Hello,
I am a beginner with reserved checkout. I found several helpentries on
the cvshome page and want test a method using the rcslock file. I added
a line in the commitinfo file like the follow:
ALL /usr/lib/cvs/contrib/rcslock
If user A locks and edit a file out of the repository
Hi,
I want to use CVS in a reserved checkout model with centralised access
to repository. It's to say :
- reserved checkout : developpers need to lock files before act ;
- centralised access : developpers only have read acces to repository.
They need to send their modified files
communication. There
are patches available at SourceForge under project
RCVS that'll extend the "cvs edit" command to help
with communication. Take a look at them.
Noel
--- Matthias Kienle
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am a beginner with reserved checkout. I
[ On Thursday, January 31, 2002 at 10:34:52 (+0100), Matthias Kienle wrote: ]
> Subject: reserved checkout
>
> What do I wrong?
Don't use reserved checkouts with CVS -- CVS is the "Concurrent Versions System"!
--
> [ On Thursday, January 31, 2002 at 10:34:52 (+0100), Matthias Kienle
> wrote: ]
> > Subject: reserved checkout
> >
> > What do I wrong?
>
> Don't use reserved checkouts with CVS -- CVS is the "Concurrent Versions
> System"!
>
I know cvs is
thers.
4. Developers proceed only if there's no danger of
future merges.
Note that this won't alleviate the problem of
concurrent development through branches.
Noel
--- Matthias Kienle
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [ On Thursday, January 31, 2002 at 10:34:52
> (+0100), Matthia
[ On Friday, February 1, 2002 at 09:03:55 (+0100), Matthias Kienle wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: reserved checkout
>
> I am a linuxer and I would hate it to explain my manager that cvs does not
> support reserved checkouts for binary files. I control all web pages, server
> configu
Matthias Kienle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 12:04 AM
> To: Greg A. Woods
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: reserved checkout
>
>
> > [ On Thursday, January 31, 2002 at 10:34:52 (+0100), Matthias Kienle
> > wrote: ]
> > >
~ President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, November 23,
> 1933 in a letter to
> Colonel Edward Mandell House
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Matthias Kienle
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 12:04 AM
> > To: Greg A. Woods
[ On Friday, February 1, 2002 at 11:10:30 (-0800), EXT-Corcoran, David wrote: ]
> Subject: RE: reserved checkout
>
> pardon my abject ignorance on all of this...
>
> But could you use uuencode and uudecode? The deltas may be *HUGE* but it
> might be worth a lookit.
Not only w
nt through branches.
>
> Noel
> --- Matthias Kienle
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > [ On Thursday, January 31, 2002 at 10:34:52
> > (+0100), Matthias Kienle
> > > wrote: ]
> > > > Subject: reserved checkout
> > > >
> > > >
concurrent development through branches.
> >
> > Noel
> > --- Matthias Kienle
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > [ On Thursday, January 31, 2002 at 10:34:52
> > > (+0100), Matthias Kienle
> > > > wrote: ]
> > > > > Subject: re
On Friday, August 4, Guilhem BONNEFILLE wrote:
>
> I want to use CVS in a reserved checkout model with centralised access
> to repository. It's to say :
> - reserved checkout : developpers need to lock files before act ;
> - centralised access : developpers only have read
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Noel L Yap)
Subject: Reserved checkout
Hi,
I want to use CVS in a reserved checkout model with centralised access
to repository. It's to say :
- reserved checkout : developpers need to lock files before act ;
- centralised access : developpers only have
Guilhem BONNEFILLE wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I want to use CVS in a reserved checkout model with centralised access
> to repository. It's to say :
> - reserved checkout : developpers need to lock files before act ;
The best you're going to do is cvs watch and cvs edit,
[ On Friday, August 4, 2000 at 18:10:20 (+0200), Guilhem BONNEFILLE wrote: ]
> Subject: Reserved checkout
>
> - Is there a configuration tool which have a such model ?
> - Url for more information ???
Since there are many ways to implement "centralised access", there can
Folks,
I am new to CVS.
