Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 12:01:24 -0500 (EST)
From: Rob Siemborski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Joe Hrbek wrote:
> Hi, quick question. Assuming I have the space (I have 4, 146gb
> scsi ultra320 drives in a raid setup with dual xeon processors
> and 2 gb of ram), what
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 17:11:39 -0400 (EDT)
From: Rob Siemborski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[...]
No, fcntl is not the default. I'll have to look at the documentation.
--with-lock=flock should fix this for you though if it makes a difference.
Except that it has been since 2.1.7:
> Change d
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 12:40:23 -0400
From: Ken Murchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[...PROXY_IDLE...]
> I'm guessing its since we never really tested it. I've added this as Bug
> 2111.
Actually, I have tested it (since I wrote it) and it appears to work in
all modes.
I'm pretty sur
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 11:11:41 -0400 (EDT)
From: Rob Siemborski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Yep. Arch dislikes mixing PIC and non-PIC code inside a
> > relocatable object.
>
> Correct. On Solaris, I build lib/ and perl/sieve/lib with -fPIC
> just to build cyrus-imap perl stuff.
Nikos,
Sorry, I don't understand your post. Was it a request for some change?
Additional documentation?
confused,
Larry
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 09:17:02 -0500
From: Ken Murchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[...]
The majority of imapd's work is not done in imap* files. There are 80
LOG_DEBUG entries in the imap/ directory, and 141 in 2.1.12.
This is in addition to all of the LOG_INFO, LOG_NOTICE, ... -- 990
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 11:24:52 -0800
From: Ben Poliakoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[...]
I know it's vaguely off topic, but it's certainly related to cyrus-imap;
can anyone point to some sendmail config tips that make it pass this
info to LMTP?
Is this passing of "authid" supposed to
--On Thursday, March 13, 2003 3:01 PM -0500 Jared Watkins
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've not been able to find the answer to this in the docs or mailing
list... I'd like to use the snapshot feature of the linux volume
manager to take block level snaps of the cyrus databases and mailstore at
re
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 15:13:30 -0500
From: Jim Howell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[...]
This is all with Cyrus 2.1.11 on a V880 with 32GB of memory with Solaris 8
and, Sendmail 8.12.8. Anyone seen this before? Thanks.
What sort of database backend are you using? (cyradm version should help
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 07:33:01 -0300
From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The right thing to do is to port all SNMP support to native net-snmp syntax,
but that requires rewriting the SNMP code in Cyrus.
And this is something that we'll probably do when we upgrade to u
>I encountered this exact situation (directories manually deleted,
>leading to an unreconstructable mailbox) about a month ago. The solution
>we chose was to export the mailboxes db (ctl_mboxlist -d), delete the
>bogus entries from the textfile, then import it back in.
>
>Howev
From: "Rob Mueller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 08:22:09 +1100
[...]
In the case of cyrus, I think you can quite happily stick with the
multi-process model, I wasn't advocating moving to a threaded model. The
discussion started due to an issue with killing child proces
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 12:30:21 -0500 (EST)
From: David A Powicki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[...]
This computer seems happy and fast in all respects, except for
mailbox creations (4 seconds) and deletions (about 2 seconds) and
ACL updates (2 seconds). A truss of an imapd that creates a
* a generic lock debugging strategy...
The first question is what OS are you running on? If this is Linux,
applying the poll-style locking will probably mask whatever the
problem is. If it's something else:
. processes get stuck waiting for a lock (truss shows stuck process in
fcntl)
. the pro
From: Fritz Test <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 09 Feb 2003 11:25:37 +0100
[...]
With help of the analysis of Jeremy (Thanks) I patched the function
mkgmtime, such that it works for me now. The problem is, that gmtime(&t)
returns a null pointer for my 64-bit system if t is out of some ran
Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 15:44:17 +0100 (CET)
From: Per Steinar Iversen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I just tried to copy a large number of messages from an Outlook PST file
to an IMAP server running Cyrus 2.1.12, but Outlook 2002 SP2 would not
cooperate. As test I then tried copying to an old
From: "Stephen L. Ulmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2003 16:57:15 -0500
[...]
Hmmm... what does Sendmail do? It's got lots of children, but still
manages to refuse connections when it gets busy (RefuseLA)... I kinda
like that behavior. I definitely like it better than k
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2003 18:51:35 +0100
From: Sebastian Hagedorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[...]
