I would like to migrate my user accounts in an ldap tree.
I don't have the passwords in clear text, is it possible to use the md5 unix
account passwords by moving the md5 passwords in the ldap tree?
Did somebody manage such a migration ?
Thanks Greg
Bruhin Gregor schrieb:
I would like to migrate my user accounts in an ldap tree.
I don't have the passwords in clear text, is it possible to use the md5 unix
account passwords by moving the md5 passwords in the ldap tree?
Did somebody manage such a migration ?
Yes, I did and it works
On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 05:56:52PM +0800, Lin Wang wrote:
When I installed db-4.0.14, cyrus-sasl-2.1.6 and cyrus-imapd-2.1.5 on a new
Solaris platform, with gcc-2.95.3, make-3.79.1 and perl-5.8.0, which went
through on another machine.
Unfortunately this time there was a strange problem
Hi-
I'm having a problem deleting a Cyrus mailbox. Here is what happens:
[root@Lunar]:/home/gchagnon su mail.admin
bash-2.05b$ cyradm localhost
IMAP Password:
Lunar cm testmailbox
Lunar dm testmailbox
deletemailbox: Permission denied
Lunar
mail.admin exists in my ldap database. Thanks for any
Hi,
We are having some difficultly with Eudora 5.2 and attachments. What
happens is that the user gets a mailfile that's supposed to have an
attachment but Eudora doesn't show an attachment. This doesn't happen all
the time, just some of the time. This is with Cyrus 2.1.11 on a Solaris 8
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Gregory Chagnon wrote:
I'm having a problem deleting a Cyrus mailbox. Here is what happens:
[root@Lunar]:/home/gchagnon su mail.admin
bash-2.05b$ cyradm localhost
IMAP Password:
Lunar cm testmailbox
Lunar dm testmailbox
deletemailbox: Permission denied
Lunar
does
Cyrus does not automatically have delete permission, you must add it with a
sam command before you may delete a mailbox.
c*
- Original Message -
From: Gregory Chagnon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 9:39 AM
Subject: Can't delete a mailbox
Hi-
Yes, Eudora has a problem with boundaries generation if a message is created
in a certain fashion (text, HTML, and attachment in one doc), this was
supposed to have been corrected with 5.2, however if the sender is on an
older version you are still SOL. Qualcomm is trying desperatly it seems to
Jim,
Interesting, but yes, Stanford did try to patch Cyrus imapd to
compensate and it seemed to work with some older versions of the source, but
stopped when I upgraded past 2.1.4, our best results have come from
upgrading users to 5.2 or another client altogether.
-David
Hi Ken, Per!
I just did some testing myself with Outlook 2000 and Outlook Express 6.
I couldn't get either client to hang after doing APPENDs (with IDLE
enabled). OE does close the connection after calling IDLE after the
final APPEND however.
I'm not convinced that this is a server
On 11 Feb 2003 at 18:32, Hasso Meyer-Jordan wrote:
(I wouldn't be surprised about brain-dead Microsoft developers! ;-)))
Perhaps badly payed immigrants of India [like unskilled worker]. )
Cheers, Hasso
Please, please, in the future try to keep you stupid racist
comments out of this
Okay I'm at the end of my rope. If I can't get this fixed I have to
switch MS Exchange...
When sending a message the client is doing one of the following 10% of
the time.
Application has unexpectedly quit.
this dialog
Error
The server returned the following error
Unable to add message
Hi,
Ok, thanks for the information.
Jim
At 09:39 AM 2/11/2003 -0800, David Chait wrote:
Jim,
Interesting, but yes, Stanford did try to patch Cyrus imapd to
compensate and it seemed to work with some older versions of the source, but
stopped when I upgraded past 2.1.4, our best
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Hasso Meyer-Jordan wrote:
(I wouldn't be surprised about brain-dead Microsoft developers! ;-)))
Perhaps badly payed immigrants of India [like unskilled worker]. )
I can't speak for the administrators of this list but as a normal user of
Cyrus IMAPD I turn to this mailing
Eric S. Pulley wrote:
Okay I'm at the end of my rope. If I can't get this fixed I have to
switch MS Exchange...
When sending a message the client is doing one of the following 10% of
the time.
Application has unexpectedly quit.
this dialog
Error
After doing the latest update from cvs I see these lines in syslog from
time to time! Everything works well so I think I need not concentrate on
these lines, right ?
--Christian--
Feb 11 20:10:00 mail imap[26930]: [ID 892804 local6.debug] Could not
shut down filedescriptor 0: Transport
Either turn down your syslog level, or ignore them. They're harmless.
-Rob
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Christian Schulte wrote:
After doing the latest update from cvs I see these lines in syslog from
time to time! Everything works well so I think I need not concentrate on
these lines, right ?
Okay here are some logs:
the first part is a successful sent message noted by my added
-SESSION flag to make it easier to read for you.
Questions:
why in Session 2 did it do a LIST? The user was just sending email not
opening the Sent Items folder why would it LIST some of the times and
Eric S. Pulley wrote:
Okay here are some logs:
the first part is a successful sent message noted by my added
-SESSION flag to make it easier to read for you.
Are these connections from the same running client (separate threads) or
two entirely different sessions?
Questions:
why
On Thursday 06 February 2003 12:10 pm, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Thu, 06 Feb 2003, Dave McMurtrie wrote:
Would this actually work anyway? If the parent were to pass a file
You can send descriptors over sockets if your unix kernel supports it.
Linux does, and apparently so does
Hi Avtar Gill!
(I wouldn't be surprised about brain-dead Microsoft developers! ;-)))
Perhaps badly payed immigrants of India [like unskilled worker]. )
I can't speak for the administrators of this list but as a normal user of
Cyrus IMAPD I turn to this mailing list for technical help and
Hi Ramiro!
(I wouldn't be surprised about brain-dead Microsoft developers! ;-)))
Perhaps badly payed immigrants of India [like unskilled worker]. )
Please, please, in the future try to keep you stupid racist
comments out of this technical discussion mailing list.
Sorry for your
These sessions are from the same client and same thread. There are in
fact the same session I just split it so you could see the successful
and failed one more easily
The ^M is not copy and paste crud it's in the log file plan as day.
It's not very repeatable. It's happening about 10% of the
Eric S. Pulley wrote:
These sessions are from the same client and same thread. There are in
fact the same session I just split it so you could see the successful
and failed one more easily
The ^M is not copy and paste crud it's in the log file plan as day.
I doubt that this is being
Also, are you able to use user specific spamassassin settings? This
is the one goal that set me on this quest in the first place. Of
course simplifying my sendmail config is looking more attractive too.
I noticed you set DROPPRIVS=1. I did the same in my /etc/procmailrc,
and procmail logs a
Eric,
Did you ever try reconstruct -r on the affected mailboxes. And yes, I
strongly recommend skiplist. It has solved some problems for me which I
still don't really understand why.
Simon
Ken Murchison schrieb:
Eric S. Pulley wrote:
These sessions are from the same client and same
26 matches
Mail list logo
