Re: [efloraofindia:429209] Re: Ranunculus brotherusii ?- Hunder, in Nubra, Ladakh

Good catch Garg ji of this not so common species. On Friday, July 22, 2022 at 10:28:36 PM UTC+5:30 Saroj Kumar Kasaju wrote: > > Thank you Mr. Garg ! > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 8:56 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Thanks a lot, Rawat ji >> >> On Fri, 22 Jul 2022 at 20:39, GOPAL SING

Re: [efloraofindia:429208] Re: Cerastium glomeratum- Hunder, Nubra, Ladakh

Yes Garg ji, very good clicks On Friday, July 22, 2022 at 10:28:51 PM UTC+5:30 Saroj Kumar Kasaju wrote: > > Thank you Mr. Garg ! > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 8:56 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Thanks, Saroj ji >> >> On Fri, 22 Jul 2022 at 20:32, Saroj Kasaju wrote: >> >>> POWO, GB

Re: [efloraofindia:429207] Re: Delphinium ?- South Pullu in Ladakh

G. pratense is another possibility On Saturday, July 23, 2022 at 10:30:36 AM UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: > Some possibility of this being *Geranium himalayense* Klotzsch > , > > although it is difficult to confirm

[efloraofindia:429206] Re: Bistorta vivipara- Hunder, Nubra, Ladakh

Yes Garg ji, beautiful images On Saturday, July 23, 2022 at 8:59:46 PM UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: > Attaching more images. > > On Fri, 22 Jul 2022 at 21:43, J.M. Garg wrote: > >> In the wild area of a hotel, in Hunder, in Nubra, Ladakh, on 16.6.22. >> -- >> With regards, >> J.M.Garg >> > > > -- >

[efloraofindia:429204] Regarding a query

Dear respected members , I have a question regarding Sundar Nursery , New Delhi If anyone knows where is timber section located inside the nursery. i have visited there but unable to find it as in FOI website and other books like Trees of delhi they have mentioned many trees name in that particular

Re: [efloraofindia:429203] Re: Medicago × varia- Ule, Ladakh

Thanks, Singh ji -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Thu, 28 Jul, 2022, 3:59 pm Gurcharan Singh, wrote: > Very good upload Garg ji, closeup of fruit would have clinched the ID. > > On Monday, July 25, 2022 at 5:00:34 PM UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: > >> Attaching more images. >> >> On Sun, 24 Jul 2022 at

Re: [efloraofindia:429202] Re: Hippophae rhamnoides subsp. turkestanica- Ule, Ladakh

Thanks, Singh ji -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Thu, 28 Jul, 2022, 4:00 pm Gurcharan Singh, wrote: > Yes Garg ji, very common in the area. > > On Monday, July 25, 2022 at 4:17:24 PM UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: > >> Along the roadside, in Ule (10,000 ft.) Ladakh, on 14.6.22. >> -- >> With regards, >

[efloraofindia:429201] Re: SK 3011 03 October 2021

Dear Mr. Garg, I am still confused about the ID .Please have a look at the following links: https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:1014629-1 https://www.gbif.org/species/3972771 Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Sat, Oct 9, 2021 at 1:46 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > I do not think so. >

[efloraofindia:429200] Fwd: Fern for id 280722SV2

Thanks a lot, Chris ji -- With regards, J. M. Garg -- Forwarded message - From: Chris Fraser-Jenkins <> Date: Thu, 28 Jul, 2022, 7:09 pm Subject: Re: Fern for id 280722SV2 To: J.M. Garg Nephrolepis - perhaps falciformmis, but no sori and not good photos, so no, I am not able to

[efloraofindia:429199] Fwd: Fern for id 280722SV1

Thanks a lot, Chris ji -- With regards, J. M. Garg -- Forwarded message - From: Chris Fraser-Jenkins <> Date: Thu, 28 Jul, 2022, 7:06 pm Subject: Re: Fern for id 280722SV1 To: J.M. Garg This is a Tectaria, but photos not showing enough or clearly enough to see which. Near T. c

[efloraofindia:429199] Re: Rorippa palustris (L.) Besser ?- Ladakh

Very good captures Garg ji. On Sunday, July 24, 2022 at 8:59:01 AM UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: > Thanks a lot, Rawat ji, for the id. > Yes appears close as per images at POWO > . > > On Sun, 24 Jul 2022 at 07:14, GOPAL SINGH Rawat

Fwd: [efloraofindia:429197] Leucas sp. from Assam KD 04 Jun'22

Thanks, Karuna ji -- Forwarded message - From: 'kd_...@rediffmail.com' via eFloraofIndia < indiantreepix@googlegroups.com> Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2022 at 19:41 Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:428883] Leucas sp. from Assam KD 04 Jun'22 To: eFloraofIndia Thank You Sir for your resp

Fwd: [efloraofindia:429194] MS,July,2022/08 Calamus sp. for id.

