[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 03/13/2000 11:47:53 PM
>> >Although I would lean towards honouring the "add" request, it might be
>> >prudent to at least print a warning message indicating that the
>> >directory would normally have been ignored if it had been traversed from
>> >the "root" of the module i
[ On Thursday, March 9, 2000 at 10:11:25 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 03/08/2000 04:27:12 PM
> >[ On Tuesday, March 7, 2000 at 09:39:03 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
&
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 03/08/2000 04:27:12 PM
>[ On Tuesday, March 7, 2000 at 09:39:03 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
>> Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
>> What if the
>> final lines were "cvs add" instea
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 03/08/2000 03:18:04 PM
>> >Even still, what's wrong with an 'all-in-one' to add something to the module
>> >file as well? (or are you of the 'if it can be in a script, it mustn't be in
>> >the regular program' camp?)
>>
>> I know I'm in the 'if it can be in a script, it mu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 03/08/2000 04:23:10 PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
>[ On Tuesday, March 7, 2000 at 09:47:39 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote:
[ On Tuesday, March 7, 2000 at 09:39:03 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 03/06/2000 04:34:02 PM
> > Once again CVS admin directories will be created where necessary and th
[ On Tuesday, March 7, 2000 at 09:47:39 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
>
> No, Greg, you're confusing the term "operate on" with "version". Just 'cos CVS
> *operates o
[ On Tuesday, March 7, 2000 at 21:23:34 (-0600), Michael Gersten wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
>
> Even still, what's wrong with an 'all-in-one' to add something to the module
> file as well? (or are you
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 03/07/2000 10:23:34 PM
>"Greg A. Woods" wrote:
>> > Make sure that you don't permit 'cvs co mispelling' to create a new
>> > directory when 'cvs co misspelling' was intended.
>>
>> If you spell it right in the "CVSROOT/modules" entry then all should be
>> well... :-)
>>
>
"Greg A. Woods" wrote:
> > Make sure that you don't permit 'cvs co mispelling' to create a new
> > directory when 'cvs co misspelling' was intended.
>
> If you spell it right in the "CVSROOT/modules" entry then all should be
> well... :-)
>
> > How about 'cvs new module-name module-dir local-di
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 03/06/2000 05:59:45 PM
>[ On Monday, March 6, 2000 at 15:17:02 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
>> Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
>>
>> Although "cvs watch dir" won't actually watch &
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 03/06/2000 04:34:02 PM
>> Also, I just thought of a couple of cases that might need discussion:
>> Where, if anyplace, will CVS admin subdirectories get created?
>>
>> echo "dir" >.cvsignore
>> mkdir dir
>> cd dir
>> touch file
>> cvs add file
>
>"dir/CVS" will be created
[ On Monday, March 6, 2000 at 15:17:02 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
>
> Although "cvs watch dir" won't actually watch "dir", it does do
> something with (ie operate
[ On Monday, March 6, 2000 at 11:38:41 (-0600), Michael Gersten wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
>
> Make sure that you don't permit 'cvs co mispelling' to create a new
> directory when 'cvs co misspel
[ On Monday, March 6, 2000 at 09:37:33 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
>
> I think either CVS should require CVSROOT/modules or it shouldn't. Your
> proposal is an "in between" decisio
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 03/06/2000 12:33:39 PM
>On 6 Mar 2000, at 9:37, Noel L Yap wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2000.03.03 16:04:27
>> >[ On Friday, March 3, 2000 at 11:18:50 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
>> >> Subject: Re: removing the need for "
> >I did consider the possibility of allowing "cvs co new-dir" to just
> >create a new directory regardless of whether there's a modules entry
> >with the name "new-dir" yet or not. However I do feel rather strongly
> >that the use of the modules feature should be encouraged as much as
> >possibl
On 6 Mar 2000, at 9:37, Noel L Yap wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2000.03.03 16:04:27
> >[ On Friday, March 3, 2000 at 11:18:50 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
> >> Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
> >>[SNIP]
> >
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2000.03.03 16:04:27
>[ On Friday, March 3, 2000 at 11:18:50 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
>> Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
>>
>> Please help me out here. I'm trying to figure out where our
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2000.03.03 15:52:50
>[ On Friday, March 3, 2000 at 09:19:44 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
>> Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
>>
>>
>> OK, then, why do you say it's essential. Also, my p
[ On Friday, March 3, 2000 at 11:18:50 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
>
> Please help me out here. I'm trying to figure out where our disconnect is.
