Re: [Exim] Cyrus/Exim incompatibility

2002-01-25 Thread Philip Hazel
On Thu, 24 Jan 2002, John Holman wrote: My guess is that there is no real standard, but I think it makes sense when passing a message to an MTA via stdin to comply with the conventions of the local operating system. That would mean LF under Unix, CRLF under Windows etc. This seemed to me to

Re: [Exim] Cyrus/Exim incompatibility

2002-01-25 Thread John Holman
At 09:13 25/01/02, Phillip Hazel wrote: On Thu, 24 Jan 2002, John Holman wrote: Actually, if it's true that there are no standards to be upheld, I also think it would be better for Exim (which claims to be a Sendmail clone insofar as the command line interface is concerned) to accept

Re: Cyrus and SSL - not like you've heard that one before...

2002-01-25 Thread birger
Jim Grimmett schrieb am Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 04:07:36PM -: [...] try IMAP (as I've instructed it) but the firewall lets IMAPS through and cyrus is giving the message imapd: refused connection from xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx is it looking into hosts.allow (we're running redhat 6.2)? The client

Logs

2002-01-25 Thread Harris Landgarten
How do you control the verbosity of messages posted to /var/log/messages, maillog and imapd.log? Harris Landgarten

error log entries with 2.1

2002-01-25 Thread Olaf Zaplinski
Hi *, yesterday I switched from sasl-1.5.27 to sasl-2.1.0 and from imapd-2.0.16 to imapd-2.1.1. Everything works fine since then, just as before. But I get unknown log entries. When one mail arrives, the log entries are like this in chronological order: == mail == Jan 25 19:08:40 binky

Re: error log entries with 2.1

2002-01-25 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Fri, 25 Jan 2002, Olaf Zaplinski wrote: Can someone tell me what's going on here please? The unable to get entry point messages are Mostly Harmless (not all modules implement all of a client, server, canon_user, and auxprop plugin). In fact, none do. These messages are logged at the

Re: error log entries with 2.1

2002-01-25 Thread Olaf Zaplinski
Rob Siemborski wrote: On Fri, 25 Jan 2002, Olaf Zaplinski wrote: Can someone tell me what's going on here please? The unable to get entry point messages are Mostly Harmless (not all modules implement all of a client, server, canon_user, and auxprop plugin). In fact, none do. These

Signaled to Death by 11

2002-01-25 Thread Vernon A.. Fort
Hello all, I have a problem for which has consumed me. The master process is reporting the following: Jan 25 09:58:33 mail master[8412]: process 18150 exited, signaled to death by 11 What I have done: 1. Re-compiled both cyrus-sasl and cyrus-imap using db3

SASL Messages - Syslog and Auth.log

2002-01-25 Thread OCNS Consulting
Hi: I recently upgraded/installed: - Cyrus SASL 2 Libraries - Cyrus IMAP 2.1.1 - OpenLDAP 2.0.21 All were configured with Kerberos version 1.2.3 DES. Messages from syslog are: imapd[12221]: unable to dlopen /usr/lib/sasl2/libdigestmd5.so.2:

Re: Signaled to Death by 11

2002-01-25 Thread Ramiro Morales
Vernon, Maybe your first 128 MB memory modules are defective? If they are the same in both test you reported (that is you added 256 MB to get 384 MB) and your hardware allowd try making another test without them installed. On 25 Jan 2002 at 12:14, Vernon A.. Fort wrote about Signaled to

Another Death by 11

2002-01-25 Thread Bernard Frit
I'm currently running smoothly 4 cyrus-imap servers and when trying to add 3 more I got the _funky_ Death by 11 when telnetting 143 (see logs below). The old servers are under mandrake 7.1 with - cyrus-imapd-2.0.7 - cyrus-sasl-1.5.24 - openldap-1.2.7 - pam-ldap or sasl_ldap_mysql.patch The new

Re: dothack and cyrus 2.0.16

2002-01-25 Thread Jeremy Howard
We are locking for dothack patch in order to be able to create logins with dots... The alternate separator patch is incorporated into 2.1, which provides the same functionality.

Re: dothack and cyrus 2.0.16

2002-01-25 Thread Joe Rhett
We are locking for dothack patch in order to be able to create logins with dots... The alternate separator patch is incorporated into 2.1, which provides the same functionality. Yes, yes, but 2.1 requires the new SASL and all those problems. Since the 'final answer' is stick with 2.0