Re: [indiana-discuss] Sun Studio

2009-10-22 Thread Enrico Maria Crisostomo
The installation procedure for OpenSolaris is reported, for example, on Sun Studio home page on Sun website: http://developers.sun.com/sunstudio/downloads/index.jsp By the way, it's even reported on OpenSolaris.com (Customize your system): http://www.opensolaris.com/use/customize/ Or, by searchin

Re: [indiana-discuss] how to discover if a CPU has VT-x or AMD-V cap

2009-10-15 Thread Enrico Maria Crisostomo
This is the easiest way I found: http://thegreyblog.blogspot.com/2009/01/how-to-determine-if-your-cpu-is-hvm.html Hope this helps, Enrico Sent from this locked up thing called iPhone... On Oct 15, 2009, at 16:23, Luca Morettoni wrote: As a subject, is possible to discover if a CPU has the har

Re: [indiana-discuss] SUNWttf-fonts-core upgrade partially fails (b104->b110->b113)

2009-05-04 Thread Enrico Maria Crisostomo
de_log from b104 to build 110 to attach to the bugid. >>> >>> Thanks !!! >>> >>> >> >> >> I noticed a font problem on my nv112 SXCE and nv113. After reading >> here I notice SUNWttf-fonts-core package had similar problems. I was >> abl

Re: [indiana-discuss] SUNWttf-fonts-core upgrade partially fails (b104->b110->b113)

2009-05-04 Thread Enrico Maria Crisostomo
Blastwave's packages) by this time. Nevertheless, I'll try it and let you know. Cheers, Enrico Shawn Walker wrote: > Enrico Maria Crisostomo wrote: >> Hi all. >> >> Some time ago I live upgraded a SXCE from build 104 to build 110. The >> upgrade log showed th

[indiana-discuss] SUNWttf-fonts-core upgrade partially fails (b104->b110->b113)

2009-05-04 Thread Enrico Maria Crisostomo
Hi all. Some time ago I live upgraded a SXCE from build 104 to build 110. The upgrade log showed that SUNWttf-fonts-core package installation partially failed and since that moment some Blastwave's programs previously working stopped functioning. Xine, for example, core dumps saying: enr...@solar

Re: [indiana-discuss] [osol-discuss] why gnu chmod in os2008.11?

2009-01-18 Thread Enrico Maria Crisostomo
e way, thanks to point out my obvious mistake. On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 6:27 PM, Joerg Schilling wrote: > Enrico Maria Crisostomo wrote: > >> For as rare as such an event could be, I was affected by this: more >> than once GNU tar couldn't extract it's own files while f

Re: [indiana-discuss] [osol-discuss] why gnu chmod in os2008.11?

2009-01-18 Thread Enrico Maria Crisostomo
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 12:31 AM, Alan Coopersmith wrote: > > Enrico Maria Crisostomo wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 7:35 PM, Alan Coopersmith >> wrote: >>> Brian Smith wrote: >>>> If a GNU utility is a proper superset of the Solaris version, would patc

Re: [indiana-discuss] [osol-discuss] why gnu chmod in os2008.11?

2009-01-18 Thread Enrico Maria Crisostomo
For as rare as such an event could be, I was affected by this: more than once GNU tar couldn't extract it's own files while fortunately pax could. I had to back up some big directories with GNU tar on Solaris 10 and sometimes it happened that tar exited with exit status 0 doing nothing. Archives we

Re: [indiana-discuss] [osol-discuss] why gnu chmod in os2008.11?

2009-01-16 Thread Enrico Maria Crisostomo
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 7:35 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote: > > Brian Smith wrote: > > If a GNU utility is a proper superset of the Solaris version, would patches > > to replace the Solaris version with the GNU version be accepted? > > I would think so, but it would depend on specific cases. > > > Or

Re: [indiana-discuss] Access a Windows Server

2008-08-26 Thread Enrico Maria Crisostomo
Yes: rdesktop. You can install the package pkg:/SUNWrdesktop from OpenSolaris package repository. Bye, Enrico On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 12:22 AM, Thiago Pereira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Hi guys, > > Sometimes I need to access some Windows servers (remote desktop), than I > need to boot my Open

Re: [indiana-discuss] http://pkg.opensolaris.org/ package repository update (build 94)

2008-07-29 Thread Enrico Maria Crisostomo
I also tried to update the system from 93 and everything appeared to be fine. When I rebooted the machine (a Sun Ultra 20 M2), the system wouldn't start and a column with 6 "smile characters" was the only thing that was shown on the screen. I deleted the BE and I'm trying to update the image one mo

Re: [indiana-discuss] pkg image-update reinstall removed packages?

2008-07-29 Thread Enrico Maria Crisostomo
No, I think it's by design. The package entire@ references all of the repository packages. Enrico On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Luca Morettoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Only a little question, before I did snv_91 to snv_93 upgrade I removed > some packages (like some unused i18n languages)

Re: [indiana-discuss] Has anybody installed Sun Java Web Infrastructure Suite on OpenSolaris

2008-07-17 Thread Enrico Maria Crisostomo
, then you might be > able to proceed with the installation but still not officially supported. > Now, if you are interested in running Sun Web Server 7, then you can do > something like given here - > http://blogs.sun.com/natarajan/entry/installing_web_server_7_in1 > > Than

Re: [indiana-discuss] Has anybody installed Sun Java Web Infrastructure Suite on OpenSolaris

2008-07-16 Thread Enrico Maria Crisostomo
The stack trace is the following: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/temp/java_es-5u1-websuite/Solaris_x86$ pfexec ./installer InvocationTargetException in ArchiveReader constructornull java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)

[indiana-discuss] Has anybody installed Sun Java Web Infrastructure Suite on OpenSolaris?

2008-07-16 Thread Enrico Maria Crisostomo
Hi. I wanted to run a test drive of Sun Java Web Infrastructure Suite on OpenSolaris (just upgraded to 93). Yesterday I tried to launch the Solaris 10 installer but Java crashed complaining about a library it could not link to (I should double check but it should be libawt). My questions are: has

Re: [indiana-discuss] Font issues after upgrading to snv_93

2008-07-14 Thread Enrico Maria Crisostomo
Yes I am and the only solution I've found so far is using neither "Best contrast" nor "Subpixel smoothing" in System/Appearence/Fonts. By the way, I also noticed that the problem appears at certain font dimensions, at least for the monospace font: the default 10pt monospace terminal font "m" charac