>
> I'm saying that "cvs w
[ On Friday, March 3, 2000 at 09:19:44 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
>
>
> OK, then, why do you say it's essential. Also, my poll says otherwise. Noone
> has responded to my poll saying
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 03/03/2000 12:10:11 AM
>[ On Thursday, March 2, 2000 at 11:37:10 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
>> Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
>>
>> > You are failing to
>> >understand the temporal
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 03/02/2000 05:03:06 PM
>[ On Thursday, March 2, 2000 at 09:51:25 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
>> Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 03/01/2000 09:45:14 PM
>> >
>
[ On Thursday, March 2, 2000 at 11:37:10 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
>
> > You are failing to
> >understand the temporal nature of CVS (its most central reason for
> >being!). This c
[ On Thursday, March 2, 2000 at 09:51:25 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 03/01/2000 09:45:14 PM
> >
> >NO, it must *NOT*! There is a very very essential optim
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 03/01/2000 09:43:02 PM
>[ On Wednesday, March 1, 2000 at 09:50:06 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
>> Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
>>
>> Yes, I know. However, they are created and acted upon by
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 03/01/2000 09:45:14 PM
>[ On Wednesday, March 1, 2000 at 10:25:26 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
>> Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
>>
>>
>> The "cvs add empty-hier" must create CVS
[ On Wednesday, March 1, 2000 at 10:25:26 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
>
>
> The "cvs add empty-hier" must create CVS admin subdirectories. The following
> "cvs ci" should
[ On Wednesday, March 1, 2000 at 09:50:06 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
>
> Yes, I know. However, they are created and acted upon by CVS. Our differences
> lie in what conditions they should be cr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 02/29/2000 01:08:54 PM
>[ On Tuesday, February 29, 2000 at 09:00:01 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
>> Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
>>
>> In order for "cvs add empty-hier; cvs ci" to w
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 02/29/2000 12:38:16 PM
>[ On Tuesday, February 29, 2000 at 08:34:25 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
>> Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
>>
>> You're absolutely correct again. If someone has a
[ On Tuesday, February 29, 2000 at 09:00:01 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
>
> In order for "cvs add empty-hier; cvs ci" to work properly, "cvs ci" will have
> to be changed to c
[ On Tuesday, February 29, 2000 at 08:34:25 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 02/28/2000 10:01:35 PM
> > Hmm... really? Are you really sure you know what kinds of
>
[ On Tuesday, February 29, 2000 at 08:34:25 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
>
> You're absolutely correct again. If someone has a .cvsignore file listing all
> their empty directories and do
Noel L Yap
02/29/2000 08:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
(Document link not converted)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 02/28/2000 10:01:35 PM
>>[ On Monday, February 28, 2000 at 16:57:30 (-0500),
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 02/28/2000 10:01:35 PM
>[ On Monday, February 28, 2000 at 16:57:30 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
>> Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
>>
>> Again, you're absolutely right. Users shouldn'
[ On Monday, February 28, 2000 at 16:57:30 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
>
> Again, you're absolutely right. Users shouldn't rely on the optimisation you
> propose. They should instead
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 02/28/2000 02:32:11 PM
>[ On Monday, February 28, 2000 at 09:21:42 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
>> Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
>>
>> I wasn't asking for a vote. I was asking for a poll
[ On Monday, February 28, 2000 at 09:21:42 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
>
> I wasn't asking for a vote. I was asking for a poll to gauge how my opinion
> compares with that of the populous.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 02/26/2000 02:23:11 PM
>[ On Friday, February 25, 2000 at 20:28:11 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
>> Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
>>
>> I want to take a poll with regards to the following issue:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2000.02.26 13:51:39
>[ On Friday, February 25, 2000 at 20:17:17 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
>> Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
>
>I'm not going to respond to any more of your crap. If you want t
After re-reading the question and my answer, I realized I answered the wrong
quesion. However, my argument holds even if the "common" tree is completely
empty of source files (e.g. right after a project is created). After doing a
checkout, if the CVS admin directories are not created then adds s
>--- Forwarded mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>I want to take a poll with regards to the following issue:
>"cvs add" must specially handle empty directory hierarchies such that no CVS
>admin subdirectories are created within them. (I've tried to be as unbiased
>with this statement as I can).
>Ple
[ On Friday, February 25, 2000 at 20:28:11 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
>
> I want to take a poll with regards to the following issue:
>
> "cvs add" must specially handle empty dir
[ On Friday, February 25, 2000 at 20:17:17 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
I'm not going to respond to any more of your crap. If you want to have
a sane academic debate about some of the finer deta
> From: Noel L Yap [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, February 25, 2000 5:28 PM
> "cvs add" must specially handle empty directory hierarchies
> such that no CVS
> admin subdirectories are created within them.
neutral.
The real issue with me is that, due to the fact that they are not v
I want to take a poll with regards to the following issue:
"cvs add" must specially handle empty directory hierarchies such that no CVS
admin subdirectories are created within them. (I've tried to be as unbiased
with this statement as I can).
