Re: Cyrus Imap final setup problems

Thanks Dan, You hit the nail on the head with the virtual domains. I had someone come in to set this up for me and when I found out they knew as little as I did I took it over. There was a lot to do and moving over to vitual domains I was originally going to do immediatly but later decided to make

Re: Puzzling error with fresh install of 2.3.14

Okay, I spotted the difference between my two systems. The first one running 2.3.13 has BDB 4.2 installed. The second had BDB 4.1, which is I guess what FreeBSD Ports uses by default if not specified. I upgraded to 4.2 and compiled Cyrus. All is well. Patrick On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 4:01 PM, patr

Puzzling error with fresh install of 2.3.14

I've just installed Cyrus IMAP 2.3.14 on a fresh FreeBSD 7.2 machine, and I'm getting some puzzling errors when I start up: Jul 9 15:40:19 marzipan ctl_cyrusdb[11648]: archiving database file: /var/imap/annotations.db Jul 9 15:40:19 marzipan ctl_cyrusdb[11648]: DBERROR: error listing log files:

Re: Security impact of lmtpd with pre-auth

On Thu, 9 Jul 2009, Reinaldo de Carvalho wrote: > On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 2:05 AM, Pascal > Gienger wrote: >> >> Imagine a Cyrus Box only accepting LMTP connections, no sendmail, no >> Postfix, no other SMTP MTA running on it. >> Then imagine a frontend smtp relay delivering directly via LMTP over

Re: DBERROR with Cyrus 2.2.12

On Thu, 9 Jul 2009, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: >> Would it be helpful to others, it is to me, to include the cited list >> message below on that same wiki page telling others how to convert from >> one backend to another? > > Page 120 - 121 of my 'book' has an example of cvt_cyrusdb >

Re: Automatically moving marked mails?

At Thu, 09 Jul 2009 11:27:55 -0400, Jorey Bump wrote: Subject: Re: Automatically moving marked mails? > > Ian Eiloart wrote, at 07/09/2009 10:46 AM: > > > > Not true. The MTA can decide *per recipient* whether to accept mail from a > > specific sender. > > How? just return a 4xx or 5xx respo

Re: sieve configuration (was Automatically moving marked mails?)

At Thu, 9 Jul 2009 10:39:28 -0500, Mike Eggleston wrote: Subject: sieve configuration (was Automatically moving marked mails?) > > On Thu, 09 Jul 2009, Greg A. Woods might have said: > > > > (even use of the vacation feature is questionable, especially since it's > > not usually configured in th

Re: Security impact of lmtpd with pre-auth

On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 2:05 AM, Pascal Gienger wrote: > > Imagine a Cyrus Box only accepting LMTP connections, no sendmail, no > Postfix, no other SMTP MTA running on it. > Then imagine a frontend smtp relay delivering directly via LMTP over TCP > to your Cyrus box. You can use lmtp auth then to pr

Re: DBERROR with Cyrus 2.2.12

> Would it be helpful to others, it is to me, to include the cited list message > below on that same wiki page telling others how to convert from one backend > to another? Page 120 - 121 of my 'book' has an example of cvt_cyrusdb

Re: DBERROR with Cyrus 2.2.12

On Thu, 09 Jul 2009, Harms Consulting IT support desk might have said: > I'm also not an expert but I had these messages early on with my setup > and the resolution was to switch from Berkeley DB to the native skiplist > format. This was covered a couple of weeks ago on this list. Search the > l

Re: Automatically moving marked mails?

At Thu, 09 Jul 2009 15:46:42 +0100, Ian Eiloart wrote: Subject: Re: Automatically moving marked mails? > > There > probably aren't any SIEVE implementations that do what I suggest, and the > implementations wouldn't be simple, but there's no principled reason that > it shouldn't. Yes, I suppo

sieve configuration (was Automatically moving marked mails?)

