(I hate not being able to reply to the messages, but either I'm having
problems getting email from the list or my filters rae eating the
messages. Could be worse: they could be spitting out nastygrams ;^))
Greg:
I do agree with the bit about not allowing code out of control without a
tag. In f
[ On Thursday, April 19, 2001 at 11:01:27 (-0500), David D. Hagood wrote: ]
> Subject: $Name $ and branches
>
> Is there some logic behind this behavior? For some of what I am doing,
> I'd really like to have the $Name$ be replaced with the branch tag.
In CVS $Name is really on
), David D. Hagood wrote: ]
> Subject: $Name $ and branches
>
> Is there some logic behind this behavior? For some of what I am doing,
> I'd really like to have the $Name$ be replaced with the branch tag.
In CVS $Name is really only intended to be used with "cvs export -kv
I'm a little confused by an aspect of CVS:
If I have a file that contains the $Name: $ keyword, and that file is
checked out under a normal, non-branch tag FOO, the keyword will be
expanded as $Name: FOO$. However, if the tag is a branch, the keyword
won't be expanded.
Is there some logic beh