Please answer with "strongly disagree", "disagree",
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2000.02.25 18:16:18
>[ On Thursday, February 24, 2000 at 20:50:24 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
>> Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2000.02.24 17:17:25
>> >[ On
[ On Thursday, February 24, 2000 at 20:50:24 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2000.02.24 17:17:25
> >[ On Thursday, February 24, 2000 at 13:34:36 (-0500), Noel L Yap
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2000.02.24 17:17:25
>[ On Thursday, February 24, 2000 at 13:34:36 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
>> The manual doesn't mention ACL's
>> at all.
>
>Hmm I wonder what that could mean!
Are you implying that noone should use ACLs within the repository? I thought
CVS and
[ On Thursday, February 24, 2000 at 13:34:36 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
>
> Greg, we've gone through this several times.
More than that, I'm sure.
> The manual doesn't menti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2000.02.23 23:29:35
>[ On Monday, February 21, 2000 at 09:39:31 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
>> Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
>>
>> > Given the current design of CVS there can be *NO* rea
[ On Monday, February 21, 2000 at 09:39:31 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
>
> > Given the current design of CVS there can be *NO* reasonable argument
> > for creating empty directories in the
[ On Sunday, February 20, 2000 at 23:56:58 (-0500), Garry T. Williams wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
>
> Do I understand the proposal correctly? Should I be doing something to
> make sure that CVS ignores my test di
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2000.02.21 11:34:52
>Noel Yap wrote:
>
>> Beware of premature optimisation. We've already laid out a process that
>> relies
>> on empty directories being created in the repo. IOW, it's *necessary* to
>> allow
>> creation of empty directories for this process. It would b
Noel Yap wrote:
> Beware of premature optimisation. We've already laid out a process that
> relies
> on empty directories being created in the repo. IOW, it's *necessary* to
> allow
> creation of empty directories for this process. It would be a kludge to
> create
> a dummy file for this purpo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2000.02.20 21:38:59
>[ On Friday, February 18, 2000 at 16:52:48 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
>> Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
>>
>> What I'm getting at is that "cvs add dir" should
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2000.02.20 21:38:59
>[ On Friday, February 18, 2000 at 16:52:48 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
>> Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
>>
>> What I'm getting at is that "cvs add dir" should
At 09:38 PM 2/20/00, you wrote:
>[ On Friday, February 18, 2000 at 16:52:48 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
> > Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
> >
> > What I'm getting at is that "cvs add dir" should create
[ On Friday, February 18, 2000 at 16:52:48 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
>
> What I'm getting at is that "cvs add dir" should create CVS admin subdirectories
> whether or not
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 02/17/2000 11:12:14 PM
>[ On Thursday, February 17, 2000 at 17:42:28 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
>> Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
>>
>> This is fine by me. Again, note that the above doesn&#
[ On Thursday, February 17, 2000 at 17:42:28 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
>
> This is fine by me. Again, note that the above doesn't mention "cvs add
> empty-hier" at all.
I'
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 02/16/2000 06:04:11 PM
>[ On Wednesday, February 16, 2000 at 12:43:31 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
>> Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
>>
>> "cvs add dir" *must* operate on the local dire
[ On Wednesday, February 16, 2000 at 12:43:31 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
>
> "cvs add dir" *must* operate on the local directory in so far as to create CVS
> admin subdirectories wit
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 02/16/2000 12:50:51 AM
>My proposal was an RFC of sorts -- eventually it will come with "working
>code" to prove the concept (just as the original release of CVS offered
>a way to prove the validity of the copy-modify-merge paradigm). The
>final pudding will be in how wid
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 02/15/2000 02:19:56 PM
>The *standard* meaning of "cvs SOMECOMMAND dir" is to operate on the
>files within "dir" (including recursing into any sub-directories and
>operating on the files within them too unless you use '-l', sans the
>optimisation I discuss in the final par
[ On Tuesday, February 15, 2000 at 14:51:27 (-0500), John Macdonald wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
>
> CVS manages directories;
No, it does not.
> it does not just deal with disorganized
> files.
Well, actua
[ On Tuesday, February 15, 2000 at 11:38:33 (-0800), Jerry Nairn wrote: ]
> Subject: RE: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server....