Thanks a lot, Henderson ji -- Forwarded message - From: Henderson, Andrew Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2022 at 16:30 Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:428853] MS,July,2022/08 Calamus sp. for id. To: J.M. Garg Calamus possibly latifolius or inermis -- *From:* J.M. Garg

Re: [efloraofindia:429192] Re: Need help with ID: Lamiate?

I think you are right Paradesi ji. On Monday, July 25, 2022 at 9:27:27 PM UTC+5:30 paradesia...@gmail.com wrote: > Orthosiphon pallidus, > With regards. > > On Mon, 25 Jul 2022 at 12:14, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > >> Please check Salvia ! >> Thank you. >> >> Saroj Kasaju >> >> >> On Mon, Jul 25, 20

[efloraofindia:429189] Re: Melilotus officinalis- Ule, Ladakh

Nice images Garg ji On Monday, July 25, 2022 at 4:10:07 PM UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: > Attaching more images. > > On Mon, 25 Jul 2022 at 16:08, J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Along the roadside near Indus, in Ule (10,000 ft.) Ladakh, on 14.6.22. >> -- >> With regards, >> J.M.Garg >> > > > -- > With rega

[efloraofindia:429188] Re: Hippophae rhamnoides subsp. turkestanica- Ule, Ladakh

Yes Garg ji, very common in the area. On Monday, July 25, 2022 at 4:17:24 PM UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: > Along the roadside, in Ule (10,000 ft.) Ladakh, on 14.6.22. > -- > With regards, > J.M.Garg > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "eFloraofIndia" gr

[efloraofindia:429187] Re: Medicago × varia- Ule, Ladakh

Very good upload Garg ji, closeup of fruit would have clinched the ID. On Monday, July 25, 2022 at 5:00:34 PM UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: > Attaching more images. > > On Sun, 24 Jul 2022 at 20:59, J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Along the roadside near Indus, in Ule (10,000 ft.) Ladakh, on 14.6.22. >> Pl. va

Re: [efloraofindia:429184] Re: Populus nigra var. italica- Ule, Ladakh

Thanks, Singh ji -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Thu, 28 Jul, 2022, 3:46 pm Gurcharan Singh, wrote: > Yes Garg ji, nice clicks > > On Monday, July 25, 2022 at 5:35:19 PM UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: > >> Attaching one more image. >> >> On Mon, 25 Jul 2022 at 17:34, J.M. Garg wrote: >> >>> Along the

Re: [efloraofindia:429184] Re: Salix alba

Thanks, Singh ji -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Thu, 28 Jul, 2022, 3:45 pm Gurcharan Singh, wrote: > Nice clicks Garg ji > > On Tuesday, July 26, 2022 at 10:08:31 AM UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: > >> Thanks, Shakir ji >> >> On Tue, 26 Jul 2022 at 08:13, Shakir Ahmad wrote: >> >>> Yes Salix alba >>>

[efloraofindia:429184] Re: Populus nigra var. italica- Ule, Ladakh

Yes Garg ji, nice clicks On Monday, July 25, 2022 at 5:35:19 PM UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: > Attaching one more image. > > On Mon, 25 Jul 2022 at 17:34, J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Along the roadside, in Ule (10,000 ft.) Ladakh, on 14.6.22. >> -- >> With regards, >> J.M.Garg >> > > > -- > With regards

[efloraofindia:429183] Re: Salix alba

Nice clicks Garg ji On Tuesday, July 26, 2022 at 10:08:31 AM UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: > Thanks, Shakir ji > > On Tue, 26 Jul 2022 at 08:13, Shakir Ahmad wrote: > >> Yes Salix alba >> >> On Mon, 25 Jul, 2022, 5:21 pm J.M. Garg, wrote: >> >>> Attaching more images. >>> >>> On Mon, 25 Jul 2022 at 1

