Hi,
we have working repository running right now. Currently the mode of
authentication is .rhosts.
We are planning to migrate the mode of authentication to pserver. Also
after moving to pserver mode we should be
able have all the versions we have right now.
My question is, whether it is enough
I've seen problems like this due to network card problems.
Do/does the system(s) in question exhibit any problem when moving multiple
files via other means, for example an FTP MGET * operation or SMB multiple
file copy operation?
Does it make a difference if the machines are on a 10 or 100
At 06:28 AM 11/12/2002, you wrote:
I've seen problems like this due to network card problems.
Do/does the system(s) in question exhibit any problem when moving multiple
files via other means, for example an FTP MGET * operation or SMB multiple
file copy operation?
I'm not using SMB between
Mahantesh writes:
we have working repository running right now. Currently the mode of
authentication is .rhosts.
We are planning to migrate the mode of authentication to pserver.
Why? :ext: is generally consider superior to :pserver:, particularly
when used with ssh rather than rsh.
My
Kai Peter Ford writes:
However, an scp of a single large (~16MB) file from the W2K system
to the repository system exhibits slow and sporadic throughput of
~0-100 Kbps. The same operation to a different Linux system
completed normally with 1Mbps consistent throughput. Could there
be
[ On Tuesday, November 12, 2002 at 19:28:49 (+0530), Mahantesh wrote: ]
Subject: Moving to Pserver from .rhosts
we have working repository running right now. Currently the mode of
authentication is .rhosts.
We are planning to migrate the mode of authentication to pserver. Also
after moving
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 02:40:07PM -0500, MacMunn, Robert wrote:
I am building CVS on Solaris 8.
pebblebeach# make
[...]
server.c, line 5980: undefined symbol: GSS_C_NT_HOSTBASED_SERVICE
server.c, line 5981: warning: improper pointer/integer combination: arg #3
cc: acomp failed for
Hi all!
I just recently got my rather small development team to agree on start using
CVS which I hope will turn out great for all of us. Previously, there has
been no mans of controlling versions of files - at best, someone has updated
a version number in some comment at the head of the files,
Hi All,
I'm using cvs2cl to generate version differences on branches, but I'm having
trouble with picking up changes where no change was previously there. I
think the problem is one in cvs log, though, not cvs2cl.
Here's the command I use
cvs2cl -w -f ChangeLog_%1_To_%2.txt -r%1::%2
the
