Garrett D'Amore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The last issue on *this* rant, is the lack of tcsh. For well over a
> decade tcsh has been available on just about every install of Solaris.
> I have it as my default shell. If I ever did get NIS working, I still
> wo
> Wayne:
> You are so lucky. On my machine it always takes a
> long time to load the package list, and then more
> time to load the descriptions for each package. And
> during this period, the keyboard input is lost
Funny thing. These were exactly the kind of problems I experienced with
os2008.
Hi Sebastien,
Sebastien Roy pÃÅ¡e v st 12. 11. 2008 v 16:08 -0500:
> On Wed, 2008-11-12 at 13:02 -0800, Stephen Hahn wrote:
> > * Dan Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-12 20:46]:
> > > I have to believe there's more to it than that; surely I have to svcadm
> > > as
> > > Milan notes, and then I
The first time I attempt to boot the live CD on a Sun x4100 there is a long
delay, about 10 minutes, between seeing the message:
Probing for Devices ..
and
Preparing live image for use.
Eventually I see:
WARNING: /[EMAIL PROTECTED],0/pci10022,[EMAIL PROTECTED]/pci1000,[EMAIL
PROTECTED] (mpt0
Dan Mick wrote:
>> ypinit -c will ask you the questions, set the appropriate files,
>> create directories, and enable services. (Turning a NIS client with an
>> explicit list of servers into a broadcast client requires the fiddling
>> you mention.)
>>
>>
>
> Excellent! I was not a
...and we're back to the reason I asked the question...
Hopefully this will be resolved somehow before we release.
mary ding wrote:
> Dan and other:
>
> I filed bug 4645 when I use sys-unconfig.
>
> I had to do this to use DNS on my seperate subnet and before I run
> sys-unconfig, I had to disa
> ypinit -c will ask you the questions, set the appropriate files,
> create directories, and enable services. (Turning a NIS client with an
> explicit list of servers into a broadcast client requires the fiddling
> you mention.)
>
Excellent! I was not aware, and this is the obvious r
Thanks for passing on the message Will.
I don't know about actually technically supporting it, but here is a bit
more info about the card should it be useful.
In linux the ice1712 alsa driver is the one I need to use. That ice1712
driver seems to work reasonably well for me (talking as an end u
Dan and other:
I filed bug 4645 when I use sys-unconfig.
I had to do this to use DNS on my seperate subnet and before I run
sys-unconfig, I had to disable nwam and switch to network physical so
that sysconfig will work correctly.
# svcadm disable nwam
# svcadm enable network/physical:default
> Milan Jurik wrote:
> > Hi Dan,
> >
> > Dan Mick píše v Út 11. 11. 2008 v 20:31 -0800:
> >
> >> Is there a correct way to set up NIS with
> OpenSolaris 2008.11?
> >>
> >
> > what should be different against Solaris?
>
> In Solaris, I select it when I install. I thought
> there might be
On Wed, 2008-11-12 at 13:02 -0800, Stephen Hahn wrote:
> * Dan Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-12 20:46]:
> > I have to believe there's more to it than that; surely I have to svcadm as
> > Milan notes, and then I have to do some
> > selection of domain, and potentially servers, etc. I recall s
* Dan Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-12 20:46]:
> Stephen Hahn wrote:
>> * Milan Jurik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-12 14:30]:
>>
>>> Hi Dan,
>>>
>>> Dan Mick pí?e v Út 11. 11. 2008 v 20:31 -0800:
>>>
Is there a correct way to set up NIS with OpenSolaris 2008.11?
>>> wha
Hi All:
I received a comment from a user on the Orca user's list today (I've
BCC'd him to protect his e-mail address):
"Whilst opensolaris is looking good, and I am considering using it on my
laptop, there is one very big issue stopping me from wanting to use it
on my desktop, it doesn't support
Stephen Hahn wrote:
> * Milan Jurik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-12 14:30]:
>
>> Hi Dan,
>>
>> Dan Mick pí?e v Út 11. 11. 2008 v 20:31 -0800:
>>
>>> Is there a correct way to set up NIS with OpenSolaris 2008.11?
>>>
>> what should be different against Solaris? If you disable nwam and
Harry Fu wrote:
>> Hi Harry,
>>
>> I just IPS-installed OpenSolaris.org 3.0.0 and its
>> associated zh_CN, zh_TW, and ja_JP localization
>> packages into my os200811_RC1 vdi (running in Vista,
>> and the VirtualBox image is stored in a low-speed
>> USB-powered HD). I actually found the response to
Milan Jurik wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> Dan Mick píše v Út 11. 11. 2008 v 20:31 -0800:
>
>> Is there a correct way to set up NIS with OpenSolaris 2008.11?