Wouldn't it be possible (and better) to refuse further connections instead
of having to wait for them to time out? Maybe I haven't thought this
through properly, but it seems to me as if that w
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2003 14:04:38 +0100
From: Sebastian Hagedorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[...]
0x402e3bee in __select () from /lib/i686/libc.so.6
(gdb) bt
#0 0x402e3bee in __select () from /lib/i686/libc.so.6
#1 0x0811a994 in __DTOR_END__ ()
#2 0x0808410c in getword ()
#3 0x08
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 03:55:04 -0600
From: Phil Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I'm looking for the description of multiple domains in the archive
as someone mentioned. Is there a way to get a list of the threads
alone, and not all the messages, like in a fully collapsed form?
Since
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 23:25:29 +0100
From: Sebastian Hagedorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[...]
When the number of impad processes reaches 200, no more processes are
spawned, just as it should be. However, sometimes, not immediately, but
definitely after a while *all* imapd processes will
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 17:24:17 +1300 (NZDT)
[...]
Along the way, I've discovered a related bug in lmtpd (2.1.11). If a
misconfigured client sends a message with lines longer than 8190 chars,
the following code in imap/lmtpengine.c (lines 672-675) will incorre
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:48:49 -0500
From: John Alton Tamplin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[...]
There seem to be 3 places that have to be dealt with:
1) login
2) message delivery
3) mailbox names
It seems like 1 is very localized and a trivial change in
auth_canonifyid (if it
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:31:15 -0500
From: John Alton Tamplin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lawrence Greenfield wrote:
>I'm kinda unhappy about the limited scope of the patch. It makes
>usernames case-insensitive during delivery, but they're case-sensitive
>ever
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 17:32:10 -0200
From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Ted Cabeen wrote:
> So is this patch going to make it into 2.1? I have the same
> problem here with LMTP downcasing, and would like to have a
> solution that doesn't
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 18:22:06 -0200
From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Wed, 08 Jan 2003, Rob Siemborski wrote:
> What bug number is this?
My bad, I did not add it to bugzilla, I just sent it to cyrus-bugs, a long
time ago. Hein Roehrig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--On Sunday, January 05, 2003 7:22 PM +0100 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try,
LIBS="-lkstat -lkvm" ./configure ...
I now had a try and it finally compiled perfectly ! Now, is that somehow
normal that I need to do that, shouldn't this be automatically done with
the configure script ?
UCD SNMP ca
--On Saturday, January 04, 2003 11:56 AM -0800 Doug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi!
I'm looking at upgrading from a Cyrus 1.5 to a more current Cyrus
Imap, and have noticed that the 'reconstruct -m' function is not
implemented. I think we know that things happen.
Is there any way in version
--On Thursday, December 26, 2002 11:55 AM -0500 Scott Adkins
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[... sendmail +detail delivery ...]
Has anyone else had this problem (plussed folder emails sent to sendmail
that is configured to talk to LMTP directly, either my UNIX domain socket
or my TCP socket)? If so,
--On Wednesday, January 01, 2003 9:21 PM -0500 Igor Brezac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
[...]
If you are on Solaris, I highly recommend the doors IPC method over the
UNIX socket method, since we began to see very bizarre problems under
load.
You might run into problems if you use ldap api and door
--On Friday, January 03, 2003 12:48 PM -0700 "Kevin P. Fleming"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is all working fine, except that I had to add my dummy
authentication user (which I create solely for Exim to authenticate
itself to lmtpd with) to the "admins" entry in /etc/imapd.conf. I had to
do th
--On Monday, December 30, 2002 12:52 AM -0200 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The codepaths in master are MUCH easier to audit, so I think it overall
enhances the security of Cyrus to run services inside chroot jails. IF it
is done right.
Any comments? Should I submit thi
--On Friday, December 06, 2002 1:27 AM +0100 Simon Josefsson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Any comment on why it took over a month to react to this reported
vulnerability?
Hi Simon,
You'll note that it has taken me almost a month to respond to your message.
This is mostly because I get very dist
--On Wednesday, December 18, 2002 4:32 PM +1100 Rob Mueller
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Given that it's for the deliver.db, which is used for duplicate delivery
suppression and sieve, will an aborted locker result in sieve not
correctly processing an email?
