On Sat, 2008-06-21 at 23:42 -0700, Juan Miguel Bernal Marcos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I couldn't install IPSgawk from IPS blastwave repository but I could install:
> SUNWgcc, SUNWgmake, SUNWxorg-headers. This is the error message:
>
> $ pfexec pkg install IPSgawk
> pkg: no package matching 'IPSgawk'
On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 18:23 -0700, Praveen Kumar wrote:
> Praveen Kumar wrote:
> > I am running OpenSolaris 2008.05 snv_93 with Sun Studio and most other
> > development tools installed. I have managed to compile GNU Emacs 23
> > successfully.
> >
> > I am trying to compile gst-ffmpeg (0.10.4) a
On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 13:57 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> hello all,
> just installed IPSemacs and i got:
> -bash-3.2$ ls -l /opt/csw/bin/emacs
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 9 juil. 18 13:59 /opt/csw/bin/emacs ->
> /dev/null
>
> but /opt/csw/bin/emacs-athena-22.1 works fine
I ran i
On Thu, 2008-08-14 at 08:32 -0700, Alan Steinberg wrote:
> The OpenSolaris development package repository
>
> http://pkg.opensolaris.org/
>
> has been updated to reflect the changes in snv_95 including major fixes
> to the Caiman "Slim Install" and the Image Packaging System (IPS).
> Users
On Fri, 2008-08-15 at 11:12 +0200, Christian Thalinger wrote:
> Since my first image-update didn't complete---couldn't activate the
> new
> BE because there's not enough disk space---I deleted some stuff and
> tried again, without downloading the packages again.
On Thu, 2008-09-04 at 13:46 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The OpenSolaris development package repository
>
> http://pkg.opensolaris.org/
>
> has been updated to reflect the changes in snv_96 including major fixes
> to the Caiman "Slim Install" and the Image Packaging System (IPS). In
>
On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 02:05 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Can you please provide the output of "pkg version"?
Sure:
$ pkg version
093ca22da67c
- twisti
___
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/ma
On Sat, 2008-11-08 at 07:27 -0600, James Cornell wrote:
> don't let such a thing change purchasing decisions. Webcams don't make
> a difference; don't expect them to work.
It was really cool to see that the iSight of my Apple MacBook Pro worked
out-of-the-box. I was impressed.
- Christian
On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 16:13 +0100, Free wrote:
> hello all,
> after install webstack in os200811, i notice that gd.so needs
> libX11.so.4. But "pkg search -r libX11.so.4" gives me 3 answers:
> SUNWxwrtl
> SUNWxwplt
> FSWxwrtl
FSWxwrtl only exits until 0.5.11-0.79 and SUNWxwrtl simply are links to
Hi!
This gets really annoying. Without any reason the ath0 link goes down
and, obviously, NWAM disconnects:
Feb 5 13:47:35 macbook mac: [ID 486395 kern.info] NOTICE: ath0 link down
Feb 5 13:47:35 macbook mac: [ID 744254 kern.info] NOTICE: ath0 link up
Feb 5 13:47:36 macbook mac: [ID 486395 ke
On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 07:32 -0800, Michael Schuster wrote:
> this seems to be closely related to what I saw recently (see the thread
> "strange behaviour of atheros driver(?)" on network-discuss, but don't go
> there expecting much, all there is is a suggestion of Jim Carlson's which I
> haven't
On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 16:38 +0100, Christian Thalinger wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 07:32 -0800, Michael Schuster wrote:
> > this seems to be closely related to what I saw recently (see the thread
> > "strange behaviour of atheros driver(?)" on network-discuss, but don&
On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 12:15 +, Ghee Teo wrote:
> On 03/05/09 09:32, Aubrey Li wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Sorry if this is a known issue, but does anyone notice the gnome network
> > load
> > indicator seems not work? It shows 0% in use even when I transfer a
> > very big file
> > from one mach
On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 12:50 +, Ghee Teo wrote:
> > Sounds like:
> >
> > http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=4504
> >
> It is not exactly. 4504 is about showing the harddisk activity not network.
Yeah, but in comment #2 I said that in snv_105 even network stopped
working. Mayb
On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 15:00 +0100, Gilles Gravier wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Since recent updates (don't remember during which build it started)
> the system monitor doesn't show disk activity (processor and memory
> meters seem to work OK).
>
> Anybody else see this?
Yes:
http://defect.opensolaris.org/b
On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 10:41 +0100, Gilles Gravier wrote:
> Hi gang!
>
> Can somebody explain what status "1-Dispatched" means for this bug :
> http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6668816 ?
>
> Do we have a target date for fixing?
Looking up the bug in Bugster says it's Accepted by Chr
On Thu, 2009-03-12 at 16:52 +0100, Gilles Gravier wrote:
> Hi!
>
> So... how do I get COMPIZ back on B109? Appearance->Visual Effects
> doesn't let me enable it anymore.