Re: [efloraofindia:429182] Identification required for this sp.1132 from kashmir

Saroj ji it depends on which database you are following If you follow POWO it will have distribution as indicated by me If you follow COL which considers S. latijugum as synonym of S. medium, naturally it will combine distribution of both. On Tuesday, July 26, 2022 at 1:39:58 PM UTC+5:30 Saroj Ku

Re: [efloraofindia:429180] Re: SK 2627 28 May 2020

Thanks, Saroj ji -- With regards, J. M. Garg On Thu, 28 Jul, 2022, 3:06 pm Gurcharan Singh, wrote: > I would take it as E. sessile > > On Tuesday, July 26, 2022 at 4:50:27 PM UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: > >> I am having doubts about this id as E.punctatum as per POWO >>

Re: [efloraofindia:429179] Passiflora sp. from Assam KD 02 Jul 22

Appears to be some hybrid. On Sat, 23 Jul 2022 at 19:32, 'kd_...@rediffmail.com' via eFloraofIndia < indiantreepix@googlegroups.com> wrote: > Grown as ornamental plant. > Thank You Sir. > With regards > Karuna Kanta Das > > On Saturday, 23 July 2022 at 02:02:04 UTC+5:30 Saroj Kumar Kasaju wrote:

[efloraofindia:429179] Re: SK 2627 28 May 2020

I would take it as E. sessile On Tuesday, July 26, 2022 at 4:50:27 PM UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: > I am having doubts about this id as E.punctatum as per POWO > > specimen- one and two

[efloraofindia:429178] Re: SK 2787 17 October 2020

Garg ji, I have requested earlier also we have to decide which database we are following (I prefer POWO). POWO treats E. punctatum (Buch.-Ham ex D Don) Wedd.as accepted name distributed in Himalaya and China, and E. grande (Wedd._ P S Green native to Norfolk Is. FBI treats this as variety of E.

Re: [efloraofindia:429175] Re: MS,July,2022/06 Elaeocarpus sp.(floribundus?) for confirmation/id

Yes, close to images and details at https://efloraofindia.com/2021/03/12/elaeocarpus-floribundus/ On Sat, 23 Jul 2022 at 16:13, J.M. Garg wrote: > Thanks a lot, Sawmliana ji > > -- Forwarded message - > From: M Sawmliana > Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2022 at 14:33 > Subject: Re: [efloraof

Fwd: [efloraofindia:429174] Mandla_Cyperaceae

Thanks a lot, Prasad ji -- With regards, J. M. Garg -- Forwarded message - From: PRASAD V.P. <> Date: Thu, 28 Jul, 2022, 12:55 pm Subject: Re: [efloraofindia:428155] Mandla_Cyperaceae To: J.M. Garg Looks like *Cyperus cyperoides* V.P. Prasad On Wednesday, 20 July, 2022 at 1

Re: [efloraofindia:429173] Peperomia obtusifolia (L.) A.Dietr.

Thank you Gurucharan Sir! Saroj Kasaju On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 11:05 AM Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Simplest way to convert Heic files to JPG, open in Paint and save as JPG. > In Windows although thumbnails of Heic Files are seen, once you click > them, they simply get downloaded without opening

[efloraofindia:429172] Re: SK 3587 22 July 2022

Thank you Mr. Garg ! Saroj Kasaju On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 12:21 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > Pl. check > *Laportea bulbifera* (Siebold & Zucc.) Wedd. > > > On Sat, 23 Jul 2022 at 06:40, J.M. Garg wrote: > >> Pl. check https://efloraofindia.c

[efloraofindia:429171] Re: Pimpinella diversifolia DC.

Yes Mr Garg ! Thank you. Saroj Kasaju On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 1:01 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > I think it is more close to the images at *Sanicula elata* Buch.-Ham. ex > D. Don > > > On Sat, 23 Jul 2022 at 07:48, Saroj Kasa

[efloraofindia:429170] Re: Pimpinella diversifolia DC.

I think it is more close to the images at *Sanicula elata* Buch.-Ham. ex D. Don On Sat, 23 Jul 2022 at 07:48, Saroj Kasaju wrote: > Thank you Mr. Garg. > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Sat, 23 Jul 2022 at 6:56 am, J.M. Garg wro

[efloraofindia:429170] Re: SK 3038 12 October 2021

Please read below comment of mine on this post by Dinesh ji VoF Week :: DV :: 02 AUG 12 - 1257 :: small herb with tiny pink flower at Valley of Flowers (google.com) Dinesh ji perhaps your another visit may not be necessary if you go th