I don't think so. Since Sieve always u
--On Monday, December 23, 2002 10:37 AM -0600 Scott Smith
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just checked out the 2.2 branch and set it up on a machine here...It
built just fine and I got the virtdomain stuff working fine.
My only problem is that I am getting the DBERROR messages about
/var/imap/db/sk
John's patch for flushing seen state looks reasonable to me.
Clients should be prepared for unsolicited \Seen responses at any time, so
that shouldn't be a problem.
Larry
--On Monday, December 02, 2002 10:43 AM +1100 Rob Mueller
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm just wondering why cyrus automatically adds a content type charset to
every message, even if none is specified in the message itself. For
example:
[...]
So there's no "Content-Type" line in the message, but
--On Tuesday, December 10, 2002 4:18 PM -0400 "Marc G. Fournier"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What are they, and how do you clean them out?
I have stuff dating back to march 19th in there:
Mar 19 2002 27181-1016554210
just delete, or is there somethign I should be fixing?
Most likely cause
--On Tuesday, December 10, 2002 4:35 PM -0500 Jay Levitt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Am I correct in assuming that the "db" directory doesn't need to be backed
up - in fact should not be backed up - and I should instead be backing up
the db.backup1 and db.backup2 dirs and using reconstruct to recr
--On Tuesday, December 24, 2002 11:57 PM -0200 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 24 Dec 2002, Lawrence Greenfield wrote:
--On Tuesday, December 24, 2002 12:01 AM -0200 Henrique de Moraes
Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's the clean
--On Tuesday, December 24, 2002 12:01 AM -0200 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Here's the cleaned up patch, against 2.1 CVS. It could be enhanced not to
touch the +fooobar part of the recipient, I suppose.
I guess I'm mostly of the opinion that this is an MTA job, as mos
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 14:43:17 -0500
From: "John A. Tamplin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I have a user mailbox that is genering thousands of these same "DBERROR:
skiplist recovery: should be ADD or DELETE" messages. This machine
hasn't been rebooted, and Cyrus hasn't even been rest
--On Saturday, December 21, 2002 3:01 PM -0500 "John A. Tamplin"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Quoting Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Is there a reason for not using a shared-memory interface for Cyrus to
allow
all imapds serving a mailbox to share flag state? Maybe a long-livi
--On Friday, December 13, 2002 12:52 AM -0500 Jay Levitt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I believe I've fixed this bug in CVS (did it a few days ago, actually)
and it'll be in the next release.
If I understand correctly, this fixes the flat-file seen implementation,
but not the underlying problem, w
--On Saturday, December 14, 2002 5:50 PM +0530 Jatin Nansi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
Will ctl_cyrusdb -r take 10 hours ? I dread the day when the system will
need downtime again.
This is on a decent 2 x P3 1 GHz with 100 GB scsi raid and 1 GB RAM,
about 2000 users, 50 MB per user.
I reall
--On Wednesday, December 18, 2002 12:39 PM +1100 Rob Mueller
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm just wondering if anyone know what this might be about. Seems to be a
BDB issue and it only happens a few times a day, but I don't know if it's
harmless or not. Interestingly it occurs on our less loaded s
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 20:32:50 -0500
From: "John A. Tamplin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Correct, but if the power gets cut to the drive during the block
write, all bets are off for the content of that block. True, most
of the time you won't get weird failures but then most of the time
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 20:00:52 -0500
From: "John A. Tamplin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[...]
Disks don't write one byte at a time, so a system crash during a
write can result in indeterminate state for the entire block (and
it gets worse when you go through the filesystem rather than raw
From: "Rob Mueller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 10:48:20 +1100
>It's scarier when you see this on the mailboxes DB.
>
> You've had this problem on your mailboxes db? Yuck.
Yes, after system crashes. I think it was a SCSI card/driver problem.
Hmm. Well, this i
From: "Rob Mueller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 13:01:48 +1100
Looks like you've got corrupted skiplist files. Delete the seen state
databases with the problem and it will automatically rebuild them.
That's what we do.
It's scarier when you see this on the mailboxes
From: Mike Cathey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 11 Dec 2002 13:05:08 -0500
[...]