CVS gives the option of "reserved checkouts".
www.wincvs.org offers a GUI where we have the option of
1.reserved edit
2.forced edit
But the problem is even it is reserved edit/forced edit
then the other person logs in alters the readonly file
at the client and then commit
Hello all,
Has anyone setup reserved checkout in CVS (ver 1.11.1p1) in Unix
(Solaris)? Or is there any documentation on this other than the manual
that comes with the source code?
If there is any info., please email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Many thanks in advance
Andrew
Arun Sundar writes:
>
> Is this really possible in CVS. If I edit a file, UNTIL
> I COMMIT it no one should be able to commit that file.
CVS is the *Concurrent* Versions System. If that's not what you want,
you're using the wrong tool.
-Larry Jones
Everybody's a slave to routine. -- Calvin
yone could 'miss' it.
Perhaps I'm just too intolerant.
Mark Cooper
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Larry Jones)
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
28/02/2003 15:33
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Arun Sundar)
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: Rea
> It leads me to wonder if there is something missing in the documentation
> or the tool description from the (various) web site(s) that is somehow
> preventing people from understanding what cvs is all about, although I
> can't for the life of me see how anyone could 'miss' it.
I wrote this fo
w anyone could 'miss' it.
>
> Perhaps I'm just too intolerant.
>
> Mark Cooper
>
>
>
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Larry Jones)
> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 28/02/2003 15:33
>
>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Arun Sundar)
>
Donald Sharp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The cvs documentation is obtuse and hard to read.
It might be more useful to say that the documentation is designed as a
reference - it will tell you everything there is to know about one
aspect of CVS, then progress to another. This is useful if you
al
On Friday 28 February 2003 12:55 pm, Brandon Craig Rhodes wrote:
> Donald Sharp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The cvs documentation is obtuse and hard to read.
>
> It might be more useful to say that the documentation is designed as a
> reference - it will tell you everything there is to know abo
Ross Patterson writes:
>
> But, for example, CVS's peculiar vulnerability to NFS
> errors isn't touched on at all, despite it being a critical issue.
That's a good point, although CVS isn't alone -- I first ran encountered
the problem in relation to my company's CAD/CAM/CAE software, which is
ho
How does one use the reserved locks?
Jerzy Kaczorowski wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Paul Sander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > There's Noel Yap's patches on SourceForge, which apply to a down-rev
> release
> > of CVS. I believe that others have implemented it as well, but only
> p
I sent out instructions within the several threads about this. I guess you
missed it 'cos you were too busy ranting. Please check the archives.
Noel
How does one use the reserved locks?
Jerzy Kaczorowski wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Paul Sander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > T
David Masterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >>>>> Andrew writes:
>
> > Has anyone setup reserved checkout in CVS (ver 1.11.1p1) in Unix
> > (Solaris)? Or is there any documentation on this other than t
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Greg Cooper wrote:
>David Masterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>> >>>>> Andrew writes:
>>
>> > Has anyone setup reserved checkout in CVS (ver 1.11.1p1) in Unix
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kaz Kylheku) wrote:
>Tell the manager to shed his or her superstitions, and work with
>the facts. The facts are:
>
>- Concurrent development works just fine.
>- Your team already likes it.
>- Strict locking does not prevent concurrency, it only reduces
> it to a coarse granula
;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >> >>>>> Andrew writes:
> >>
> >> > Has anyone setup reserved checkout in CVS (ver 1.11.1p1) in Unix
> >> > (Solaris)? Or is there any documentation on this other than the
> >> > manual that comes with the sou
MAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >>>>> Andrew writes:
>
> > Has anyone setup reserved checkout in CVS (ver 1.11.1p1) in Unix
> > (Solaris)? Or is there any documentation on this other than the
> > manual that comes with the source code?
>
> Given the CVS model of unreserved c
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kaz Kylheku) wrote:
>
>>Tell the manager to shed his or her superstitions, and work with
>>the facts. The facts are:
>>
>>- Concurrent development works just fine.
>>- Your team already likes it.
>>- Strict locking does not prevent concurrency, it only reduces
>> it to a co
> Kaz Kylheku writes:
[...with respect to CVS...]
