On 07/10/09 15:04, Frank Ludolph wrote:
Matt Ingenthron wrote:
Calum Mackay wrote:
out of interest, what exactly is the problem with having more BEs
than you think you need?
ZFS is going to look after the space; I suppose keeping track of
what they all are is the issue?
Shawn's answer cove
Matt Ingenthron wrote:
Calum Mackay wrote:
out of interest, what exactly is the problem with having more BEs
than you think you need?
ZFS is going to look after the space; I suppose keeping track of what
they all are is the issue?
Shawn's answer covers the needed functionality, but the issu
> Subject: Re: [eeepc-discuss] [indiana-discuss] netbook optimized distro
> From: masafumi.o...@gmail.com
> To: k_d...@hotmail.com
> CC: masafumi.o...@ctc-g.co.jp; jimg...@sun.com;
> indiana-discuss@opensolaris.org; ug-t...@opensolaris.org;
> eeepc-disc...@opensolaris.org
> Date: Sun, 8 Feb 20
Matt Ingenthron wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
Shawn's answer covers the needed functionality, but the issue is that
there are some classes of things you don't want to have to go create
a new BE for. For instance? I was working on building some
software, noticed the new SunStudioExpress, wen
Shawn Walker wrote:
Shawn's answer covers the needed functionality, but the issue is that
there are some classes of things you don't want to have to go create
a new BE for. For instance? I was working on building some
software, noticed the new SunStudioExpress, went to install it, and
in
Matt Ingenthron wrote:
Calum Mackay wrote:
out of interest, what exactly is the problem with having more BEs than
you think you need?
ZFS is going to look after the space; I suppose keeping track of what
they all are is the issue?
Shawn's answer covers the needed functionality, but the issu
Calum Mackay wrote:
out of interest, what exactly is the problem with having more BEs than
you think you need?
ZFS is going to look after the space; I suppose keeping track of what
they all are is the issue?
Shawn's answer covers the needed functionality, but the issue is that
there are som
out of interest, what exactly is the problem with having more BEs than
you think you need?
ZFS is going to look after the space; I suppose keeping track of what
they all are is the issue?
cheers,
c.
___
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss@o
dick hoogendijk wrote:
In run OpenSolaris 2009.06 and there are two upgrades in the release
repo. SunStudio and (as I see just now) also one for virtualbox.
I think it is not right to create a NEW BE just for these updates.
That is overkill imho.
Can somebody explain why it's chosen to be handl
On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 04:57:26 PDT
Lurie wrote:
> > I think it is not right to create a NEW BE just for
> > these updates.
> > That is overkill imho.
>
> Just as a hypothetical example, since VirtualBox has kernel drivers,
> imagine that an upgrade panics the kernel, if you don't have an old
> BE
> I think it is not right to create a NEW BE just for
> these updates.
> That is overkill imho.
Just as a hypothetical example, since VirtualBox has kernel drivers, imagine
that an upgrade panics the kernel, if you don't have an old BE that means if
you don't know how to debug the kernel you're
dick hoogendijk wrote:
In run OpenSolaris 2009.06 and there are two upgrades in the release
repo. SunStudio and (as I see just now) also one for virtualbox.
I think it is not right to create a NEW BE just for these updates.
That is overkill imho.
Can somebody explain why it's chosen to be han
In run OpenSolaris 2009.06 and there are two upgrades in the release
repo. SunStudio and (as I see just now) also one for virtualbox.
I think it is not right to create a NEW BE just for these updates.
That is overkill imho.
Can somebody explain why it's chosen to be handled like this?
Mind you:
Calum Mackay wrote:
Calum Mackay wrote:
I'm having some trouble installing 0906 for dual-boot with an already
installed Ubuntu.
So far, trying a few things (e.g. Linux swap), the 0906 installer hangs
at 99% with "complete transfer process", stuck because of bootadm
update-menu hanging.
I'll tr
14 matches
Mail list logo