I ran into a 'problem' during testing that may be related to the one
you've encountered. I started out using the bdb backend. During
testing, I moved (as in /bin/mv) a physical mailbox (in
/var/spool/i
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 17:02:28 -0700 (MST)
From: RJ45 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I got my mailboxes.db mangled because of a file system problem.
I cannot even delete or modify quota of some accounts anymore, it tells me
mailbox format is invalid.
How can I rebuild the whole mailboxes.
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 10:46:45 -0200
From: Alessandro Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[...]
Dec 9 09:12:35 intra03 imapd[30212]: DBERROR: skiplist recovery: 0958
should be ADD or DELETE
Dec 9 09:12:35 intra03 imapd[30212]: DBERROR: opening
/var/lib/imap/user/n/natacha.se
From: "JP Howard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 15:18:40 +0800
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002 17:06:51 +1100, "Rob Mueller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> Every now and then, we see the following error in our logs:
>
> Dec 6 22:29:20 www postfix/lmtp[15516]: 7319A58B2: to=,
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 19:07:55 +0900 (JST)
From: Mark Keasling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[...]
I'm in the process of trying to figure out how this stuff works...
Is it possible to separate the charset to utf-8 conversion from the text to
search data transformation?
It would be technicall
--On Tuesday, December 10, 2002 11:52 AM +0900 Mark Keasling
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Larry,
[ ... decode in fill_cache() ... ]
This hasn't been tested this yet since I stuck it in yesterday before
going home and have just returned to the office. It should decode
subjects into utf8. But
--On Monday, December 09, 2002 6:01 PM -0800 Tim Showalter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
different comparators would require different tables, I think. The table
Cyrus usually uses isn't suitable for i;ascii-casemap since space isn't
significant, but transcoding to UTF-8 and doing a dumb comparison
You bring up good questions.
First, our Sieve implementation currently doesn't deal with RFC 2047
encoded headers---or rather, it just compares the undecoded headers
against the UTF-8 string. This is obviously a bug which sadly isn't in
bugzilla.
Ken and I talked (a long time
--On Monday, December 09, 2002 4:39 PM + Stephen Grier
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
There is a more complete solution to the SIGCHILD problems in master,
that fixes all the race conditions that cause the process count to be
lost. I call it the "pid morgue" :-
--On Friday, December 06, 2002 1:09 PM +1100 Rob Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
This is probably more a berkeley DB question, but I'm wondering if anyone
else has seen this. Every now and then we see this in our imap log.
Dec 5 20:39:47 server2 lmtpd[24962]: DBERROR db3: Unable to allocate
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2002 21:50:40 +0100 (CET)
From: Wolfgang Hottgenroth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
on one of our production complexes with roughly 200,000 mailboxes
running on cyrus-imap-1, once we used 'reconstruct -m' after an
operator failure.
Within the manpage of reconstruct in cyru
--On Monday, December 02, 2002 10:11 PM +0100 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[...]
it takes around one hour per day of failure of checkpointing to restart.
-Is there a way to speedup that process?
Recovery speed is relative to how often checkpoints are done. Since your
checkpoints aren't finishing,
between sessions.
I believe I've fixed this bug in CVS (did it a few days ago, actually)
and it'll be in the next release.
My apologies for my disbelief,
Larry
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 10:08:52 -0500
From: Lawrence Greenfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--On Friday, November 15, 20
--On Thursday, November 21, 2002 2:03 PM -0200 Alessandro Oliveira
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Maybe the best solution would be a filter to change the message body
encoding using quoted-printable instead of putting X everywhere, and
change headers to also use the appropriate encoding. What do you
--On Thursday, November 21, 2002 1:26 PM -0200 Alessandro Oliveira
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there any possibility to put this as an autoconf option?
maybe something like: "./configure --enable-strict-headers |
--disable-strict-headers" would do the trick, or even better, a runtime
configura
--On Thursday, November 21, 2002 3:37 PM -0500 DAVID G MCMURTRIE
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, Rob Siemborski wrote:
"Upgrade your version of cyrus"
Many many many locking and performance improvements have been made since
then, and spending the time to diagnose the problems w
--On Thursday, November 21, 2002 4:29 PM +0100 Ralf Haferkamp
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
we encountered problems with some multipart MIME mails. It seems, that
cyrus-imapd fails to correctly seperate the different parts of mail under
certain circumstances. This e.g. the case if one MIME part
--On Tuesday, November 19, 2002 5:09 PM + Ian McDonald
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Over the weekend, it struck me that a patch to make 'seen' global could be
as simple as commenting out the calls to the code that treats '\Seen' as a
special-case global variable, and adding 'Seen' to the list o
It would be nice to add a backup section to the documentation.