> Tell the manager to shed his or her superstitions, and work with the
> facts. The facts are:
> - Concurrent development works just fine.
> - Your team already likes it.
> - Strict locking does not prevent concurrency, it only reduces
> i
A huge portion of Streamed Lines deals with branches. Now, consider that
unreserved checkouts are sort of like (if not exactly) virtual branches...
IOW, if the manager is _really_ against concurrent development, then he/she
should be against any version control tool that allows branches as well
On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 01:18:55AM -0700, Andrew wrote:
> Has anyone setup reserved checkout in CVS (ver 1.11.1p1) in Unix
> (Solaris)? Or is there any documentation on this other than the manual
> that comes with the source code?
Try http://cvsbook.red-bean.com/ for a very good book
other parties to
minimize the chances of conflicts.
3. If the chances of conflicts is minimal or the others cannot be
contacted, "cvs edit -f" the files.
4. If one receives notification about an as-yet-unknown edit, contact the
editor to help minimize the chances of conflicts.
Noel
Hello all
>>>>> Andrew writes:
> Has anyone setup reserved checkout in CVS (ver 1.11.1p1) in Unix
> (Solaris)? Or is there any documentation on this other than the
> manual that comes with the source code?
Given the CVS model of unreserved checkouts, why do you need reserved
c
t; minimize the chances of conflicts.
> 3. If the chances of conflicts is minimal or the others cannot be
> contacted, "cvs edit -f" the files.
> 4. If one receives notification about an as-yet-unknown edit, contact the
> editor to help minimize the chances of conflicts.
>
>
contacted, "cvs edit -f" the files.
> 4. If one receives notification about an as-yet-unknown edit, contact the
> editor to help minimize the chances of conflicts.
>
> Noel
>
> Hello all,
>
> Has anyone setup reserved checkout in CVS (ver 1.11.1p1) in Unix
> (Solar
If your question really is: "Is anyone modifying CVS to support locking?"
Then I believe the answer is "yes".
If your question really is: "Is anyone making locking a mainstream feature
of CVS?" Then I believe the answer is "no".
Despite the outcry to have this capability, no one with commit a
.
> 4. If one receives notification about an as-yet-unknown edit, contact the
> editor to help minimize the chances of conflicts.
>
> Noel
>
> Hello all,
>
> Has anyone setup reserved checkout in CVS (ver 1.11.1p1) in Unix
> (Solaris)? Or is there any documentatio
Paul Sander wrote:
> If your question really is: "Is anyone modifying CVS to support locking?"
> Then I believe the answer is "yes".
Who? And where may I get it?
>
> If your question really is: "Is anyone making locking a mainstream feature
> of CVS?" Then I believe the answer is "no".
sha
> 2. If the files are being edited by others, contact the other parties to
> > minimize the chances of conflicts.
> > 3. If the chances of conflicts is minimal or the others cannot be
> > contacted, "cvs edit -f" the files.
> > 4. If one receives notification about
>> If your question really is: "Is anyone making locking a mainstream
feature
>> of CVS?" Then I believe the answer is "no".
>
>shame
I think getting real reserved locks into CVS is impossible without
chainging CVS so much as to make it not CVS anymore. Of course, you're
welcome to try.
Noe
[ On Friday, October 12, 2001 at 02:17:41 (GMT), Bryon Lape wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: CVS - setup reserved checkout
>
> Paul Sander wrote:
>
> > If your question really is: "Is anyone making locking a mainstream feature
> > of CVS?" Then I believe the answer is
There's Noel Yap's patches on SourceForge, which apply to a down-rev release
of CVS. I believe that others have implemented it as well, but only privately
in their own shops. Maybe they don't advertise them for fear of being blasted
by Greg.
--- Forwarded mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Paul Sande
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 11/10/2001 at 23:03 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>Read Berliner's whole paper. Understand what it means to "force"
>developers to use a "parallel" development paradigm and learn what the
>benefits are.
I understand it, there aren't any.
---
Wo? Ich kann nicht es gefunden.
