Greg A. Woods wrote:
1. keep your binary files in a separate manually managed archive.
...
"CVS supports binary files"?!?!?!? No, I don't think so. The '-kb'
"sticky flag" is just a terribly bad hack that gets more people into
more trouble with CVS than you could ever imagine because it gets
mis
[ On Monday, September 8, 2003 at 13:48:30 (-0400), David Clunie wrote: ]
> Subject: Countering the usual diatribe against binary files, was Re: cvs diff,
> proposal for change
>
> We have several terabytes of binary files stored in a CVS repository.
big is not necessarily be
On Mon, 2003-09-08 at 16:00, Greg A. Woods wrote:
> I can import gigabytes and terabytes of binaries into CVS too, but no
> matter how much I try I'll never be able to use branches meaningfully in
> such a repository,
Hm. Do CVS branches not work right with binary files? I've used
repositories
On Tue, 2003-09-09 at 14:53, Greg A. Woods wrote:
> [ On Tuesday, September 9, 2003 at 10:10:46 (-0400), Tom Copeland wrote: ]
> > Subject: Re: Countering the usual diatribe against binary files, was Re:cvs
> > diff, proposal for change
> >
> > Hm. Do CVS branches
[ On Tuesday, September 9, 2003 at 10:10:46 (-0400), Tom Copeland wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: Countering the usual diatribe against binary files, was Re: cvs
> diff, proposal for change
>
> Hm. Do CVS branches not work right with binary files?
It depends on what you mean by &quo
> On Tue, 2003-09-09 at 14:53, Greg A. Woods wrote:
> > [ On Tuesday, September 9, 2003 at 10:10:46 (-0400), Tom Copeland wrote: ]
> > > Subject: Re: Countering the usual diatribe against binary files, was Re: cvs
> > > diff, proposal for change
> > >
>
