Re: Cyrus IMAP 2.0.13 released

2001-04-27 Thread Michael Fair
God I love these guys! Thanks Larry! Being part of the Cyrus crowd is great. I was just thinking about the fact that I hadn't seen any announcements about 2.0.13 just yesterday and was wondering if the coding was still coming along. -- Michael -- - Original Message - From: Lawrence

Re: Patch to change dots to slashes.

2001-04-27 Thread Chris Dunlop
This is a modification of my earlier patch to enable changing the mailbox delimiter to a different character (eg. a slash), which was based almost entirely on David Fuchs' original patch to change the delimiter to a slash. This patch fixes a problem with both earlier patches which broke setting

deliver bus error core dump

2001-04-27 Thread nicolas . bonnand
Hello, I'm running Cyrus IMAP4 v1.6.24 for several months under solaris and since yesterday deliver -E 2 doesn't work any more /usr/local/imap/imapd/bin/deliver -E 2 Bus Error - core dumped I've tried to analyse why and made a truss of /usr/local/imap/imapd/bin/deliver -E 2 I've got this:

Re: deliver bus error core dump

2001-04-27 Thread Richard Hopkins
I think you've hit the bug I mailed in on 19th April (Subject: deliver -E (Solaris, 1.6.24 without DB). In part it read... --- On Solaris platforms which don't have DB available, deliver -E fails to prune anything, ever. The problem starts in deliver.c, in the _prune_actual_db routine. In

Re: Cyrus IMAP 2.0.13 released

2001-04-27 Thread Helmut Apfelholz
Hi, this is greate that the development of the server is moving along. I hope that you guys at cmu also watch to mailing list, and have seen the 'forking problem' that ppl here have been describing. We will try to test the newest release and will report ASAP if the problem persists or not. Thank

Re: deliver bus error core dump

2001-04-27 Thread nicolas . bonnand
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think you've hit the bug I mailed in on 19th April (Subject: deliver -E (Solaris, 1.6.24 without DB). In part it read... Thanks for your answer. You're right, it seems to be the same bug Does anyone know how to correct this ? Is it corrected under 2.0.12 ?

Re: Cyrus IMAP 2.0.13 released

2001-04-27 Thread Amos Gouaux
I was wondering if perhaps the maxchild parameter was inspired, at least in part, to keep a check on processes like lmtpd from getting so numerous that the possibility of contention increases. Though, that's just a wild guess On Fri, 27 Apr 2001 03:55:41 -0700 (PDT), Helmut Apfelholz

Re: Virtual Domain Implementation (example)

2001-04-27 Thread John C. Amodeo
Marius, We use standard DNS, not DNS entries in LDAP or anything like that. I assume (I could be wrong - someone help me out...) that your LDAP directory structure would be completely independent of your DNS registrations. If you had 2 domains registered to your organization, you could have 2

RE: Virtual Domain Implementation (example)

2001-04-27 Thread Tegomoh, Marius N.
John, Thanks. It makes sense now. It was an issue of my limited understanding of LDAP and how its trees are designed. If I need further help on this I'll bother you privately since this is no longer a Cyrus issue. Thanks for your help. Marius -Original Message- From: John C.

Re: cyrus configuration

2001-04-27 Thread Larry M. Rosenbaum
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 08:48:01AM +0200, Werner Reisberger wrote: as in Debian/Linux. You need to use imap 143/tcp i have same problem: telnet localhost 143 Trying 127.0.0.1... Connected to localhost. Escape character is '^]'. Connection closed by foreign host. in syslog: Apr 24

Re: How to add virtual domain support

2001-04-27 Thread Todd Nemanich
Michael Fair wrote: Yes, the Cyrus server supports realms though it is largely unused. Currently SASL just fills the realm info in with the hostname of the machine. You can see this when you do sasldblistusers. In regards to all clients supportnig SASL. Perhaps it's only a matter of

Re: Cyrus IMAP 2.0.13 released

2001-04-27 Thread Larry M. Rosenbaum
I've placed Cyrus IMAP 2.0.13 on ftp.andrew. This version adds a couple of new features and some slight code reorganization. We'd love to have people try it out. I noticed that pop3d.c now has some APOP code. Does that mean there's a new version of Cyrus SASL containing the sasl_checkapop()

Re: Cyrus IMAP 2.0.13 released

2001-04-27 Thread rj45
this forking problem is related only in the case of Linux environment ? I have not noticed it on FreeBSD. thanks Rick On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Helmut Apfelholz wrote: Hi, this is greate that the development of the server is moving along. I hope that you guys at cmu also watch to mailing

Re: Cyrus IMAP 2.0.13 released

2001-04-27 Thread Ken Murchison
Larry M. Rosenbaum wrote: I've placed Cyrus IMAP 2.0.13 on ftp.andrew. This version adds a couple of new features and some slight code reorganization. We'd love to have people try it out. I noticed that pop3d.c now has some APOP code. Does that mean there's a new version of Cyrus

Re: Cyrus IMAP 2.0.13 released

2001-04-27 Thread Walter Wong
Helmut Apfelholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: this is greate that the development of the server is moving along. I hope that you guys at cmu also watch to mailing list, and have seen the 'forking problem' that ppl here have been describing. Yes, we read the mailing lists but have been busy

Re: Cyrus IMAP 2.0.13 released

2001-04-27 Thread Joel M. Baldwin
I've had a problem that might be in under FBSD 3.5stable. I haven't implemented Cyrus yet, but under load testing I see a large number of sendmail processes that are in a Client Greeting state. I presume that sendmail is trying to talk to lmtpd and not getting a response. I've gotten around