Paul Sander wrote:
> There's Noel Yap's patches on SourceForge, which apply to a down-rev release
> of CVS. I believe that others have implemented it as well, but only privately
> in their own shops. Maybe they don't advertise them for fear of being blasted
> b
"Greg A. Woods" wrote:
> Read Berliner's whole paper. Understand what it means to "force"
> developers to use a "parallel" development paradigm and learn what the
> benefits are.
The benefits add up to zero. Now, if it did method locking, that would be helpful,
protective AND productive. With
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bryon Lape wrote:
>"Greg A. Woods" wrote:
>
>> Read Berliner's whole paper. Understand what it means to "force"
>> developers to use a "parallel" development paradigm and learn what the
>> benefits are.
>
>The benefits add up to zero. Now, if it did method locking
Ich funde es bei
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=422733&group_id=4680&atid=304680
>--- Forwarded mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Wo? Ich kann nicht es gefunden.
>Paul Sander wrote:
>> There's Noel Yap's patches on SourceForge, which apply to a down-rev release
>> of CVS
Kaz Kylheku wrote:
> CVS doesn't require hand merging. When you perform a cvs update
> operation, then new changes in the repository are automatically
> incorporated into your working copy. Only when a conflict arises do
> you have to do resolution by hand. Conflicts tend to occur rarely, and
>
Netscape tries and tries, but nothing is ever returned by this link.
Paul Sander wrote:
Ich funde es bei http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=422733&group_id=4680&atid=304680
>--- Forwarded mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Wo? Ich kann nicht es gefunden.
>Paul Sander wrote:
>> Th
It sounds like the software your group is maintaining needs factoring to
decrease the likelihood that several developers are modifying the same
method. It also sounds like your group can use some communication.
Noel
"Greg A. Woods" wrote:
> Read Berliner's whole paper. Understand what it mea
--- Bryon Lape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kaz Kylheku wrote:
>
> > CVS doesn't require hand merging. When you perform a cvs update
> > operation, then new changes in the repository are automatically
> > incorporated into your working copy. Only when a conflict arises do
> > you have to do res
If you've really made up your mind then don't use CVS. But think about
this first: Why are you the only group I know who has tried parallel
development and didn't like it?
Noel
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 11/10/2001 at 23:03 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>Read Berliner's whole
>> Conflicts are extremely easy to produce and may not be easily resolved.
>
>The issue it seems you are having is that on a regular basis, two or more
>developers making large abouts of unrelated changes to same sections of
code.
>This problem cannot be solved by locking checkouts, or by any ch
You need to ask yourself why your group is experiencing so many conflicts
while so many other groups (thousands?) are not.
Noel
Kaz Kylheku wrote:
> CVS doesn't require hand merging. When you perform a cvs update
> operation, then new changes in the repository are automatically
> incorporated
I was able to use Netscape get to the patches. Exactly what are you doing?
Noel
Netscape tries and tries, but nothing is ever returned by this link.
Paul Sander wrote:
Ich funde es bei
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=422733&group_id=4680&atid=304680
Your reply, as written, contradicts itself.
___
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
Conflicts are easy to produce *when you have multiple developers working on
the same segments of code*.
If you are doing a lot of that without any coordination between the
developers, you are going to have a lot of problems. Period.
___
Info-cvs mai
> -Original Message-
> From: Bryon Lape [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> The benefits add up to zero. Now, if it did method locking,
> that would be helpful,
> protective AND productive. Without some sort of locking,
> having developers waste
> time with doing merging by hand is count
[ On Friday, October 12, 2001 at 00:06:34 (-0400), Bryon Lape wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: CVS - setup reserved checkout
>
> *** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
>
> On 11/10/2001 at 23:03 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >
> >Read Berliner's whole paper.
[ On Friday, October 12, 2001 at 04:05:42 (GMT), Bryon Lape wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: CVS - setup reserved checkout
>
> The benefits add up to zero. Now, if it did method locking, that would be helpful,
> protective AND productive. Without some sort of locking, having developers waste
[ On Friday, October 12, 2001 at 11:22:37 (GMT), Bryon Lape wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: CVS - setup reserved checkout
>
> Conflicts are extremely easy to produce and may not be easily resolved.
