Re: Migrating User mailboxes from one machine to another

Le mercredi 24 avril 2002, 10:06:18 ou environ twk a écrit: Atif Ghaffar wrote: Hi Alex, Did you find a solution? If yes, please share with us. I would also like to move users from one box to another from time to time, for example if the server needs to be upgraded or repaired etc.

Sieve RBL extension?

I'm trying to create a Realtime Blackhole List extension to Sieve, so I can do stuff like this: require [fileinto, x-rbl, x-rbl-reject]; if header :contains [to,cc,bcc] [EMAIL PROTECTED] { fileinto INBOX; } elsif x-rbl :types [127.0.0.2, 127.0.0.4, 127.0.0.5, 127.0.0.6,

Re: Sieve RBL extension?

Scott Lamb wrote: I'm trying to create a Realtime Blackhole List extension to Sieve, so I can do Doesn't functionality like this belong in the MTA? -- Kenneth Murchison Oceana Matrix Ltd. Software Engineer 21 Princeton Place 716-662-8973 x26 Orchard Park, NY 14127 --PGP

spam sieve extension

I've gotten a handful of requests for the spam sieve extension I mentioned yesterday. The diffs aren't too big, so I'll post them to the list. The diffs add a test to sieve that passes the message to SpamAssassin. If SpamAssassin scores the messages as spam, the test fails, otherwise the test

Re: subfolders

At 22:02 24.04.2002 +0400, Yuri Pimenov wrote: could you tell us more about your config: cyrus version, delivery meth, MTA etc. If you use sendmail/lmtp I think direct delivery will be impossible if you enable .forward. ingo hi! is it possible to deliver messages right into subfolder in

Re: Sieve RBL extension?

Ken Murchison wrote: Scott Lamb wrote: I'm trying to create a Realtime Blackhole List extension to Sieve, so I can do Doesn't functionality like this belong in the MTA? The problem with doing it in the MTA is control. End users do not control their MTA, but they may have

Re: using spam control tools

Jeremy == Jeremy Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Jeremy Neat. Our approach is to use a Postfix content filter. It Jeremy checks the recipients against a DB to see if anyone have Jeremy spam protection turned on, and if one does then it adds Jeremy the SpamAssassin headers. A

Re: Sieve RBL extension?

Scott == Scott Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Scott My question: How do I find out the SMTP client's IP Scott address? I hoped to see this in the envelope stuff, but I Scott don't. Nothing else seems to use it. I know Postfix makes Scott this information available in the

default port of sieve

Hi! I got a maybe dumb question: which is the default port for sieve? Since SuSE 8.0 in /etc/services is defined as the sieve port. the php-sieve lib uses 2000. Which is correct? SuSE or php-sieve? thanks a lot rgds Luc

Re: Sieve RBL extension?

On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 01:39:07PM -0500, Scott Lamb wrote: I started by making a patch to Postfix that would just add the X-RBL-Warning header as some other MTAs do. IMHO think this is the Right Thing(TM). It's more likely to get into graphical Sieve generators this way. I'd never use

cyrus sieve authentication imapd-2.1.3

Hi, I have IMAPD-2.1.3 my RH7.2 system. I am using LDap as my authentication usinng PAM my /etc/imapd.conf says: # less /etc/imapd.conf configdirectory: /var/imap partition-default: /var/spool/imap admins: cyrus allowanonymouslogin: no # To use

Sieve + RBL = SICK!

Now i know i RARELY ever post messages but i'll be quite honest. This is quite Sickening, RBL is a MTA implementation not needed to be done via Sieve, and as for spamassasin you can always write decent header checks and body checks for postfix to use. I am sure there is the same option in

Re: Sieve + RBL = SICK!

Scott M Likens wrote: This is quite Sickening, RBL is a MTA implementation not needed to be done via Sieve, and as for spamassasin you can always write decent header checks and body checks for postfix to use. I am sure there is the same option in sendmail. If you have some idea how I

Re: Sieve + RBL = SICK!

Scott Lamb schrieb am Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 11:27:10PM -0500: Scott M Likens wrote: This is quite Sickening, RBL is a MTA implementation not needed to be done via Sieve, and as for spamassasin you can always write decent header checks and body checks for postfix to use. I am sure there is

Re: Sieve + RBL = SICK!

On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 11:27:10PM -0500, Scott Lamb wrote: Scott M Likens wrote: If you have some idea how I could accomplish my stated goals on the MTA side, please share. I've given my reasons for this approach. Why do you feel so strongly that this belongs in the MTA? Because it

Re: Sieve RBL extension?

Scott Lamb schrieb am Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 12:12:52PM -0500: I'm trying to create a Realtime Blackhole List extension to Sieve, so I can do stuff like this: require [fileinto, x-rbl, x-rbl-reject]; if header :contains [to,cc,bcc] [EMAIL PROTECTED] { fileinto INBOX; }