Re: [infinispan-dev] ISPN-263 and handling partitions

2013-04-23 Thread Bela Ban
right On 4/23/13 7:26 PM, Manik Surtani wrote: > > On 23 Apr 2013, at 16:37, Bela Ban wrote: > >> >> >> On 4/22/13 6:46 PM, Manik Surtani wrote: >>> >>> On 22 Apr 2013, at 16:46, Mircea Markus wrote: >>> would the read only partition be wiped out and repopulated during merge? >>> >>> N

Re: [infinispan-dev] Removal of AS7 compatibility parsers

2013-04-23 Thread Galder Zamarreño
On Apr 18, 2013, at 2:33 PM, Sanne Grinovero wrote: > Can't we converge on one format in the future? > As any converted or dual parser will have it's own set of bugs. ^ Didn't we discusss the possibility of this in Mallorca and decided against it? I think I remember suggesting it, but got nega

Re: [infinispan-dev] How to run the testsuite?

2013-04-23 Thread Galder Zamarreño
Nice :) On Apr 18, 2013, at 6:43 AM, Mircea Markus wrote: > Now the suite is forks a new process for each module. I've complete the run > with 128m MaxPerm. > > On 20 Mar 2013, at 23:55, Sanne Grinovero wrote: >> Thanks Dan, >> with the following options it completed the build: >> >> MAVEN_OP

Re: [infinispan-dev] Querying in Infinispan

2013-04-23 Thread Galder Zamarreño
I've found some info, but can't find it all. I need to check in my backup hard drive. Cheers, On Apr 15, 2013, at 11:51 AM, Manik Surtani wrote: > Galder, can you share your work on cross-platform serialisation when you > picked Avro some while back as your preferred portable serialisation la

Re: [infinispan-dev] ISPN-263 and handling partitions

2013-04-23 Thread Manik Surtani
On 23 Apr 2013, at 16:37, Bela Ban wrote: > > > On 4/22/13 6:46 PM, Manik Surtani wrote: >> >> On 22 Apr 2013, at 16:46, Mircea Markus wrote: >> >>> would the read only partition be wiped out and repopulated during >>> merge? >> >> Naively, yes. But as Dan pointed out, if a key K only exi

Re: [infinispan-dev] JCache implementation documentation

2013-04-23 Thread cotton-ben
Very nice work Galder. Couple of questions re: Infinispan 5.3.0 ambitions/capabilities to provide JSR-107 transactions option. 1. We noticed on your GitHub branch that you have JCACHE Transactions test code. The code uses javax.transaction.TransactionManager (ajuna implementation). Will you

Re: [infinispan-dev] ISPN-263 and handling partitions

2013-04-23 Thread Bela Ban
On 4/22/13 6:46 PM, Manik Surtani wrote: > > On 22 Apr 2013, at 16:46, Mircea Markus wrote: > >> would the read only partition be wiped out and repopulated during >> merge? > > Naively, yes. But as Dan pointed out, if a key K only exists in the > minor partition (primary and backups), then just

[infinispan-dev] JCache implementation documentation

2013-04-23 Thread Galder Zamarreño
Hi all, I've written up some documentation on JCache and Infinispan's implementation of the spec [1]. The documentation is not complete, but will be completed ahead of the final Infinispan 5.3.0.Final release. A lot of what's in there is what I actually talked about in Brazil's JUDCon JSR-107

[infinispan-dev] Infinispan Query tests development: focus!

2013-04-23 Thread Sanne Grinovero
Hi all, needing your advice to define the most suited level of coupling we want of tests in Query towards Lucene API and other behavior which it is not responsible for. Recently the amount of tests added to Query has been significantly reinforced; this is very welcome as it was highly needed, but