Hmmm. and how is this different from any other change control
process? In non-parallel
[ On Friday, October 12, 2001 at 09:35:58 (-0500), Thornley, David wrote: ]
> Subject: RE: CVS - setup reserved checkout
>
>
> What do you mean by "method locking"? Locking individual parts
> of a file? It wouldn't do you any good.
Well, not with CVS anywa
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Greg A. Woods
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2001 9:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: CVS-II Discussion Mailing List
Subject: Re: CVS - setup reserved checkout
[ On Friday, October 12, 2001 at 00:06:34 (-0400), Bryon Lape wrote: ]
>
[ On Friday, October 12, 2001 at 09:51:54 (-0700), Gianni Mariani wrote: ]
> Subject: RE: CVS - setup reserved checkout
>
> There is a case where Greg would agree with you and that's in the case of
> binary files or files that can't be merged automagically - like jpegs or
&
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Greg A. Woods wrote:
>Even locking without lock contention won't solve all conflict
>scenarios. Commit wars are possible with any change control process.
Even if you lock an entire repository, you can still get conflicts;
conflicts outside of the system.
Suppose
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bryon Lape wrote:
>Kaz Kylheku wrote:
>
>> CVS doesn't require hand merging. When you perform a cvs update
>> operation, then new changes in the repository are automatically
>> incorporated into your working copy. Only when a conflict arises do
>> you have to do re
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, October 12, 2001 11:46 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: CVS - setup reserved checkout
>
>
> [ On Friday, October 12, 2001 at 09:35:58 (-0500), Thornley,
> Dav
I got there by going to http://sourceforge.net/ and typing "rcvs" in the
search field. That produced a table of about a dozen patches, one of
which had a suitable one-description. I clicked on that, then on the
"download" button.
>--- Forwarded mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Netscape tries and t
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>You need to ask yourself why your group is experiencing so many conflicts
>while so many other groups (thousands?) are not.
Because there is no group, and there are no conflicts. This is just
another Chicken Little yelling that the sky
One would hope that one's shop is not using the same branch for both
maintenance and new features. That kind of thing is best done on
separate branches (where the two schedules don't interfere with each
other). The bug fix is later merged into the new development when
it's appropriate to do so.
>--- Forwarded mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[ On Friday, October 12, 2001 at 04:05:42 (GMT), Bryon Lape wrote: ]
>> Subject: Re: CVS - setup reserved checkout
>>
>> The benefits add up to zero. Now, if it did method locking, that would be helpful,
>> protective
>--- Forwarded mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>3 developers (A,B,C) need to fix file X.
>A is making some major changes, adding lots of new functionality.
>B and C need to make a minor tweak to the file.
>In a CVS model:
>B anc C can be done and outa there in minutes and essentially forget about
>
TED]
>[ On Friday, October 12, 2001 at 09:35:58 (-0500), Thornley, David wrote: ]
>> Subject: RE: CVS - setup reserved checkout
>>
>>
>> What do you mean by "method locking"? Locking individual parts
>> of a file? It wouldn't do you any good.
>W
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, October 12, 2001 1:34 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: CVS - setup reserved checkout
>
>
> One would hope that one's shop is not u
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Paul Sander wrote:
>Under those conditions, almost any version control tool provides the
>necessary merge tool.
Your inexperience is showing. There are version control tools in *broad*
use that have extremely support for branching and merging.
Exhibit A: Visual Sou
[ On Friday, October 12, 2001 at 15:45:15 (-0500), Thornley, David wrote: ]
> Subject: RE: CVS - setup reserved checkout
>
> The last job I had not involving the use of CVS was with SCCS,
> and we didn't have branches. This did make shipping bug-fixed
> stuff to customers int
Wrong.
Kaz Kylheku wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >You need to ask yourself why your group is experiencing so many conflicts
> >while so many other groups (thousands?) are not.
>
> Because there is no group, and there are no conflicts. This is just
> a
I simply clicked on the link you supplied. I even copied it to IE
just to make sure Nutscraper wasn't having a problem.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was able to use Netscape get to the patches.
