Guy Plunkett wrote:
> Use Mulberry...
Mulberry is not bad, and it seems to be the most full-featured
IMAP client out there, but...
a) I need to support users who are already used to Outlook
and won't switch for any reason, and...
b) Mulberry's UI is one that you could love or hate... it
c
Am I missing something, or does Outlook not support IMAP server-side
search?
:j
--
Jürgen Botz | While differing widely in the various
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | little bits we know, in our infinite
| ignorance we are all equal
Ken Murchison wrote:
> [...] we are leaning towards making it dependent on SASL v2.
> [...]
> We would like to get as much feedback (pro and con) on this as possible
> before we make a final decision.
Do it! It's not like there'll be a "better" time in the future...
:j
Amos Gouaux wrote:
> Well, my inbox currently has 3568 messages in it and PINE pops it
> open in a jiffy. You need to keep in mind that Cyrus caches things
> like the headers. See the four "cyrus.*" files in each folder.
Right, but this may still be a problem because those files are in
the same
I just installed Cyrus for the first time to evaluate it as a possible
mailserver to use at my company. I was surprised to find that each
folder/mailbox is a single directory... my experience is that on
typical Unix filesystems (UFS, ext2) this would cause severe performance
degradation once a m
