Cyrus/NFS/SMB

2000-11-20 Thread Tristan Ball
Note: this is not something I have tried, or even wish to, as my largest cyrus email server handles 250 users at the moment, easily handled by a Sun E450. :-) I've seen the messages poo-pooing using NFS for cyrus, and the reasons make sense, my question is would another shared filesystem, like sa

Re: Cyrus/NFS/SMB

2000-11-29 Thread Marco Colombo
On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Tristan Ball wrote: > Note: this is not something I have tried, or even wish to, as my largest > cyrus email server handles 250 users at the moment, easily handled by a > Sun E450. :-) > > I've seen the messages poo-pooing using NFS for cyrus, and the reasons > make sense, m

Re: Cyrus/NFS/SMB

2000-12-01 Thread Tristan Ball
> My understanding is that Cyrus IMAPD itself is designed as a central > mailboxes (a special kind of files, in a way) server. Yes. > So it makes little sense to put the mailboxes themselves on a different The only place I think it might make sense is on cheap large scale servers. In particular

Re: Cyrus/NFS/SMB

2000-12-10 Thread Lawrence Greenfield
--On Monday, November 20, 2000 11:34:15 AM +1100 Tristan Ball <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Note: this is not something I have tried, or even wish to, as my largest > cyrus email server handles 250 users at the moment, easily handled by a > Sun E450. :-) > > I've seen the messages poo-pooing us