Exactly what are you doing?
Noel
Netscape tries and tries, but nothing is ever returned by this link.
P
Because there is no group, and there are no conflicts. This is just
another Chicken Little yelling that the sky is falling. Actually
a step beneath Chicken Little, because something actually did fall on
Chicken Little's head, it wasn't just pure imagination. :)
Yes, I was giving him the benefi
>In the end, productivity is probably the same in either method.
Developers
>spend a lot of time getting coffee every day while their automatic merges
>complete, or they slave away for hours resolving conflicts once every
couple
>of weeks. But perception is everything here; letting the automati
2, 2001 at 09:35:58 (-0500), Thornley, David wrote:
]
>> Subject: RE: CVS - setup reserved checkout
>>
>>
>> What do you mean by "method locking"? Locking individual parts
>> of a file? It wouldn't do you any good.
>Well, not with CVS anyway! :-)
OK, then exactly what are you expecting from the link? Maybe SourceForge
was down when you tried it? Have you tried it again? Have you tried
following the step-by-step instructions I sent out?
Noel
I simply clicked on the link you supplied. I even copied it to IE just to
make sure Nutscrape
> -Original Message-
> From: Bryon Lape [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> Wrong.
>
> Kaz Kylheku wrote:
>
> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >
> > >You need to ask yourself why your group is experiencing so
> many conflicts
> > >while so many other grou
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Sander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> There's Noel Yap's patches on SourceForge, which apply to a down-rev
release
> of CVS. I believe that others have implemented it as well, but only
privately
> in their own shops. Maybe they don't advertise them for fear of b
ted by
CVS. And to see if those advantages are really appropriate for the closed
development projects.
I
have worked in closed environments for a long time using reserved checkout
systems such as MKS, PVCS, and SourceSafe. In this environment, where many
people may be working on the same se
Hello,
I want to use the strict reserved checkout for a module. I see that it can
be done by
Using the "cvs admin -l" command with "rev" indication. I don't want to lock
only a revision,
I want to lock an entire module.
So how can I specify that I want to have sin
:)
On Fri, 31 Mar 2000, Bill Lee wrote:
> I have worked in closed environments for a long time using reserved checkout
> systems such as MKS, PVCS, and SourceSafe.
Ditto, although my experience is only with CVS and (shudder) SS.
> In this environment, where many
> people may be worki
>--- Forwarded mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>On Fri, 31 Mar 2000, Bill Lee wrote:
>> I have worked in closed environments for a long time using reserved checkout
>> systems such as MKS, PVCS, and SourceSafe.
>Ditto, although my experience is only with CVS and (shu
and "cvs edit -f" should
work).
Noel
Enc
(See attached file: edit-c.diff)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2000.03.31 19:23:29
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Noel L Yap)
Subject: Reserved vs. non-reserved checkout
I'm sure that this topic has been covered here before, so if someone wa
You are using an invalid email address:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] which is resolving to someone who does not
wish to get this mail. Please take this address out of your mailing
lists.
Regards, Ruth Ann Hill TI Central Help Desk , Team
Lead
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 972-575-4071 or pgr
Hi there,
CVS server version:1.11.2 on HP-UX 11i
CVS client: Win CVS 1.3.8.1 on Win2K
How to set CVS be the reserved checkout mode only? I mean that if one
checkout a file and edit it, before he/she commit it, other can't edit the
file.
Now, we use the rcslock.pl file according to the
--- "LIU,SHI-ZHOU (HP-China,ex2)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> CVS server version:1.11.2 on HP-UX 11i
> CVS client: Win CVS 1.3.8.1 on Win2K
I'd upgrade the client to be able to take advantage of
some newer commands (eg "cvs edit").
> How to set CVS be th
"LIU,SHI-ZHOU (HP-China,ex2)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> Hi there,
>
> CVS server version:1.11.2 on HP-UX 11i
> CVS client: Win CVS 1.3.8.1 on Win2K
>
> How to set CVS be the reserved checkout mode only? I mean t
98 matches
Mail list logo