Live backup is supported with Cyrus, though running "dump" on a live
filesystem is only to be done with care. We use vxfs on Solaris and
snapshots and have been happy with it.
The databases are backed up by Cyrus 2.1 every checkpoin
--On Monday, November 18, 2002 8:57 PM -0200 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Linux-specific that they have would negative consequences if applied
to a source tree used for a Solaris or *BSD build?? With Linux being
No negative consequences that I know of. But increased
--On Saturday, November 16, 2002 2:10 PM +0900 Hajimu UMEMOTO
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 13 Nov 2002 15:57:57 -0500 (EST)
Rob Siemborski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
rjs3> I'm pleased to announce the release of Cyrus IMAPd 2.1.10. This is
mostly rjs3> a bug-fix and cleanup release,
--On Friday, November 15, 2002 7:47 PM + Ian McDonald
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How difficult would it be to hack Cyrus to either make Seen global, or
make Seen globally visible?
Well, it's not clear in IMAP how to show the status of other user's seen
flags.
While it wouldn't be impossib
From: "Ian McDonald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 19:09:14 -
Is there any way for an admin user to read, or write, another users Seen
flags?
No.
Do any other flags behave like this?
No. \Delete probably should be a per-user flag but it isn't.
Larry
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 15:44:45 +1100
From: Andrew McNamara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[...]
BTW, have you looked at Andrew Tridgell's Trivial Database? It uses mmaped
files and spin-locks to achieve good write performance, although I don't
think resilience in the face of crashes was a high
From: "Ian McDonald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 18:07:59 -
When I move (copy and delete) messages between shared folders, the
(\Answered) and (\Flagged) flags are preserved, but the (\Seen) flag seems
to be removed.
The user doing the moving is some housekeep
--On Friday, November 15, 2002 8:49 PM +1100 Andrew McNamara
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I suspect there is a bug in the flat-file seen implementation. Each
process opens the seen file and holds this file descriptor open. Then one
process wants to update the file. It does this by writing a new fil
--On Friday, November 15, 2002 2:40 PM +1100 Andrew McNamara
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In general none of Cyrus will necessarily work over NFS. If you're only
accessing the NFS store from a single client, things have a much better
chance of working---
By single client, do you mean a single NFS
--On Friday, November 15, 2002 12:52 PM +1100 Andrew McNamara
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What's the general feeling on the skiplist implementation used in
conjunction with Sun and NetApp's NFS (we're locked in to using this
combination for various reasons)? Would you be more or less likely to
tru
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 11:16:41 -0800 (PST)
From: Jonathan Marsden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[...]
The name of the option is potentially confusing, in that the desired
mailbox is not 100% *automatically* created. Rather, it is only
created when the new user logs in and issues a CREATE INB
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 10:56:07 -0500
From: Scott Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[...]
Sooo... any reason why the docs aren't sgml and then built for text,
html, ps, etc? Think of this as less of a request and more of 'would
CMU be interested' type question. :)
No objections, but it's
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 09:38:27 +0100
From: Luca Olivetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Andrew McNamara wrote:
> I realise this is an old known problem, but I've spent some time searching
> list archives, and other sources looking for an answer. Any help anyone
> can provide will be grate
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 11:04:32 -0500 (EST)
From: Peter Krotkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[...]
22335: imapd -s
ff09b3bc read (0, 1c4bc8, 6f5)
0008e8c8 sock_read (0, 1c4bc8, 6f5, 8e8a0, 18edf8, 1) + 28
0008d670 BIO_read (1bd090, 1c4bc8, 6f5, 1c32a8, 1bccf0, 0) + d0
0007dec8 s
I've been talking to Simon somewhat about his API. He doesn't think it
would be hard to implement a compatibility layer; I suspect he's a
little optimistic but I'm hopeful we'll all come to the same API
eventually.