On Thu, 09 Jul 2009, Greg A. Woods might have said: > (even use of the vacation feature is questionable, especially since it's > not usually configured in the proper way) And what is the proper way to configure Sieve and vacation? Mike Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/ Cyrus

Re: Automatically moving marked mails?

At Thu, 09 Jul 2009 10:39:54 +0100, Ian Eiloart wrote: Subject: Re: Automatically moving marked mails? > > Except that the sieve server ought to be on the border MTA, so that the > user can tell the server to reject the message at SMTP time. Except that's not what Sieve is for. Sieve should _N

Re: Automatically moving marked mails?

Ian Eiloart wrote, at 07/09/2009 10:46 AM: > > --On 9 July 2009 09:54:31 -0400 Adam Tauno Williams > wrote: > Ian Eiloart wrote, at 07/09/2009 05:39 AM: > Except that the sieve server ought to be on the border MTA, so that the > user can tell the server to reject the message at SMT

Re: Automatically moving marked mails?

--On 9 July 2009 09:54:31 -0400 Adam Tauno Williams wrote: >>> Ian Eiloart wrote, at 07/09/2009 05:39 AM: Except that the sieve server ought to be on the border MTA, so that the user can tell the server to reject the message at SMTP time. >>> That's not feasible for mail with multipl

Re: Automatically moving marked mails?

>> Ian Eiloart wrote, at 07/09/2009 05:39 AM: >>> Except that the sieve server ought to be on the border MTA, so that the >>> user can tell the server to reject the message at SMTP time. >> That's not feasible for mail with multiple recipients. > It is if your rule is to reject all email from a spe

Re: Automatically moving marked mails?

--On 9 July 2009 09:15:32 -0400 Jorey Bump wrote: > Ian Eiloart wrote, at 07/09/2009 05:39 AM: > >> Except that the sieve server ought to be on the border MTA, so that the >> user can tell the server to reject the message at SMTP time. > > That's not feasible for mail with multiple recipients.

Re: Automatically moving marked mails?

Ian Eiloart wrote, at 07/09/2009 05:39 AM: > Except that the sieve server ought to be on the border MTA, so that the > user can tell the server to reject the message at SMTP time. That's not feasible for mail with multiple recipients. Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/ Cyrus Wi

Re: Automatically moving marked mails?

--On 8 July 2009 12:04:05 -0400 "Greg A. Woods" wrote: > > What would be better for any and all IMAP MUAs would be a rules editor > to write and edit Sieve rules and which would work with Cyrus IMAP for > managing server-side filtering (but I personally wouldn't use it either > -- I'd just edi

Re: tls_sessions.db will not created

Quoting Martin Schweizer : Hello Pascal 2009/7/9 Pascal Gienger : Martin Schweizer schrieb: a) Is SSL enabled? Did you try a connect via imaps or imap/starttls? Since I do not need imaps so I did not activated this option. b) what's in the log  after this connect? c) is the tls_session.

Re: tls_sessions.db will not created

Hello Pascal 2009/7/9 Pascal Gienger : > Martin Schweizer schrieb: >> >> Hello >> >> I have the following system >> FreeBSD acsvfbsd06.acutronic.ch 7.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE #1: >> Thu Jun 11 16:16:57 CEST 2009 >> mar...@acsvfbsd06.acutronic.ch:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC  amd64 >> >> and I

Re: tls_sessions.db will not created

Martin Schweizer schrieb: > Hello > > I have the following system > FreeBSD acsvfbsd06.acutronic.ch 7.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE #1: > Thu Jun 11 16:16:57 CEST 2009 > mar...@acsvfbsd06.acutronic.ch:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 > > and I fresh installed Cyrus IMAPD v2.3.14. > In my /var

tls_sessions.db will not created

Hello I have the following system FreeBSD acsvfbsd06.acutronic.ch 7.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE #1: Thu Jun 11 16:16:57 CEST 2009 mar...@acsvfbsd06.acutronic.ch:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 and I fresh installed Cyrus IMAPD v2.3.14. In my /var/imap directory the file annotations.db will