- Original Message -
From: Paul Sander [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There's Noel Yap's patches on SourceForge, which apply to a down-rev
release
of CVS. I believe that others have implemented it as well, but only
privately
in their own shops. Maybe they don't advertise them for fear of being
Hi,
I was trying to build the latest development version of CVS on Windows using
VC++
and it turns out that the CVS tree is possibly broken. Here is what I get in
the build log:
Configuration: cvsnt - Win32 Debug
Compiling...
client.c
Derek,
I think that Anke Koelzer meant that it would be great to be able to
download all these HTML files created and placed on the cvshome.org. Why not
zip it and allow people to download in one package? It would reduce the
traffic to the site and help people a lot. HTML format can be handled
Derek,
I think that Anke Koelzer meant that it would be great to be able to
download all these HTML files created and placed on the cvshome.org. Why not
zip it and allow people to download in one package? It would reduce the
traffic to the site and help people a lot. HTML format can be handled
Hi,
Here is the patch (diff actually) that will fix the problem of building the
Windows version of cvs.exe - the file annotate.c was missing from the
cvsnt.dsp project file.
Best Regards,
Jerzy
cvs -z4 diff cvsnt.dsp (in directory D:\ccvs\ccvs)
Index: cvsnt.dsp
Unix box. I think it would really be nice if we have the zip file
available to download from cvshome.org so folks that don't have a Unix box
at hand can eventually try to build the stuff.
Best Regards,
Jerzy
- Original Message -
From: Dennis Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jerzy Kaczorowski
Hi,
We've recently received a bug report [number 470] on the cvsgui project that
seems to be originating from CVS source, so I thought I will CC it here:
The new function 'C' is missing from source/update.c, should be:
static const char *const update_usage[] =
{
"Usage: %s %s [-APCdflRp]
Dear CVS developers,
I am watching the thread of "split for rcvs" and "locking and other patches"
and I must say that I am quite shocked.
Why is that the requirements for sending the patches are getting more hard
every day?
The conditions to accept the patches are quite too difficult to comply