>
> So, after you're done, I will have to create a directory in the repository
> so that cvs will accept a file in
Greg A. Woods wrote :
|| [ On Tuesday, February 15, 2000 at 10:00:51 (-0500), John Macdonald wrote: ]
|| > Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
|| >
|| > Hah. So when I "cvs co module" those directories module, module/foo,
||
Greg A. Woods wrote :
|| [ On Tuesday, February 15, 2000 at 09:18:18 (-0500), John Macdonald wrote: ]
|| > Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
|| >
|| > Oh? When is the last time that you had to create a directory in the
|| > repos
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2000 9:19 AM
> [ On Tuesday, February 15, 2000 at 09:18:18 (-0500), John
> Macdonald wrote: ]
> > Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to
> contact the server
>
[ On Monday, February 14, 2000 at 12:23:12 (-0500), John Macdonald wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
>
> When a user creates a new file on the file system he first does a
> mkdir and then edits the file. How does it
[ On Tuesday, February 15, 2000 at 10:00:51 (-0500), John Macdonald wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
>
> Hah. So when I "cvs co module" those directories module, module/foo,
> and module/bar just spring into ex
[ On Tuesday, February 15, 2000 at 09:18:18 (-0500), John Macdonald wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
>
> Oh? When is the last time that you had to create a directory in the
> repository so that it would accept a file
Noel Yap wrote:
[...]
> Taking another stance, "cvs add dir" will still act on files within dir.
> The
> difference with my proposition is that "dir/CVS" will be created whether
> or not
> there're files within the hierarchy. And, "dir" will get created upon
> "cvs ci"
> whether or not
Greg A. Woods wrote :
|| [ On Monday, February 14, 2000 at 12:55:06 (-0500), John Macdonald wrote: ]
|| > Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
|| >
|| > If CVS checkout only returned a collection of files which the user
|| > had to p
Mike Little wrote :
|| On 14 Feb 00, at 12:23, John Macdonald wrote:
|| >... and they all ignore all of the files and sub-directories of any
|| >directory that doesn't contain a CVS sub-dir (i.e. any directory that
|| >is not part of the cvs-managed work area is totally ignored). They
|| >quietly
Greg A. Woods wrote :
|| [ On Monday, February 14, 2000 at 10:32:58 (-0500), John Macdonald wrote: ]
|| > Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
|| >
|| > RCS manges only files and not directories.
||
|| Indeed.
||
|| > CVS manages dire
[ On Monday, February 14, 2000 at 12:55:06 (-0500), John Macdonald wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
>
> If CVS checkout only returned a collection of files which the user
> had to put back into the right directory hie
[ On Monday, February 14, 2000 at 16:01:09 (-0800), Jerry Nairn wrote: ]
> Subject: RE: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server....
>
> In any case, your proposal is not the ideas that Andrew expressed "fleshed
> out." You're adding u
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, February 11, 2000 10:12 PM
> [ On Friday, February 11, 2000 at 14:48:09 (-0800), Jerry
> Nairn wrote: ]
> > Subject: RE: removing the need for "cvs add file" to
> contact the server...
On 14 Feb 00, at 12:23, John Macdonald wrote:
>... and they all ignore all of the files and sub-directories of any
>directory that doesn't contain a CVS sub-dir (i.e. any directory that
>is not part of the cvs-managed work area is totally ignored). They
>quietly return from such a directory witho
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, February 11, 2000 10:07 PM
> arguing. I give up. If you don't like my version of "cvs add" then
> don't use it. Happy CVSing.
Whether I like it or not was not an object of contention.
You want "cvs add" to work in a way that
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, February 11, 2000 10:02 PM
> Then the history again:
> Andrew Nicholson proposed a very simple scheme that allows
> 'cvs add' to
> just do its thing in the same way *ALL* other CVS commands do
> so that it
> doesn't have to r
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 02/12/2000 01:02:01 AM
>[ On Friday, February 11, 2000 at 17:38:59 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
>> Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
>>
>> This has absolutely nothing to do with the original question
[ On Monday, February 14, 2000 at 10:32:58 (-0500), John Macdonald wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
>
> RCS manges only files and not directories.
Indeed.
> CVS manages directory trees containing files. While t
Tobias Weingartner wrote :
|| On Monday, February 14, John Macdonald wrote:
|| > || Because CVS manages only files, not directories. Directories control
|| > || where CVS does its work, but that's it. CVS doesn't operate on
|| > || directories, but rather within them.
|| > ||
|| > || CVS is a f
Greg A. Woods wrote :
|| [ On Friday, February 11, 2000 at 17:38:59 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
|| > Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
|| >
|| > This has absolutely nothing to do with the original question, "How has/will
|| > a
On Monday, February 14, John Macdonald wrote:
> || Because CVS manages only files, not directories. Directories control
> || where CVS does its work, but that's it. CVS doesn't operate on
> || directories, but rather within them.
> ||
> || CVS is a front-end to RCS (though these days it's stric
Greg A. Woods wrote :
|| [ On Friday, February 11, 2000 at 11:44:38 (-0500), John Macdonald wrote: ]
|| > Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
|| >
|| > Using "cvs add dir" to push the envelope of the cvs-managed area is a
||
91 matches
Mail list logo