Larry
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 22:48:47 -0500 (EST)
From: Rob Siemborski <[EMAI
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 14:07:11 -0500 (EST)
From: Peter Krotkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Do the lmtpd acquire or are they _attempting_ to acquire the lock on
> the cyrus.seen file?
>
> Are you using the seen_local backend instead of seen_db? This hasn't
> been tested by us in a lo
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2002 14:31:41 -0800
From: Paul Ramsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[...]
Yes, I am running 1.6.24. To head off any "just upgrade" comments, I
would like to note that all the rename() and cyrus.seen code in the
2.1.x tree seems to be identical to the code in the 1.6.24 tree
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 09:04:56 -0500 (EST)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We are experiencing locking problems with cyrus 2.1.9 on a Solaris 8
system using fcntl and skiplist (except flat for subscriptions).
We've seen the following issues:
* Lmtpd's acquire a lock on a cyrus.seen fi
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 14:02:52 -0200
From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Wed, 06 Nov 2002, John Wade wrote:
> I assume you are using flat seen files. If so, I ran into this
> problem on 2.0.16 and came up with a workaround which others
> ported to 2.1.3. Th
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 12:55:03 -0500
From: twk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
We are running both 1.5.x and 2.1.x versions of Cyrus. I have a
$#%$^#$%^ user that has his email client set to check every folder
ever few seconds. I can't remove him from the password file, as we
use Kerberos f
From: "Rob Mueller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 15:30:09 +1000
[...]
So this lets you turn off the use of fsync() calls altogher, but is clearly
regarded as "unsafe". I was wondering however, how "unsafe" it would be to
remove the calls from the commit() code, which I'
From: "Rob Mueller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 15:30:09 +1000
[...]
So this lets you turn off the use of fsync() calls altogher, but is clearly
regarded as "unsafe". I was wondering however, how "unsafe" it would be to
remove the calls from the commit() code, which I'
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 11:04:08 +0100
From: Simon Loader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Andy Saxena wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It is not mbox, neither is it maildir. What is the official name of the
> file format used by Cyrus to store email?
Id call it Cyrus mailbox format ... (CMF)
But
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 17:44:01 -0300 (ADT)
From: Aidan Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[...]
This says
>--with-duplicate-db=DB use DB (db3, skiplist) as a backend
> for the duplicate delivery db (Default: db3_nosync
)
db3_nosync, since the w
From: Su Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 17:20:11 -0400
First of all I can get 9-10 messages per second now by move the mail store
to a striped hard disk(3 disk strip to one).
I think there are more than one sendmail deliver processes try to deliver to
lmtpd. Bec
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 11:23:11 -0400
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
OK, I did that and now sendmail is happily delivering via LMTP!
Thanks. Added a slide about setting up to use LMTP.
My m4 -
FEATURE(`preserve_local_plus_detail')
...
MAILER(cyrusv2)dnl
...
define(`c
What version of Sendmail are you using? You want Sendmail 8.12.4 or
later. You should consider running Sendmail in deliverymode=queue with
frequent queue runs if you want the best possible performance. (Take a
look sendmail/TUNING in the Sendmail distribution.)
You should also configure Sendmail
Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 21:30:16 -0300
From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Thu, 23 May 2002, Lawrence Greenfield wrote:
> It was an idea to collect information on subprocesses that we never
> really followed through on. I've actually been
Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 14:55:46 -0300
From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
What is the deal with tugowar, and the snmp statistics for the various
daemons in imap/ ?
It was an idea to collect information on subprocesses that we never
really followed through on. I'
Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 19:32:44 -0700
From: David Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Cyrus-Info <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cyrus does recycle processes. Unix forking is amazingly slow compared
> to not forking and on servers that receive many connections a second
> this performance twea
From: "Tim Pushor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 18:41:46 -0600
I wonder how many IMAP processes are short lived enough to make a
difference? I know at least on my servers they are fairly long running.
If you have 6500 simulataneous connections and 7 new connections per
Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 14:08:15 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[...]
Does cyrus perhaps "recycle" imapd processes rather than killing them and
starting new ones? If so, what is the logic behind this? (Unix forking is
remarkably fast, and starting fresh each time
1 - 100 of 414 matches
Mail list logo
