Hello
I have the following system
FreeBSD acsvfbsd06.acutronic.ch 7.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE #1:
Thu Jun 11 16:16:57 CEST 2009
mar...@acsvfbsd06.acutronic.ch:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
and I fresh installed Cyrus IMAPD v2.3.14.
In my /var/imap directory the file annotations.db
Martin Schweizer schrieb:
Hello
I have the following system
FreeBSD acsvfbsd06.acutronic.ch 7.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE #1:
Thu Jun 11 16:16:57 CEST 2009
mar...@acsvfbsd06.acutronic.ch:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
and I fresh installed Cyrus IMAPD v2.3.14.
In my /var/imap
Hello Pascal
2009/7/9 Pascal Gienger pascal.gien...@uni-konstanz.de:
Martin Schweizer schrieb:
Hello
I have the following system
FreeBSD acsvfbsd06.acutronic.ch 7.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE #1:
Thu Jun 11 16:16:57 CEST 2009
mar...@acsvfbsd06.acutronic.ch:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
Quoting Martin Schweizer schweizer.mar...@gmail.com:
Hello Pascal
2009/7/9 Pascal Gienger pascal.gien...@uni-konstanz.de:
Martin Schweizer schrieb:
a) Is SSL enabled? Did you try a connect via imaps or imap/starttls?
Since I do not need imaps so I did not activated this option.
b)
--On 8 July 2009 12:04:05 -0400 Greg A. Woods woods-cy...@weird.com
wrote:
What would be better for any and all IMAP MUAs would be a rules editor
to write and edit Sieve rules and which would work with Cyrus IMAP for
managing server-side filtering (but I personally wouldn't use it either
Ian Eiloart wrote, at 07/09/2009 05:39 AM:
Except that the sieve server ought to be on the border MTA, so that the
user can tell the server to reject the message at SMTP time.
That's not feasible for mail with multiple recipients.
Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/
Cyrus
Ian Eiloart wrote, at 07/09/2009 05:39 AM:
Except that the sieve server ought to be on the border MTA, so that the
user can tell the server to reject the message at SMTP time.
That's not feasible for mail with multiple recipients.
It is if your rule is to reject all email from a specific
--On 9 July 2009 09:15:32 -0400 Jorey Bump l...@joreybump.com wrote:
Ian Eiloart wrote, at 07/09/2009 05:39 AM:
Except that the sieve server ought to be on the border MTA, so that the
user can tell the server to reject the message at SMTP time.
That's not feasible for mail with multiple
--On 9 July 2009 09:54:31 -0400 Adam Tauno Williams a...@morrison-ind.com
wrote:
Ian Eiloart wrote, at 07/09/2009 05:39 AM:
Except that the sieve server ought to be on the border MTA, so that the
user can tell the server to reject the message at SMTP time.
That's not feasible for mail with
Ian Eiloart wrote, at 07/09/2009 10:46 AM:
--On 9 July 2009 09:54:31 -0400 Adam Tauno Williams a...@morrison-ind.com
wrote:
Ian Eiloart wrote, at 07/09/2009 05:39 AM:
Except that the sieve server ought to be on the border MTA, so that the
user can tell the server to reject the message at
At Thu, 09 Jul 2009 10:39:54 +0100, Ian Eiloart i...@sussex.ac.uk wrote:
Subject: Re: Automatically moving marked mails?
Except that the sieve server ought to be on the border MTA, so that the
user can tell the server to reject the message at SMTP time.
Except that's not what Sieve is for.
On Thu, 09 Jul 2009, Greg A. Woods might have said:
snip
(even use of the vacation feature is questionable, especially since it's
not usually configured in the proper way)
And what is the proper way to configure Sieve and vacation?
Mike
Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/
At Thu, 09 Jul 2009 15:46:42 +0100, Ian Eiloart i...@sussex.ac.uk wrote:
Subject: Re: Automatically moving marked mails?
There
probably aren't any SIEVE implementations that do what I suggest, and the
implementations wouldn't be simple, but there's no principled reason that
it shouldn't.
On Thu, 09 Jul 2009, Harms Consulting IT support desk might have said:
snip
I'm also not an expert but I had these messages early on with my setup
and the resolution was to switch from Berkeley DB to the native skiplist
format. This was covered a couple of weeks ago on this list. Search the
Would it be helpful to others, it is to me, to include the cited list message
below on that same wiki page telling others how to convert from one backend
to another?
Page 120 - 121 of my 'book' has an example of cvt_cyrusdb
http://docs.opengroupware.org/Members/whitemice/wmogag/file_view
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 2:05 AM, Pascal
Giengerpascal.gien...@uni-konstanz.de wrote:
Imagine a Cyrus Box only accepting LMTP connections, no sendmail, no
Postfix, no other SMTP MTA running on it.
Then imagine a frontend smtp relay delivering directly via LMTP over TCP
to your Cyrus box. You
At Thu, 9 Jul 2009 10:39:28 -0500, Mike Eggleston mikee...@mac.com wrote:
Subject: sieve configuration (was Automatically moving marked mails?)
On Thu, 09 Jul 2009, Greg A. Woods might have said:
(even use of the vacation feature is questionable, especially since it's
not usually
At Thu, 09 Jul 2009 11:27:55 -0400, Jorey Bump l...@joreybump.com wrote:
Subject: Re: Automatically moving marked mails?
Ian Eiloart wrote, at 07/09/2009 10:46 AM:
Not true. The MTA can decide *per recipient* whether to accept mail from a
specific sender.
How?
just return a 4xx or
On Thu, 9 Jul 2009, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
Would it be helpful to others, it is to me, to include the cited list
message below on that same wiki page telling others how to convert from
one backend to another?
Page 120 - 121 of my 'book' has an example of cvt_cyrusdb
On Thu, 9 Jul 2009, Reinaldo de Carvalho wrote:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 2:05 AM, Pascal
Giengerpascal.gien...@uni-konstanz.de wrote:
Imagine a Cyrus Box only accepting LMTP connections, no sendmail, no
Postfix, no other SMTP MTA running on it.
Then imagine a frontend smtp relay delivering
I've just installed Cyrus IMAP 2.3.14 on a fresh FreeBSD 7.2 machine,
and I'm getting some puzzling errors when I start up:
Jul 9 15:40:19 marzipan ctl_cyrusdb[11648]: archiving database file:
/var/imap/annotations.db
Jul 9 15:40:19 marzipan ctl_cyrusdb[11648]: DBERROR: error listing
log files:
Okay, I spotted the difference between my two systems. The first one
running 2.3.13 has BDB 4.2 installed. The second had BDB 4.1, which is
I guess what FreeBSD Ports uses by default if not specified. I
upgraded to 4.2 and compiled Cyrus. All is well.
Patrick
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 4:01 PM,
Thanks Dan,
You hit the nail on the head with the virtual domains. I had someone come
in to set this up for me and when I found out they knew as little as I did I
took it over. There was a lot to do and moving over to vitual domains I was
originally going to do immediatly but later decided to
23 matches
Mail list logo
