On Thu, 19 Jul 2001, Christopher Riordan spewed into the ether:
> One downfall is I run seperate domains same domain name different TLD. and
> they are ran by different people, without the TLD we would get conflicting
> emails.
The split code merely splits on the @
[EMAIL PROTECTED] will be split
On Fri, 20 Jul 2001, Michael Fair spewed into the ether:
> > It doesn't. Thats the point. Currently the disk structure enforces a
> > structure like user.username. I am changing this to domain.username
> > (Not a TLD, just the first part. So andrew.cmu.edu will require
> > user@andrew to login.)
>
On Fri, 20 Jul 2001, Ken Murchison spewed into the ether:
> I haven't needed virtual domain support, and so I haven't thought about
> it much, but my first reaction is that simply changing the 'user.'
> prefix to 'domain.' is either going to be insufficient or will become a
> hack.
Its a start.
On Fri, 20 Jul 2001, Joel M. Baldwin spewed into the ether:
> My resolution to this was to encode the username and domainname
> into the Cyrus username such that [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> turns into the Cyrus mailbox user.johnsmith__somedomaincom
> The disk storage turns into SPOOLROOT/user/somedomainco
Hi,
There is an interesting bug in the sasl -ldap patch that I am wondering if anyone has
mannaged to reproduce something like it. The bug shows up when I try to compile other
programes. I get the following errormessage in configure.log:
int main() {
int i
; return 0; }
configure:12395: gcc -
Matt,
This is most likely the problem of imapd and sasl being linked against
different libdb's
Can you provide the results of:
ldd /usr/cyrus/bin/imapd
ldd /usr/cyrus/bin/master
ldd /usr/local/lib/libsasl.so
Matt J Bradshaw wrote:
>hello all,
>
>i'm running into some (painful!) problems wit
Patrick Boutilier wrote:
>
> Matt,
>
> This is most likely the problem of imapd and sasl being linked against
> different libdb's
>
> Can you provide the results of:
>
> ldd /usr/cyrus/bin/imapd
> ldd /usr/cyrus/bin/master
> ldd /usr/local/lib/libsasl.so
Hallo Patrick,
i have got the same Pr
Larry,
It is case sensitive for the right of @. Once I changed my
sendmail configuration to use the masquerade domain as
"cabm.rutgers.edu" and .not. "CABM.RUTGERS.EDU", then
Sieve vaction worked fine.
I could also have it work by not changing sendmail, but changing
the addresses in my Sieve scr
Greetings,
This may be a stupid question, but I have seen enough mail about Sieve
Vacation in the past few days, I had a thought...
Can you specify wildcards for the vacation addresses? Over here, we
have something like 6 different e-mail aliases that all point to the
same account, and what I a
Hey,
how can I tell imspd (verion 1.6) to authenticate via pwcheck like imapd
does it with
sasl_pwcheck_method: pwcheck,
NOT by sasldb ??
There seems to be no imapd.conf in the source-distribution if imsp.
Any idea?
Thanks,
Gruß Ch. Krempe
--
just some updates:
> 1) deliver hangs for two people. I tried to reconstruct the mailboxes (using
> the cyrus user of course) and that hung two. Running reconstruct via strace
> showed that it got stuck when it opened the first cyrus.header file. I moved
> out cyrus.* from the user's inbox
patrick,
thanks so much for your insight and time! you've earned yourself a free
meal if you ever pass through iowa. just look me up. :)
for the sake of anyone else on the list experiencing this problem, here's
how i fixed it... not being an expert it may not be the ideal fix,
though. :)
m
"John C. Amodeo" wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
> This may be a stupid question, but I have seen enough mail about Sieve
> Vacation in the past few days, I had a thought...
>
> Can you specify wildcards for the vacation addresses? Over here, we
> have something like 6 different e-mail aliases that
Devdas Bhagat wrote:
>
> On Fri, 20 Jul 2001, Ken Murchison spewed into the ether:
> >
[...]
> > 3. If you simply change 'user.' to 'domain.', then what is the prefix
> > for the Other User's namespace?
> I didn't get this one.
> Consider devdas@srt and devdas@brd
> The corresponding mailboxe
I just looked at the code and the domain part of each address tested in
vacation is converted to lowercase before comparing them, hence the
right side of the "@" is case-insensitive. I also verified this by
using the sieve 'test' program.
Ken
Shelley Waltz wrote:
>
> Larry,
> It is case sensi
> Potentially stupid question:
>
> If you truely want isolated domains on one server, why not just setup
> one imapd for each domain, listening on a unique IP addresses (via IP
> aliasing, etc), and have each imapd use a separate config file? This
> would not require any changes to the code, and
On Fri, 20 Jul 2001, Ken Murchison spewed into the ether:
> The default Cyrus namespace is:
> * NAMESPACE (("INBOX." ".")) (("user." ".")) (("" "."))
> which means that to access another user's mailbox (ACL permitting) is
> would use 'user.username.folder'.
> Do you intend to change this to:
> *
Why is this? None of the MTAs I've tested are case sensitive in the
local-part
of the address. I regularly recieve mail to my account in a mix of cases
and it
comes through fine.
Chris Audley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
err, maybe you'd better make that
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
F
> On Fri, 20 Jul 2001 16:13:20 -0400,
> Chris Audley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (ca) writes:
ca> Why is this? None of the MTAs I've tested are case sensitive in the
ca> local-part
ca> of the address. I regularly recieve mail to my account in a mix of cases
ca> and it
ca> comes through fine.
I
Quoting Chris Audley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, who wrote:
> Why is this? None of the MTAs I've tested are case sensitive in the
Because domain's are case-insensitive, according to the DNS RFCs, and the
interpretation of the local-part of an address is completely up to the end
system, accorging to RFC
20 matches
Mail list logo