>
> I'm on a Toshiba Tecra M2, with NVIDIA drivers
> 173.14.16... /usr/X11/demo/glxgears works at 2200 FPS, so I have
> accelle
On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 10:28 +0100, Rob McMahon wrote:
> Oct 7 05:17:21 wonky gdm-binary[6857]: [ID 702911 daemon.warning]
> WARNING: gdm_slave_xioerror_handler: Fatal X error - Restarting :0
Today I filed a bug about that one:
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=11775
>
> I'll fi
On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 18:21 -0800, david.co...@sun.com wrote:
> The OpenSolaris development package repository
>
> http://pkg.opensolaris.org/dev/
>
> has been updated to reflect the changes up to and including snv_127 for
> both x86/x64 and SPARC platforms. This update includes fixes to t
On Sun, 2009-11-15 at 07:57 -0500, Sebastien Roy wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-11-15 at 12:30 +0100, Christian Thalinger wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 18:21 -0800, david.co...@sun.com wrote:
> > > The OpenSolaris development package repository
> > >
> > &
On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 09:19 +0100, Gilles Gravier wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Just tried to run a ./configure for aMSN ... and I get "you do not seem
> to have gstreamer and farsight2 installed".
>
> So... I agree for farsight2... but I do have gstreamer libs installed.
> My gues is that it's missing -dev
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 17:14 +, Chris Ridd wrote:
> On 15 Nov 2009, at 12:57, Sebastien Roy wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2009-11-15 at 12:30 +0100, Christian Thalinger wrote:
> >> On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 18:21 -0800, david.co...@sun.com wrote:
> >>> The OpenSolar
On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 17:36 +0100, Detlef Drewanz wrote:
> With b129, some changes happened with the font structure in
> OpenSolaris. For me this means that my installed Arial fonts again are
> away and thus all my presentations have now misaligned text. I am now
> wondering what to do.
> 1. Do
On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 18:00 +0100, Detlef Drewanz wrote:
> >> 2. Install the arial fonts again ? But what's the best place now ? Is
> >> there a ~/.xyz directory which will be scanned for fonts automatically
> >> or do I have to create an entry in /etc/X11/fontpath.d by myself ?
> >>
> >> Any com
On Fri, 2009-12-18 at 19:34 -0800, Ivan Wang wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Not sure if it's a known issue, I didn't find it at d.o.o. The thing
> is I tried putting a system with ASUS P6TD Deluxe and nvidia graphics
> into S3 then resume back.
>
> The system did enter S3, though after resume. It is 100
On Fri, 2009-12-25 at 13:30 -0500, Paul Gress wrote:
> On 12/25/09 05:38 AM, dick hoogendijk wrote:
> > pfexec pkg install SUNWipkg -> 750 new pkgs / 347 MB
> > Is this normal if I want to renew one(1) pkg?
> > This is more like an image-uodate which was refused because an
> > out-of-date SUNWipkg
Sometimes gnome-terminal does heavy disk-reads when I scroll-back the
buffer with a actually not very big scroll-back size and it doesn't get
less when I scroll the same region. So I guess it's not swapping or
something similar. This also happens with a newly started
gnome-terminal instance.
Doe
On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 11:51 +0100, Christian Thalinger wrote:
> Sometimes gnome-terminal does heavy disk-reads when I scroll-back the
> buffer with a actually not very big scroll-back size and it doesn't get
> less when I scroll the same region. So I guess it's not swapping or
On 01/28/10 06:44 PM, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 01/28/10 04:51 AM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
Sometimes gnome-terminal does heavy disk-reads when I scroll-back the
buffer with a actually not very big scroll-back size and it doesn't get
less when I scroll the same region. So I guess it&
On 01/28/10 07:30 PM, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 01/28/10 12:26 PM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
On 01/28/10 06:44 PM, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 01/28/10 04:51 AM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
Sometimes gnome-terminal does heavy disk-reads when I scroll-back the
buffer with a actually not very big
A few days ago I wanted to update my MacBook Pro from b134 to b137 (from
the internal repository) and I got an error like:
pkg: unable to activate opensolaris-137
After asking some questions in #opensolaris (thanks for your help) I
noticed that this is EFI related.
Just for a test I booted back
On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 10:36 -0500, Shawn Walker wrote:
> > What confuses me is that the update from b133 to b134 obviously worked
> > before--because I have a b134 image--but it doesn't now.
>
> I'm on b135 myself and haven't seen this issue yet.
>
> > I can't think of anything I did that changed
On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 11:18 -0500, Shawn Walker wrote:
> >> How are you booting the
> >> system? (rEFIt?)
> >
> > No, I just installed OpenSolaris.
>
> Ah, only OS then?
Yes.
>
> ...
> >> Only bug I see possibly related is 6929493 (in the sense that changes
> >> for the bug may have triggered t
On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 12:13 -0600, Evan Layton wrote:
> On 5/4/10 11:09 AM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 11:18 -0500, Shawn Walker wrote:
> >>>> How are you booting the
> >>>> system? (rEFIt?)
> >>>
> >>&g
On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 16:19 -0600, Evan Layton wrote:
> Can you try the following and see if it really thinks it's an EFI lable?
> # dd if=/dev/dsk/c12t0d0s2 of=x skip=512 bs=1 count=10
> # cat x
>
> This may help us determine if this is another instance of bug 6860320
# dd if=/dev/dsk/c12t0d0s2
On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 09:45 -0600, Evan Layton wrote:
> No that doesn't appear like an EFI label. So it appears that ZFS
> is seeing something there that it's interpreting as an EFI label.
> Then the command to set the bootfs property is failing due to that.
>
> To restate the problem the BE can't
On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 10:35 -0600, Evan Layton wrote:
> >> Do you have any of the older BEs like build 134 that you can boot back
> >> to and see if those will allow you to set the bootfs property on the
> >> root pool? It's just really strange that out of nowhere it started
> >> thinking that the
37 matches
Mail list logo
