Greetings,
I'm trying to set up CVS for a web development project and have come into
what appears to be a minor problem and am looking for advice on the best way
to fix the problem.
We need to all work out of the same directory, which is where the web server
works out of and we can't just set
You want to use UNIX group permissions.
Change the entire repository (including CVSROOT) to be owned by the same
group. Then change everything to have group write access.
Then make sure that everyone you want to be able to access the
repository is a member of that group (no one you don't want t
EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Atkinson, Chip
> Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 12:08 PM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Website development
>
>
> Greetings,
>
> I'm trying to set up CVS for a web development project and have come into
> what app
Atkinson, Chip writes:
>
> Is there some other way that we can all use the same sandbox without
> resorting to a generic login?
Always use the -d global option on the command line -- it overrides
what's in CVS/Repository.
-Larry Jones
Wow, how existential can you get? -- Hobbes
__
Chip
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 1:49 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Website development
>
>
> Atkinson, Chip writes:
> >
> > Is there
Atkinson, Chip writes:
>
> Could you elaborate on this a bit? I looked through the man page on cvs and
> it looks like -d only takes a directory as an argument.
You're probably looking at the -d option for one of the subcommands; I'm
talking about the -d global option that comes before the subc
EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: (bcc: Wayne Johnson/MINN/Candle)
Subject: Website development
Greetings,
I'm trying to set up CVS for a web development project and have come into
what appears to be a minor problem and am looking for advice on the best way
to fix the problem.
We need to all work
x27;
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Website development
Could you elaborate on this a bit? I looked through the man page on cvs and
it looks like -d only takes a directory as an argument. Unfortunately too,
I'm stuck with WinCVS or some other GUI thing that works under Windows for
the rest o
ver the command line
that it sends/uses.
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 3:25 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Website development
>
>
> Don't know how much it will help, but the
ing in to smith@cvshost)
CVS password:
Weird.
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul D. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 1:38 PM
> To: Atkinson, Chip
> Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Re: Website development
>
>
> You
"Atkinson, Chip" wrote:
> It appears that CVSROOT doesn't have any effect over what user is used
> during a cvs login. Thus, even if my CVSROOT is set to
> smith@cvshost:/cvsrep/path
> and I type in cvs login from the W2K command line (cygwin bash shell) I get
>
> (Logging in to catkinson@cvshos
Chris Chambers wrote:
> I've been staring at this ugly fact for a while... if it's at all possible
> to do the gruntwork required to create a sandbox for each developer, I'd
> recommend going that route. Otherwise, I recommend a locking model.
'cvs co projectname'?
Derek
--
Derek Price
"Atkinson, Chip" wrote:
> We need to all work out of the same directory, which is where the web server
> works out of and we can't just set up multiple web servers because it's not
> just a regular Apache or IIS setup.
There have been several threads on this topic recently. You should search on
Atkinson, Chip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We need to all work out of the same directory, which is where the web server
> works out of and we can't just set up multiple web servers because it's not
> just a regular Apache or IIS setup.
>
> When I check out the files for the web site they are "
cvsup ( http://www.polstra.com/projects/freejects/freeware/CVSup/ )
also works rather well. You don't have all the CVS directories
cluttering up the place :)
On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 07:48:12PM -0500, Derek R. Price wrote:
> "Atkinson, Chip" wrote:
>
> > We need to all work out of the same direc
Sorry. I meant to send this to the list rather than directly to the sender.
Chip
-Original Message-
From: Atkinson, Chip
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2001 9:58 AM
To: 'Derek R. Price'
Subject: RE: Website development
I actually did try searching but came up with very little
Chris Chambers wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> > Derek R. Price
> >
> > Chris Chambers wrote:
> >
> > > I've been staring at this ugly fact for a while... if it's at
> > all possible
> > > to do the gruntwork required to c
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2001.02.16 14:50:13
>Another possibility introduces an extra step for everybody, but basically
>allows concurrent development. In that model, developers work in their own
>workspaces then copy files that need testing into the public area or check them
>in and have a check
> > It sounded to me like we had multiple developers sharing one
> CVS account or
> > otherwise editing a CVS module checked out to one place on the
> server, say
> > "/home/http/cgi-bin".
> >
> > My point was, unless we can set up a "cgi-bin" for each
> developer, CVS won't
> > work well in this
PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Website development
>
>
> > > It sounded to me like we had multiple developers sharing one
> > CVS account or
> > > otherwise editing a CVS module checked out to one place on the
> > server, say
> > > "/home/http
"Atkinson, Chip" wrote:
> Thanks for the information. One thing that I've encountered is the need to
> take very tiny steps with web development some times. Part of this is
> because browsers aren't like compilers. Things like
> blah blah blah
> get rendered differently than
>
>
> bla
with many insisting on a GUI, I guess it's WinCVS.
> -Original Message-
> From: David H. Thornley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, February 16, 2001 10:29 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Re: FW: Website development
>
>
>
>
>
ry 16, 2001 10:29 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Re: FW: Website development
>
>
>
>
> "Atkinson, Chip" wrote:
> > Thanks for the information. One thing that I've
> encountered is the need to
> > take very tiny steps with web d
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: FW: Website development
>
>
> It sounds like you're using some sort of content management
> software. I'm not
> 100% decided on this issue, but I'm currently leaning towards
> the i
24 matches
Mail list logo
