So you reckon we're better off looking at Sanne's design for transferring locks
and state separately? Sanne, when you do have a moment, it would be good to
document this up on the wiki and share it. :)
On 26 Jan 2012, at 17:43, Dan Berindei wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Manik Sur
On 1/26/12 5:43 PM, Dan Berindei wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Manik Surtani wrote:
>> On 26 Jan 2012, at 16:05, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
>>
>>> On 26 January 2012 10:36, Manik Surtani wrote:
Dan,
Looking through what we currently have, given the blocking nature of state
> Well, thats what I want to try and understand. If periodic flushing is
> easier/quicker/less risky to implement, I think we could do it for 5.2.0. :)
>
> Sanne, have you documented your design on separate transfer of state vs locks
> on the wiki somewhere? I'd be curious to see what Paolo a
On 26 Jan 2012, at 10:36, Manik Surtani wrote:
> Dan,
>
> Looking through what we currently have, given the blocking nature of state
> transfer, I wonder if we can improve on it by pausing the state transfer from
> time to time to flush waiting transactions? I.e., if state transfer is in
> p
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Manik Surtani wrote:
>
> On 26 Jan 2012, at 16:05, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
>
>> On 26 January 2012 10:36, Manik Surtani wrote:
>>> Dan,
>>>
>>> Looking through what we currently have, given the blocking nature of state
>>> transfer, I wonder if we can improve on i
On 26 Jan 2012, at 16:05, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> On 26 January 2012 10:36, Manik Surtani wrote:
>> Dan,
>>
>> Looking through what we currently have, given the blocking nature of state
>> transfer, I wonder if we can improve on it by pausing the state transfer
>> from time to time to flush
On 26 January 2012 10:36, Manik Surtani wrote:
> Dan,
>
> Looking through what we currently have, given the blocking nature of state
> transfer, I wonder if we can improve on it by pausing the state transfer from
> time to time to flush waiting transactions? I.e., if state transfer is in
> pro
Dan,
Looking through what we currently have, given the blocking nature of state
transfer, I wonder if we can improve on it by pausing the state transfer from
time to time to flush waiting transactions? I.e., if state transfer is in
progress and a write command or transaction is waiting for it
