One way to do it is use a distributed cache with two different marshallers:
JBMAR and protostream. Admittedly this won't measure only the serialisation
performance, but include other stuff as well, such as network time (I guess you
can remove this from the result though).
This way we would
On Feb 3, 2014, at 6:24 PM, Galder Zamarreño gal...@redhat.com wrote:
Not sure I understand the need to compare this.
JBMAR and ProtoStream are solving different problems. The former is focused
on getting the best out of Java persistence. The latter is focused on
serializing stuff in a
Not sure I understand the need to compare this.
JBMAR and ProtoStream are solving different problems. The former is focused on
getting the best out of Java persistence. The latter is focused on serializing
stuff in a plattform independent way.
IMO, it’s not an apples to apples comparison.
Not 100% related to what you are asking about but have a look at this
post and the discussion that erupted:
http://gridgain.blogspot.ca/2012/12/java-serialization-good-fast-and-faster.html
Vladimir
On 1/30/2014, 7:13 AM, Adrian Nistor wrote:
Hi list!
I've been pondering about re-using the
Thanks Vladimir! It's a really fun and interesting discussion going on
there :)
On 01/31/2014 06:29 PM, Vladimir Blagojevic wrote:
Not 100% related to what you are asking about but have a look at this
post and the discussion that erupted:
Hi list!
I've been pondering about re-using the marshalling machinery of
Infinispan in another project, specifically in ProtoStream, where I'm
planning to add it as a test scoped dependency so I can create a
benchmark to compare marshalling performace. I'm basically interested
in comparing