>>
>
> what should be different against Solaris?
In Solaris, I select it when I install. I thought there might be an
actual convenience fea
Seb,
I managed to boot my MacBook Pro an early 1.83Ghz CoreDuo Model with
the USB stick ok, as I mentioned before using rEFIt as a bootloader to
select the USB stick.
Good luck!
-
James
On 12 Nov 2008, at 09:47, Sébastien Stormacq wrote:
> James,
>
> Nothing is wrong, this is just for the f
Hi guys,
there is a new newsletter for the OpenSolaris distribution that our team
contributes to:
http://www.sun.com/emrkt/opensolaris/ignite
Feel free to subscribe :)
If you have any suggestions for content, please send them to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Regards,
-Roman Strobl
OpenSolaris Evangeli
* Milan Jurik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-12 14:30]:
> Hi Dan,
>
> Dan Mick pí?e v Út 11. 11. 2008 v 20:31 -0800:
> > Is there a correct way to set up NIS with OpenSolaris 2008.11?
>
> what should be different against Solaris? If you disable nwam and enable
> physical, you can use standard yp to
Hi James,
James Gosling wrote:
> Erwann Chenede wrote:
>> Hi James,
>>
>>This is a known problem see 6763600 for details. I'm working on
>> it. I will implement both a background thread
>>and a preferences to disable it.
> Any chance it'll make it into 2008.11? The whole facility is pre
Title: E-mail Signature Sun 2006
About sudo and pfexec ...
Pfexec leverages the role-based access control. Basically, it requests
a specific priviledge and the system checks that you, as the user, has
that priviledge, and then will run the application with the required
priviledge. This allows
George Koutras wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been looking around snv_b101 for save session option but I think
> it has been removed. Is this the case or am I embarrassingly not
> looking at the right place?
Removed, due to upstream rewrite not including the save functionality:
6753114 session handl
Hi,
I have been looking around snv_b101 for save session option but I think
it has been removed. Is this the case or am I embarrassingly not
looking at the right place?
Thnx
___
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss@opensolaris.org
http:/
Erwann Chenede wrote:
> Hi James,
>
>This is a known problem see 6763600 for details. I'm working on
> it. I will implement both a background thread
>and a preferences to disable it.
Any chance it'll make it into 2008.11? The whole facility is pretty
much unusable as it is.
>
> Th
Alfred Peng wrote:
> James Gosling wrote:
>> Nautilus in 101a is totally unusable: when opening any directory, it
>> goes to sleep for *minutes*. I haven't tracked it down completely,
>> but I believe that it has to do with the new "restore" facility
>> scanning the ZFS snapshots on my machine:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 10:25:26AM -0600, Nicolas Williams wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 11:51:39PM -0800, W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
> > http://blogs.sun.com/gerhardhofweber/entry/ntfs_mounting_rw_on_opensolaris
> >
> > I have not tried it yet, but will in the very near future.
>
> I should take a
On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 23:51 -0800, W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
> http://blogs.sun.com/gerhardhofweber/entry/ntfs_mounting_rw_on_opensolaris
>
> I have not tried it yet, but will in the very near future.
>
> The instructions seem to be very thorough. Thanks a whole bunch!
I should warn you that fuse
> I often see this after a "nightly" onnv-gate compilation has finished
> and I "bfu" upgraded the system, and I try to restart into the new kernel
> using a fast reboot (that is, after heavy use of the machine).
>
> The bfu upgrade process does update the boot_archive, three times in a row
> (aft
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 11:51:39PM -0800, W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
> http://blogs.sun.com/gerhardhofweber/entry/ntfs_mounting_rw_on_opensolaris
>
> I have not tried it yet, but will in the very near future.
I should take a look at it sometime. It'd be nice if this could use the
Solaris ID mapping A
Rob-san
I haven't tried to install onto SDHC lately,so will let me try this
weekend.
(I have new A-data 16GB SDHC,I will use for it)
if you got the CR number for it,please let me know.
Thanks a lot,
-masafumi
On 2008/11/12, at 22:19, robs wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I saw the same thing on my 900 whe
> Hi Harry,
>
> I just IPS-installed OpenSolaris.org 3.0.0 and its
> associated zh_CN, zh_TW, and ja_JP localization
> packages into my os200811_RC1 vdi (running in Vista,
> and the VirtualBox image is stored in a low-speed
> USB-powered HD). I actually found the response to be
> quite acceptable
Guido Berhoerster wrote:
> * Jürgen Keil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-11 14:32]:
>> I think the following bug was filed for this issue:
>>
>> CR 6766472
>> *Synopsis*: MSIs do not function on some Nvidia boards
>
> Hm, I only get "this bug is not available". Searching for
> "nvidia" on both bugst
1) see the release notes. for now, the official minimum is 768.
