::I have just read that Mailman can be used to produce a
::Majordomo type roster of users, by email request (necessary,
::as I do not have shell access to the Mailman host) -- If I can
::get that roster (a couple thousand names), I will issue a
::serialized vacation tracer to each user, and
Dror == info-cvs-admin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dror Hi,=20 I think I need to clarify myself a little, what am I
Dror looking for is not a Visual Studio (.NET) plugin for CVS.
Dror My team is working on an Intranet project and using Visual
Dror Studio .NET. While we where
Reading from the CVS (info) manual [keyword substitution / using
keywords]:
To include a keyword string you simply include the relevant text
string, such as `$Id$', inside the file, and commit the file. CVS
will automatically expand the string *as part of the commit
operation*.
Is this
Todd Denniston writes:
This is the point where you set down, add up what it
will cost your company to support your number of users
by putting addons on a ''cheapskates'' version control
system to support its use in the companies IP policy setup.
Oh, please..
Well, is it the consensus of the
I cannot seem to locate loginfo.pl. According to some posts its in the
source distribtion, so I downloaded the source to CVS from www.cvshome.org,
but didn't see it.
Could somebody please send me a loginfo.pl and the line from loginfo that
calls it.
Thanks a bunch,
Brian
Nick Patavalis writes:
Is this true? I thought that expansion occured as a part of the
*export* (cvs checkout, cvs diff, cvs export, etc) operations.
Both are correct. The actual process of expanding keywords happens
during checkout, but committing a file containing keywords triggers an
Stefan Monnier [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Forrest == Forrest Samuels [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My company is developing a Java application that we are releasing on
several different platforms. We initially released it on Windows and
then
Larry Jones wrote:
A bit of both, I suspect.
That's good to know.
In any case, I'll take a closer look at the CVSNT stuff (I wish they
hadn't gone and reformatted all their sources so much :-/), and see
what's portable back to the main line..
Some basic features (cvs passwd, cvs ls,
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 03:43:04PM -0800, Andy Glew wrote:
I originally posted this to the newsgroup fa.info-cvs, but it
appears to be oneway. Pardon if this is a repost.
[It isn't. But only the (sparsely-tagged) HTML was readable in
my plain-text mail client; the text version was all run
[ On Tuesday, October 29, 2002 at 09:10:44 (-0800), Shankar Unni wrote: ]
Subject: RE: Per-modules readers/writers ?
Well, is it the consensus of the maintainers that they will *never*
accept any access control feature patches for CVS?
Nobody can arrive at any consensus on this kind of thing
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 10:28:25AM -0800, Shankar Unni wrote:
In any case, I'll take a closer look at the CVSNT stuff (I wish they
hadn't gone and reformatted all their sources so much :-/), and see
what's portable back to the main line..
GNU wdiff might be useful. It's a diff that's
The consensus of the maintainers has historically been to never add features
that they don't personally need, unless somneone supplies code, documentation,
and a regression suite. And then it gets integrated at their discretion.
There are already at least two major splinter groups using features
[ On Tuesday, October 29, 2002 at 10:28:25 (-0800), Shankar Unni wrote: ]
Subject: RE: Per-modules readers/writers ?
In any case, I'll take a closer look at the CVSNT stuff (I wish they
hadn't gone and reformatted all their sources so much :-/), and see
what's portable back to the main line..
Todd Denniston writes:
This is the point where you set down, add up what it
will cost your company to support your number of users
by putting addons on a ''cheapskates'' version control
system to support its use in the companies IP policy setup.
For rational values of company, of
I think this discussion has hit a wall, but I'll answer these points
anyway. But I'm no longer pushing for such a feature to be included,
because of the obvious reluctance of so many, so we can let this
discussion drift away..
Greg Woods wrote:
If you're happy without real security then why
[ On Tuesday, October 29, 2002 at 13:47:05 (-0800), Shankar Unni wrote: ]
Subject: RE: Per-modules readers/writers ?
Cost? Utility? Stability?
Good questions. What are _your_ answers?
(And besides, is it your contention that
Linux filesystem security is real security? All I have to do is
hi all,
i was wondering if anyone had a simple script where you could say:
script.pl modulename message.* TEMP_TAG
(or similar) and it would tag each file with that message -- throwing an
error if it didn't.
I know this sounds kinda specific but hopefully someone has already needed
it. I want
Hi
Is there anyway to checkout the repository such that I
can exclude some files?These files are needed for an
older release but in the current version they are not
needed.I know we can make a branch, but is there any
other method to exclude just some files from
checkout?They are in different
18 matches
Mail list logo
