On Feb 5, 2005, at 12:52 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ On Wednesday, February 2, 2005 at 18:23:08 (-0300), Alexandre
Augusto Drummond Barroso wrote: ]
Subject: RE: Renaming (was Re: 'cvs add' client/server semantics)
I agree with you. I think the result from an annotate would be
[ On Wednesday, February 2, 2005 at 18:23:08 (-0300), Alexandre Augusto
Drummond Barroso wrote: ]
> Subject: RE: Renaming (was Re: 'cvs add' client/server semantics)
>
> I agree with you. I think the result from an annotate would be
> completely different when using a "
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Paul Sander
> Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 9:01 AM
> To: info-cvs@gnu.org
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Renaming (was Re: 'cvs add' client/server semantics)
On Feb 1, 2005, at 1:25 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ On Monday, January 31, 2005 at 08:05:47 (-0800), Mark D. Baushke
wrote: ]
Subject: Re: 'cvs add' client/server semantics (was Re: Triggers)
If I move 'foo.c' to 'bar.c' the CVS/Entries file is going to be
confused.
In general, doing lots of