2) i found this bug
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=4762 . you might want
to monitor it.
3) on solaris you have to use pfexec instead of sudo. you can use
sudo, but you'd have to configure it yourself.
regards,
Andr
Hi Dan,
Dan Mick píše v Út 11. 11. 2008 v 20:31 -0800:
> Is there a correct way to set up NIS with OpenSolaris 2008.11?
what should be different against Solaris? If you disable nwam and enable
physical, you can use standard yp tools.
Best regards,
Milan
Hi.
I saw the same thing on my 900 when I tried 101a as well.
I messed around a bit with the Software Install setting in the BIOS, changing
it
from START (which had seemed logical) to FINISHED... and it came up a bit more,
but still has hung a number of times when I've tried to install onto a
Hi all,
I tried out the 101a-rc1b iso standard image (live CD) inside VirtualBox
on Windows Vista (64bit).
I noticed a couple of things:
1) The (VirtualBox) standard of 512 MB RAM for the virtual machine does
not go well together with the live CD image. OpenSolaris boots OK into
the graphical
Sherry Moore wrote:
> This is a known limitation. Currently I keep track of the physical
> pages of the new kernel and boot archive using a contiguous array under
> physical address 1G for simplicity. I did notice that on certain
> systems, after the boot archives are updated, we consistently fa
Masafumi Ohta pisze:
> hi Pawel-san
>
> Eee 1000h and Atom-based notebooks now don't work internal network
> equipments.but you can use external usb-based wifi adapters;
> http://masafumi-ohta.blogspot.com/2008/07/report-opensolaris-installation-on-my.html
> or you should buy Eee 701 or 900 which
* Jürgen Keil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-11 14:32]:
> I think the following bug was filed for this issue:
>
> CR 6766472
> *Synopsis*: MSIs do not function on some Nvidia boards
Hm, I only get "this bug is not available". Searching for
"nvidia" on both bugster and bugzilla doesn't return this
Hi James,
This is a known problem see 6763600 for details. I'm working on it.
I will implement both a background thread
and a preferences to disable it.
Thanks,
Erwann
James Gosling wrote:
> Nautilus in 101a is totally unusable: when opening any directory, it
>
James,
Nothing is wrong, this is just for the fun :-)
Seb
---
Sébastien Stormacq
Senior Software Architect
GSS Software Practice,
Sun Microsystems Luxembourg
On 12 Nov 2008, at 01:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Just out of interest - whats up with booting from the CD/DVD on the
> MacBook Pro
Just out of interest - whats up with booting from the CD/DVD on the MacBook Pro
- I have managed that a couple of times with an original 2008.05 disk. I am
using rEFIt (http://refit.sourceforge.net/) as a bootloader on my Mac - I'll
have a go with my USB stick tonight and see what happens.
-Jam
I tried to install RC1 on my Eee 901,It went almost good,but wifi and
wired haven't worked yet and now have no workaround.(have to use some
usb-based wifi adapters)
Ralink wifi problem on Eee 901 has CR 6732657,I hope it will be solved
soon..
Regards,
-masafumi
__
CC [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 09:03 -0800, Michael Schuster wrote:
> All,
>
> I'm still seeing the problem with this laptop that when I close the lid,
> graphics don't come back properly - rather, I see meaningless blocks of
> colour (a bit like 80x25 graphics "characters").
>
> T
Whilst I appreciate that some people prefer not to have graphical boot please
consider that a user with the unix knowledge to understand text dialogue during
boot up would have the necessary intelligence to locate information on how to
disable "happy face". I agree with your idea of having a "ho
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 14:36:09 +0800
> From: "Qingye Jiang (John)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [indiana-discuss] Installation Failed on EeePC 900 (OS
> 2008.11 RC1 101a)
> To: indiana-discuss@opensolaris.org
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain
Gerard,
do you happen to have gzip compression enabled for you rpool/ROOT/opensolaris-X
?
If yes, disable compression or use lzjb (same as compression=on).
I have documented a procedure which did work for me here (not using milax, but
an opensolaris distro):
http://www.genunix.org/wiki/index.
James Gosling wrote:
> Nautilus in 101a is totally unusable: when opening any directory, it
> goes to sleep for *minutes*. I haven't tracked it down completely, but
> I believe that it has to do with the new "restore" facility scanning the
> ZFS snapshots on my machine: there are currently 607
57 matches
Mail list logo
